Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Tools

Hugh Dinwoodie
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (607): 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X662948
Hugh Dinwoodie
75 East Trinity Road, Edinburgh. E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hugh.dinwoodie1@btinternet.com
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

For the last decade or two general practice, indeed medicine in general, has been manufacturing ‘tools’ as if a 21st century industrial revolution was under way. Am I alone in my distaste and negative reactions, feeling that in most cases the word ‘tool’ is now used in a most ignorant and inappropriate way? Most patients know exactly what tools are, and use them to good effect in the real world. (I once used a tendon hammer, before I retired: a valued tool).

Surely there are many more infinitely preferable words in the English language from which to choose, if concepts such as a scheme, plan, protocol, syllabus, or resource is really what is meant, for something intangible but intended to be teachable (if not necessarily memorable).

While ruminating on why these etymological reflections have kept bothering me continually over the years, and as several dictionaries seemed to support me, I turned to the December BJGP to see if it was as ubiquitous as I thought. On the contents page, I read the very first entry: ‘page 621: European Antibiotic Awareness Day 2012: TARGET antibiotics through guidance, education, and … TOOLS’ (my capitals).1

The last word triggered something in me — this local etymological mishap had now achieved a European, if not global, dimension. I even read the article, and found this four-lettered t-word not only appeared at the end of Table 1 (‘tools to use with patients’), but it had even secreted itself in the acronym ‘TARGET’ as well as in ‘toolkit’ (fortunately the acronym was suitably and considerately elaborated for those who can't keep up with them).

I looked back at the contents pages: ‘page 661: Writing therapy: a new tool for general practice?’2 This saw me reaching instinctively for my pen, to share these thoughts with the Editor. (Very therapeutic!).

At this point I read on in the Journal, and was fascinated to find Neville Goodman's ‘Familiarity breeds: clichés in article titles’; and barely surprised to find the errant word quoted in his last sentence.3 This monosyllabic t-word, although just a word, not a phrase, surely also has all the characteristics of a cliché, by his definition. It not only appears in article titles, but in the very fabric of our current medical literature, and it is time we called a tool a spade, or at least classed it with coalfaces as reprehensible management-speak.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2013

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Moore M,
    2. McNulty C
    (2012) European Antibiotic Awareness Day 2012: TARGET antibiotics through guidance, education, and tools. Br J Gen Pract 62(605):621–622.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mugerwa S,
    2. Holden JD
    (2012) Writing therapy: a new tool for general practice? Br J Gen Pract 62(605):661–663.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Goodman N
    (2012) Familiarity breeds: clichés in article titles. Br J Gen Pract 62(605):656–657.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 63 (607)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 63, Issue 607
February 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tools
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Tools
Hugh Dinwoodie
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (607): 70. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X662948

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Tools
Hugh Dinwoodie
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (607): 70. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X662948
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • An earlier diagnosis of heart failure
  • Group A strep: has point-of-care testing for primary care finally come of age?
  • Author response
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242