Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editor's Briefing

Editor's Briefing

Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (608): 115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X663208
Roger Jones
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

EMBEDDING BEST PRACTICE

Bill Gates gave the Richard Dimbleby lecture a few weeks ago, entitled The Impatient Optimist. He spoke passionately and inspiringly at the Royal Institution, watched by the current and past Presidents of the Royal Society, on his programme to eradicate poliomyelitis globally.

Bill and Melinda Gates’ massive philanthropic commitment to health care began when they first learnt about the impact of rotavirus-induced diarrhoea, that at the time caused half a million child deaths, with preventive measures being carried out only in the world’s richer nations. The Gates were later inspired by meeting Bill Fahey, one of the giants of global smallpox eradication, in Seattle and finally turned their attention to polio. The disease, which was once a universal scourge, with over one third of a million cases reported as recently as 1988, is now almost eradicated; the only countries in which it remains endemic are Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Nigeria. The reasons for the failure of eradication in these countries have, of course, nothing to do with the efficacy of the vaccine, the commitment of healthcare workers or, even, the resources available to support the infrastructure of eradication programmes. Much more complex cultural and contextual factors are at work, which act as powerful blocks to the completion of the task. This in a sense, represents the ‘third translational step’ in getting research into practice. The first is to get the research out of the laboratory and into clinical trials, the second is the translation from experimental to clinical practice and in the community, and the third step is to ensure that best practice is established and universally embedded.

This issue of the BJGP is about best practice in the delivery of primary health care. A fascinating range of articles look at some important aspects of health care at home and abroad. In the UK John Campbell looks again at patients’ access to primary care, the role of the GP Satisfaction Survey, and the factors, such as access to appointments and the ability to make an appointment with a preferred doctor, in determining patients’ satisfaction with their care and with their practice. Jonathan Hammond and colleagues, at Manchester, rather than St Georges unfortunately (!), claim to have slain the dragon myth, by emphasising the contextual issues surrounding the roles of GP receptionists, whose work reflects not only personal discretion and preferences, but also the wider working patterns, values, and norms of the practice as well as staff dynamics and changing patient needs. Rod Sampson and colleagues from the Cairn Medical Practice in Inverness report an interesting study in which patients were able to choose their appointment length, from 5, 10, 15, and 20-minute appointments. Doing so was associated with greater patient empowerment and better time management in the consultation.

Further afield, Eric Galam and colleagues from Paris report on a rather depressing survey of over 4000 GP trainees in France, of whom a substantial proportion already seem to be experiencing burnout, and over 1% claim to have previously tried to commit suicide. Galam and colleagues comment on some steps that have already been taken to provide support for trainees in difficulties. Shabir Moosa, writing from Johannesburg, reports on an important survey of government and academic leaders in Africa, where it is clear that primary health care is still poorly understood by many senior figures, with hospital models of health care still dominating their thinking. Greater and more consistent advocacy for primary health care is needed to influence decision-making by political and medical leaders. This may represent one altruistic opportunity to export the NHS brand.

This year, following the publication of our critical appraisal toolkit, the BJGP is launching an initiative to support its reviewers. We rely on hundreds of unpaid, committed, and excellent reviewers, to whom we are enormously grateful, to shape the content of our Journal and, thereby, the medical literature and the evidence base. It is clear that we can and should do more to provide feedback on the quality of reviews, to provide examples of good practice, and to begin to establish a mentoring system that will allow seasoned reviewers to support less experienced colleagues in reviewing for us. More details of this initiative will be published on our website in the next few months.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2013
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 63 (608)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 63, Issue 608
March 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Editor's Briefing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Editor's Briefing
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (608): 115. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X663208

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Editor's Briefing
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (608): 115. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X663208
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • EMBEDDING BEST PRACTICE
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Editor's Briefing
  • Editor's Briefing
Show more Editor's Briefing

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242