Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Authors' response

Ewan Stewart, Paul Arkell and Ian Williams
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (588): 437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X583047
Ewan Stewart
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Arkell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian Williams
Roles: Chair of the British HIV Association
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Dr Smith raises an important issue concerning the implementation of HIV testing strategies.1 Recent guidance from NICE echoes that of the 2008 UK guidelines, and recommends that men and women known to be from a country of high HIV prevalence should routinely be offered and recommended an HIV test from healthcare professionals in primary and secondary care.2 NICE acknowledge, however, that there is a lack of evidence of the effectiveness of different interventions to increase uptake of testing.

Approaches include simply increasing the routine offer of a test at a time when individuals attend primary care services or, alternatively, directly contacting registered patients inviting them to attend for a test. Recent research has shown there is high level of acceptability by patients, including black Africans, of being routinely offered a test when attending various health services including primary care and that this approach is associated with high uptake of testing.3 Frequently, the barrier here lies with the reluctance of healthcare professionals to offer a test rather than reluctance by patients to accept a test when the offer is seen as part of routine care.

The acceptability of contacting patients directly has not been established and there is an absence of published research evaluating this approach. The concern is that such an intervention would lead to increased stigmatisation among the targeted group with low uptake levels of testing. In a survey of black Africans newly diagnosed with HIV, a high proportion (76%) reported seeing their GP within the 12 months prior to diagnosis, and of those attending the issue of HIV testing was raised in only 17%.4 This suggests that increasing the routine offer and uptake of testing at the point of access to health services may result in a significant number being diagnosed earlier and that this may be a more effective case finding approach than other screening interventions.

Reducing the barriers to and increasing the uptake of testing in primary care is an important first step and we would encourage Dr Smith and his colleagues to undertake this as outlined in the NICE guidance. We would also welcome and encourage the evaluation of other approaches to increasing the uptake of HIV testing in primary care, including systematically contacting those from the target populations, to assess their acceptability and effectiveness.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, January 2011

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Smith C
    (2011) HIV: low prevalence is no excuse for not testing. Br J Gen Pract 61(558):436–437.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. NICE
    (2011) PH33 Increasing the uptake of HIV testing among black Africans in England: guidance (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London) http://guidance.nice.org.uk/PH33/Guidance/pdf/English (accessed 6 Jun 2011).
  3. ↵
    1. HPA
    (2010) Time to test for HIV: expanded healthcare and community HIV testing in England (Health Protection Agency, London) http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb_C/1287145269283 (accessed 6 Jun 2011).
  4. ↵
    1. Burns FM,
    2. Johnson AM,
    3. Nazroo J,
    4. et al.
    (2008) Missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis within primary and secondary healthcare settings in the UK. AIDS 22(1):115–122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 61 (588)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 61, Issue 588
July 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Authors' response
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Authors' response
Ewan Stewart, Paul Arkell, Ian Williams
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (588): 437. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X583047

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Authors' response
Ewan Stewart, Paul Arkell, Ian Williams
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (588): 437. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X583047
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Two-tiered medicine: the increasing disparity in medical care in the UK
  • MRCGP Recorded Consultation Assessment — the hidden fourth construct
  • Prostate-specific antigen testing and opportunistic prostate cancer screening — CAP intervention
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242