Debate & Analysis
Why the ‘reason for encounter’ should be incorporated in the analysis of outcome of care
Tim C olde Hartman, Hiske van Ravesteijn, Peter Lucassen, Kees van Boven, Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten and Chris van Weel
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (593): e839-e841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X613269
Tim C olde Hartman
Roles: GP
Hiske van Ravesteijn
Roles: Registrar in Psychiatry, PhD Student
Peter Lucassen
Roles: GP
Kees van Boven
Roles: GP
Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten
Roles: Assistant Professor, GP
Chris van Weel
Roles: Professor of General Practice
In this issue
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 61, Issue 593
December 2011
Why the ‘reason for encounter’ should be incorporated in the analysis of outcome of care
Tim C olde Hartman, Hiske van Ravesteijn, Peter Lucassen, Kees van Boven, Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten, Chris van Weel
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (593): e839-e841. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X613269
Jump to section
More in this TOC Section
Related Articles
Cited By...
Intended for Healthcare Professionals