Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions

Editor’s Briefing

Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (587): 372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X572599
Roger Jones
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The first months of 2011 have been among the most momentous in recent memory. Around the globe geopolitical maps are being re-drawn. Mother nature has flexed her muscles across the continents. Healthcare reform is at the forefront of national politics in many countries. Aspects of this international turmoil and a very real sense of interdependence emerge in this month’s issue of the BJGP.

Looking East, a moving and inspirational account of the aftermath of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami (Hutt and Kassai), and the response of primary medical care is published alongside an editorial from Hong Kong that provides an overview of the role of acupuncture in various health systems (Wong and Chung). The editorial is based around two papers from Paterson and colleagues, from the south-west of England, who report the positive results of a randomised controlled trial of acupuncture in patients with unexplained physical symptoms, and accompany this with a qualitative description of the views of patients taking part in the trial. A series of five-element acupuncture treatments has significant and sustained benefit in patients who frequently attend with medically unexplained symptoms. The patients who were interviewed not only provided insights about what they perceived as valuable in these sessions, but also felt able to undertake more self-care for their problems. In a provocative article reviewing fatalities associated with complementary and alternative therapies, Ernst makes a plea for more systematic monitoring of the possible adverse effects of non-traditional therapies.

The population prevalence of anxiety, defined by standard criteria, is remarkably high around the world, and three papers look at different aspects of this ubiquitous problem. In a valuable analysis from Malaysia, Sherina and co-workers explore the factors associated with anxiety in women attending a primary care clinic and identify intimate partner tensions and violence as key associations. Counter-intuitively perhaps, the paper from Nijmegen, Netherlands, finds that unexplained physical symptoms, while associated with anxiety, are not predictive of it (van Boven et al). Tait and Berrisford’s editorial extends this discussion and provides useful guidance on a primary care approach to generalised anxiety disorder.

Last month we discussed the importance of access to investigations for patients suspected of having cancer, and this theme is echoed in David Kernick’s analysis of the pros and cons of direct access to imaging for adults with headache. Recognising the thinness of the evidence base, Kernick recommends direct access to computed tomography, but says that the costs and high rates of incidental findings make direct access to MRI less compelling. A slightly different set of benefits are described for open-access transvaginal ultrasonography by de Vries and co-workers from Amsterdam, who found it valuable in prompting GPs to reconsider their provisional diagnoses, as well as providing evidence-based reassurance when findings were normal.

Peter Rose and colleagues’ review of the risks and benefits of low dose aspirin therapy — which may prevent cancer as well as ischaemic heart disease — is timely, and their advice about cautious prescribing in younger patients and careful explanation and review in older patients are important messages for practice, although the informed discussion with patients about vascular and cancer risk reduction against the increased chances of cranial or gastrointestinal haemorrhage is fairly challenging.

End-of-life research, where traditional ideas about what constitutes palliative care are often re-cast, is increasingly focused on anticipating and responding to the needs of patients as they approach the ‘terminal’ phase of an illness. Abarshi and colleagues examine the difficult question of how patients likely to die in the near future can best be recognised — important because they are more likely to be well served in their last weeks if this determination can be made accurately. And Patrick White’s group from London emphasise the distinctions, as well as the overlap, between anticipatory supportive and palliative care and, end-of-life care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, January 2011
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 61 (587)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 61, Issue 587
June 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Editor’s Briefing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Editor’s Briefing
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (587): 372. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X572599

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Editor’s Briefing
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (587): 372. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X572599
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242