Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Review

Series introduction

Floris van de Laar, Tom Fahey, Tim Kenealy and Bruce Arroll
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (606): 40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X660878
Floris van de Laar
Roles: GP, Researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Fahey
Roles: GP, Researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tim Kenealy
Roles: GP, Researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce Arroll
Roles: GP, Researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

About oysters and the Cochrane Primary Care Field

Starting this issue, the British Journal of General Practice will publish PEARLS from the Cochrane Library. 1 Pearls are known to be valuable and hard little objects that are produced within the soft flesh of oysters. Cochrane PEARLS are no different. Although we do not want to compare Cochrane reviews with jelly-like, salty content imprisoned in an unbreakable crust, it is no secret that some people find them difficult to read, or even boring.2 Therefore the Cochrane Primary Care Field, in close collaboration with the New Zealand Guidelines Group developed concise and succinct summaries of Cochrane reviews. We called them Practical Evidence About Real Life Situations (PEARLS) to emphasise our mission in bringing evidence from high quality systematic reviews as close as possible to the doctor, nurse, and the patient. An average PEARLS has the key message in the title, presents the question and main results first, and provides the main caveats and some background information. Nothing less, nothing more. Interested readers who are hungry for more will find full abstracts or even the full content online.

Of course the mission of the Cochrane Primary Care Field does not end with disseminating PEARLS. On the contrary. To make Cochrane reviews more relevant to primary care we need the enthusiasm and input of people who understand ‘the messy context in which people get ill, seek health care and receive treatment’.2 Through our Field, your voice can be heard in the processes of priority setting, methodology development, protocol and review development, peer reviewing, or policy making. Anyone who wants to express their interest in making Cochrane more relevant to primary care is welcome to visit www.cochranegetinvolved.org. More information regarding the Cochrane Primary Care Field, including all previously published PEARLS, can be found at www.cochraneprimarycare.org.

We hope that our PEARLS, whether you like oysters or not, are a help in improving your work and making evidence-based medicine more fun.

Notes

Competing interests

All authors are active members of the Cochrane Primary Health Care Field and Cochrane Collaborative Review Groups.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2013

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. McAvoy BR
    (2013) PEARLS: evening dosing of antihypertensive drugs more effective in lowering blood pressure. Br J Gen Pract 63(606):41.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Greenhalgh T
    (2012) Outside the Box: Why are Cochrane reviews so boring? Br J Gen Pract 62(600):371.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 63 (606)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 63, Issue 606
January 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Series introduction
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Series introduction
Floris van de Laar, Tom Fahey, Tim Kenealy, Bruce Arroll
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (606): 40. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X660878

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Series introduction
Floris van de Laar, Tom Fahey, Tim Kenealy, Bruce Arroll
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (606): 40. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X660878
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • About oysters and the Cochrane Primary Care Field
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Tick. Tick. Tick ....
  • Made to measure?
  • Shared humanity: a Jane Austen bicentenary
Show more The Review

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242