Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Advertisement
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Review

Book reviews

Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (590): 571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X593947
Roger Jones
London, UK. E-mail:
Roles: BJGP Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rjones@rcgp.org.uk
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
ACADEMIC GENERAL PRACTICE IN THE UK MEDICAL SCHOOLS 1948–2000; A SHORT HISTORY JOHN HOWIE AND MICHAEL WHITFIELD Edinburgh University Press, 2011 PB, 160, £19.99, 978-0784643561

The first university chair of General Practice in the UK was established in Edinburgh 15 years after the beginning of the NHS, in 1963. Academic general practice and primary care is now a strong and self-confident discipline, making major contributions to undergraduate education and to research in the UK medical schools and, of course, primary care is now at the heart of the NHS reforms, with self-evident implications for academic support

This readable compilation of accounts of how the discipline developed in each medical school, written by those most involved, at least in more recent events, may not have the brio of a David Lodge or even a CP Snow story but it is nonetheless an interesting one. Remarkable, really, to think of how those who had fallen off Lord Moran's ladder have emerged as research leaders, educational innovators, and Deans of medical schools. Many of the early units sprang from established departments of academic public health (and were often seen as almost identical to them by universities because they were ‘out there’, although nothing could be furtherfrom the truth). The general practice departments mirrored the mutidisciplinarity of general practice itself, so that collaboration between clinicians, allied health professionals, and social and behavioural scientists rapidly became commonplace. The GP departments were often the medical school leaders on the softer parts of the curriculum, such as medical ethics and communication skills.

The newer medical schools have recognised the value of a community focus, of teaching in general practices and the potential of primary care research, and set up primary care departments from scratch. Ironically, under pressures from institutional re-configurations and fashions in research structures and funding, some of the older departments are now becoming absorbed into relatively amorphous groups with halfhearted titles such as healthcare research and population sciences. The replacement of the generalist perspective by a focus on a single illness or organ may not be a particularly smart strategic move, particularly at this time of confusion, and therefore opportunity, in the NHS and in medical education and training.

The individual stories are tales of opportunities grasped and missed, heroes and villains, Davids and Goliaths. They are case histories which may not be general sable. The bigger story, and the messages for those interested in building up academic primary care, is touched on in the final appendix to the body of the text. The first essential building block was to convince the system of the ability of general practice to deliver high quality undergraduate education outside the walls of the medical schools, and then to prise the funding — SIFT in England, ACT in Scotland — out of the hospitals and into general practice to pay teachers properly and provide an adequate infrastructure. The next was to demonstrate the need for research in general practice by general practice, and to convince funders of its quality: the Medical Research Council Topic Review was crucial in this respect, and the Mant Report of NHS R&D was a further essential plank in the foundations, laying out the rationale for adequate funding for primary care research and the beginning of a career structure for primary care researchers. Getting senior academic GPs on to the same terms and conditions as academics in specialist medicine was another key to recruitment and retention.

Only 1:225 GPs has an academic post compared with 1:16 consultants — but this doesn't tell the whole story, because over half of all general practices in the UK are involved in undergraduate teaching and/or postgraduate training. Research activity, especially recruitment to trials, has been hugely enhanced by the creation of well-funded primary care and comprehensive research networks as part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Strategy, and the formation of the NIHR National School of Primary Care Research is the most recent endorsement of the value to the health service attached to primary care research. We have a good deal to thank our courageous and imaginative predecessors for, and this book is a fitting tribute to them.

The publication of this book is timely. As the focus of clinical work shifts further towards the community, the need for a highly skilled primary care workforce is greater than ever, and the medical schools have a key role in providing exposure and education in general practice for their undergraduates. As the complexities of illness and healthcare management increase, research that builds the evidence base for diagnosis, treatment and service delivery is crucial, and the university departments are once again in a pivotal role, for which they are uniquely well equipped.

Footnotes

  • For information about discounted copies please contact Jan Bunyan at Jan.Bunyan{at}ed.ac.uk

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2011
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 61 (590)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 61, Issue 590
September 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Book reviews
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Book reviews
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (590): 571. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X593947

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Book reviews
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (590): 571. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X593947
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Tick. Tick. Tick ....
  • Made to measure?
  • No evidence for topical preparations in preventing stretch marks in pregnancy
Show more The Review

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242