Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Blog
    • eLetters
    • Feedback
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Blog
    • eLetters
    • Feedback
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
Letters

‘Heartsink’ patients in general practice

Tom O'Dowd
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (588): 437-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X583056
Tom O'Dowd
Trinity College, Dublin 24. E-mail: todowd@tcd.ie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: todowd@tcd.ie
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Dr Andrew Moscrop has carried out an interesting analysis of the impact of my paper on heartsink patients in general practice published 23 years ago.1 I was a young GP when I started the lunchtime management meetings on heartsink patients in the practice, without any intent of it ever being published as a paper and having the impact that it has had. I have been aware of its unselfconscious use, particularly among practising clinicians, as they often use the term in discussion or in presentations to colleagues. I have also been aware that it has been controversial among my academic colleagues who, like me, find it somewhat politically incorrect and difficult to research.

I have seen articles on ‘heartlift patients’ designed to counteract the perceived negativity of the heartsink phenomenon. I have never felt the need to defend or explain, as it is what it is, and I have kept my distance from it. Since the recent BJGP paper, colleagues in Ireland and the UK have expressed surprise to me that the term had a descriptive origin as it has been part of the unreferenced clinical vernacular for so long.

When we originally discussed heartsink patients in the practice in 1982, it was noticeable that the discussions were quite positive and converted a sometimes very negative situation into a more purposeful if authoritarian one. The study contains several weaknesses, of course, and, despite the prompt acceptance of the paper by the BMJ, I developed anxieties about it and considered withdrawing the paper. My most pressing anxiety at the time was that it was self-disclosing. The manuscript accepted by the BMJ had a number of case descriptions that they agreed to remove from the published paper. Rather amazingly, no one thought of seeking ethical approval at the time.

Some think it may be more useful to talk of heartsink relationships rather than heartsink patients. This sanitises the term and moves the focus on to a relationship that means the heartsink feelings are shared between the patient and the doctor. We don't know if this is the case.

As a senior GP now, I recognise the self-sacrificial nature of practice wherein a GP continues to look after a heartsink patient, year in and year out, despite the feelings engendered. I haven't used the term for many years but I still experience the phenomenon after 32 years in practice, albeit much less frequently. Having a vocational training scheme in this academic department, I notice that each year one of our GP-registrars presents a case of a heartsink patient at our grand rounds. I view it as a socialisation process — as a step made by young doctors entering the world of general practice.

The heartsink paper reflected the rough and tumble of clinical life in a way that has resonated with doctors and others for years now. Such reflections on practice still occur but often as humorous opinion pieces by medical writers based on random experiences. There is a continuing need for clinicians to reflect on their clinical experience in a systematic way that provides useful insights that lead to better doctor–patient understanding.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, January 2011

REFERENCE

  1. ↵
    1. Moscrop A
    (2011) ‘Heartsink’ patients in general practice: a defining paper, its impact, and psychodynamic potential. Br J Gen Pract 61(586):346–348.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 61 (588)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 61, Issue 588
July 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
‘Heartsink’ patients in general practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
Citation Tools
‘Heartsink’ patients in general practice
Tom O'Dowd
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (588): 437-438. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X583056

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
‘Heartsink’ patients in general practice
Tom O'Dowd
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (588): 437-438. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X583056
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCE
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Epinephrine auto-injectors for acute asthma as well as anaphylaxis
  • Should we continue pairing the term ‘anecdotal’ with evidence?
  • Effect of weather on GP home visits
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

 

Register by 10 December and save 15% at the BJGP Research Conference, 12 March 2020

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Blog
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2019 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242