Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
THE REVIEW

Social prescribing in very deprived areas

Peter Cawston
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (586): 350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X572517
Peter Cawston
This is the fifth of 12 articles from the GPs at the Deep End
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

‘I didn't become a GP to spend my life prescribing pills’

Social and medical problems are often not differentiated by patients who look to GP practices for help. Many patients present with concerns that arise from their social situation, and the management of long-term medical conditions is often affected by personal circumstances. Doctors need to be able to respond to this wider picture. Indeed, the extent to which doctors are able and willing to take into account their patients' daily lives and concerns is seen as a key element of good quality medical care by patients who live in socially deprived areas.1

Many GPs develop some knowledge about resources outside of the health service that can assist patients; for example, with financial problems, domestic violence, or housing issues. Some GP practices also work with outside groups to promote or plan local resources. This practice of signposting patients to non-health service resources has been labelled ‘social prescribing’.

Ten GPs, working among some of the most deprived patient populations in Scotland, took part in a small study to examine the extent to which social prescribing forms part of their clinical work.

Two major themes emerge from this reflection. The first is their awareness of the disabling impact of government policies. The second is their aspiration to emphasise the strengths of patients themselves to tackle their own problems.

The GPs who took part are aware of the problems that many of their patients face: low pay, alienating work conditions, low expectations, poor educational achievement, ready access to drugs of addiction including alcohol and tobacco, worklessness, poor nutrition, and poor physical and mental health. Many of these factors are inter-generational and affect children from the earliest age.2

They point out that rationing on medical grounds of resources, including benefits and housing, emphasises disability. Personal anxieties and social problems are repackaged as medical problems, such as mood disorder or chronic pain. For many patients this appears to be the only channel available by which to struggle for self- betterment.

GPs are concerned that doctors' reports provided in response to requests to prove medical need set them up as gatekeepers for social resources. Signposting patients in crisis to welfare advocates may add to this dependency if they need to emphasise that their client is a sick person in order to achieve a basic standard of living. This can create conflict between seeking to improve the patient's long-term self-efficacy, and responding to the immediate welfare needs and expectations of the patient.

Despite these concerns, the GPs recognise social prescribing as a valuable part of their practice. They believe that community resources are important in supporting the health of their patients. They also acknowledge the role of advocacy in helping patients to make better use of health services. Moreover, they express concern about the impact on their patients' welfare of budget cuts to voluntary groups.

The GPs emphasise the constraints on space, time, and personnel and the need for clear boundaries as to what primary care has to offer. Many social and personal problems cannot be dealt with effectively by the GP and require community resources. Practice-attached health visitors provide an important link between the practice and the community in relation to child welfare.

The GPs do not see the role of the practice team as simply that of providing information about a list of services, but rather as using their experience and empathic relationships to support patients to make use of the most appropriate resources at the right time. Community resources are most valued by the GPs when they are seen to help people develop the positive ability to improve or ‘take ownership’ of their own health. These might include writing or creative arts groups, carers' support, volunteering, and educational opportunities as well as more traditional resources, such as addiction services or exercise schemes.

In summary, the GPs who took part in the Social Prescribing Project think it is important to help patients take control of their own health and wellbeing. They see this as a core primary care role, centred on their personal relationships with individual patients. They value other organisations that can further this goal, and regularly point patients in their direction.

The GPs believe that the following key recommendations would support more effective social prescribing in primary care:

  • a well-maintained, locally relevant, and user friendly internet directory of community resources for use by practitioners;

  • more medical and nursing time in consultations to respond to very challenging needs by clear explanation and guidance;

  • clear guidance for patients and organisations approaching GP practices for reports or advocacy support;

  • extension of the primary care team to include a practice-attached social worker, employability advisor, and mental health worker;

  • increased funding to voluntary and local agencies in deprived communities and protection from budgetary cuts; and

  • benefits reform that reflects the realities of life in the poorest communities, and which guarantees a basic standard of living to all rather than seeking to distinguish between the deserving and the undeserving poor on medical grounds.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, May 2011

References

  1. ↵
    1. Mercer SW,
    2. Cawston PG,
    3. Bikker AP
    (2007) Quality in general practice consultations: a qualitative study of the views of patients living in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland. BMC Fam Pract 8:22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Deep End Report 2. Coping with needs, demands and resources. The second meeting of ‘General Practitioners at the Deep End’, 22 January 2010. http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_146571_en.pdf (accessed 8 Apr 2011).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 61 (586)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 61, Issue 586
May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Social prescribing in very deprived areas
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Social prescribing in very deprived areas
Peter Cawston
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (586): 350. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X572517

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Social prescribing in very deprived areas
Peter Cawston
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (586): 350. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X572517
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • ‘I didn't become a GP to spend my life prescribing pills’
    • References
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

THE REVIEW

  • Tick. Tick. Tick ....
  • Made to measure?
  • HIV testing: the danger of keeping secrets
Show more THE REVIEW

Essay

  • Tick. Tick. Tick ....
  • Made to measure?
  • HIV testing: the danger of keeping secrets
Show more Essay

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242