Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Review

HIV testing: the danger of keeping secrets

Helen McElveen
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (609): 201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X665279
Helen McElveen
GP, West of Scotland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

How has stigma and lack of trust been allowed to overshadow information sharing and comprehensive clinical care within the NHS?

Results of HIV tests performed by sexual health services are not routinely communicated to primary care. The rationale for this is to protect patient confidentiality and encourage people to attend for testing if they feel they may be at risk. I find this disquieting on several levels. GPs deal with huge amounts of sensitive data regarding all aspects of their patients’ lives. All members of the primary healthcare team, who may indeed be local people, are bound by the rules of confidentiality. To actively withhold key medical information makes it impossible, and potentially dangerous, for the GP and their team to provide structured, holistic health care to patients who have not disclosed their positive HIV status.

In today’s culture, we are encouraged to apply the ethical principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice to communication and decision making. This has led to a shift from paternalism towards open discussion of difficult subjects and shared decision making. Doctors and patients alike have welcomed the mutual responsibility. I cannot understand why, despite massive changes in the treatment and prognosis of HIV infection over the past 30 years, the stigma associated with the condition in the 1980s is being propagated by this culture of secrecy.

The issue has nothing to do with protecting healthcare staff from blood borne viruses. Around one-quarter of people with HIV in the UK are undiagnosed and every staff member at risk of exposure to blood borne viruses has a responsibility to use personal protective equipment. But it does have to do with protecting patients: people with a lifelong multisystem disease requiring treatment with a combination of drugs, each with their own profile of side-effects and interactions.

With around 100 000 people with HIV living in the UK and over 6000 new HIV diagnoses in the country in 2011, this is rapidly becoming a significant issue. It seems we are clinging on to the values of The Medical Society for the Study of Venereal Diseases (established 1922), rather than embracing The British Society for Sexual Health and HIV’s current objective: ‘To advance public health so far as it is affected by sexually transmitted diseases and to promote and encourage the study of the public aspects of sexually transmitted diseases ...’1

Surely it’s time we changed this standard practice in order to protect the best interests of the patient?

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2013

REFERENCE

  1. 1.↵
    1. British Association for Sexual Health and HIV
    About BASHH (BASHH, Cheshire) http://www.bashh.org/about (accessed 6 Mar 2013).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 63 (609)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 63, Issue 609
April 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
HIV testing: the danger of keeping secrets
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
HIV testing: the danger of keeping secrets
Helen McElveen
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (609): 201. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X665279

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
HIV testing: the danger of keeping secrets
Helen McElveen
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (609): 201. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X665279
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCE
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

The Review

  • Tick. Tick. Tick ....
  • Made to measure?
  • Iain Bamforth
Show more The Review

Viewpoint

  • The NHS: have the rivets popped?
  • Bring Hippocrates to the people and save the NHS
  • Getting the swagger back into general practice
Show more Viewpoint

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

Tweets by @BJGPjournal

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242