Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

The case for neutrality on assisted dying — a personal view

Christopher Wayte
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (607): 68-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X662902
Christopher Wayte
GP, Bath. E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: chrissallywayte@btinternet.com
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Clare Gerada has done a lot of good things since becoming Chair of Council at the RCGP: her regular e-mail updates are very good. Unfortunately her ill-judged article on assisted dying and changing the College position on the issue is unhelpful and deeply flawed.1

She makes the common mistake of giving weight to the Falconer commission. It is well recognised that the Falconer commission was a propaganda vehicle for Dignity in Dying, the pro-euthansia pressure group. The commission was chaired by Lord Falconer, a member of Dignity in Dying and a prominent advocate of euthanasia and assisted suicide, the commission was by Dignity in Dying, it was funded by Terry Pratchett, a celebrity member of Dignity in Dying, and 12 out of 13 of the commission members were known supporters of assisted suicide and euthanasia. So the Falconer commission was in no way an unbiased and neutral observer on the issue, but a strongly pro-euthanasia and pro-assisted suicide report. Clare Gerada is either being naïve or economical with the truth if she believes that the Falconer commission provides an unbiased and fair opinion.

Although advocating neutrality on the issue sounds very reasonable, it does in fact shift the College position towards legalising assisted suicide and euthanasia, so it is not a ‘neutral’ position to advocate this change. Repeated polls have shown the majority of doctors to be opposed to assisted suicide and euthanasia, and despite repeated efforts by the pro-euthanasia lobby at BMA conferences, the BMA retains its opposition to assisted suicide and euthanasia.

The answer to suffering in terminal illness situations is not to kill the sufferer, or to aid them in killing themselves, but is in practising good palliative care. We are very fortunate in the UK in having a very good palliative care system, and improving overall standards of palliative care is the right way forward. It is interesting that the Netherlands has historically had very poor palliative care service, and their answer to much terminal suffering has been to kill patients rather than provide palliative care.

Finally it is questionable whether Clare Gerada has the right to use a BJGP article to express her personal view. As a doctor she is not allowed to let her personal views affect how she looks after patients, and it is questionable whether she should be allowed to use her position of authority to publicly express a personal view. I also trust that, in the interests of fairness, that the BJGP will be publishing in due course a viewpoint from an opponent of legalising assisted suicide, in order to give a balanced view.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2013

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Gerada C
    (2012) Viewpoint: The case for neutrality on assisted dying — a personal view. Br J Gen Pract 62(605):650.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 63 (607)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 63, Issue 607
February 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The case for neutrality on assisted dying — a personal view
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The case for neutrality on assisted dying — a personal view
Christopher Wayte
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (607): 68-69. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X662902

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The case for neutrality on assisted dying — a personal view
Christopher Wayte
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (607): 68-69. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X662902
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • An earlier diagnosis of heart failure
  • Group A strep: has point-of-care testing for primary care finally come of age?
  • Author response
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242