Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editorials

Alcohol control strategies: the gap between evidence and practice

William Gilmore and Sir Ian Gilmore
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 396-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X670507
William Gilmore
Roles: Research Fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sir Ian Gilmore
Roles: Honorary Professor in Clinical Science
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

THE PROBLEM

‘Intoxicating liquor creates lawlessness, makes criminals, wrecks homes and brings trouble to innocent women and children.’ This quote from Thomas Jordan Jarvis (1836–1915) is as true now as it was in the 19th century. While our consumption per capita in the UK has not quite reached Victorian levels, it has more than doubled since World War II and alcohol-related illnesses, injuries, and deaths are now at an all-time high. Representatives of the drinks industry are quick to point out that data from national surveys have shown a fall over the past few years (during the financial downturn) in consumption figures. However, this has coincided with increasing ethnic diversity and more abstainers in the UK population, and those that are drinking are doing so in a more harmful way. It is also well known that there is a marked disparity between alcohol consumption figures from self-reported national surveys and from alcohol sales data. It has been estimated by Bellis et al1 from the volume of pure alcohol taxed in 2007/2008 that the average consumption of a drinking adult in England is 26 units per week, higher than surveys suggest and well above recommended limits of 14 units per week for women and 21 for men.

WHAT WORKS IN REDUCING ALCOHOL-RELATED HARM AND WHAT BARRIERS EXIST?

The evidence for effective public health policies is clear and well documented.2,3 Just as with tobacco, there is strong evidence that changes in price affect the amount of alcohol consumed and the levels of harm seen in that population. Regulating the physical availability of alcohol has been also shown to be an effective public health intervention. This includes measures such as placing restrictions on the hours and days of sale of alcohol and on the density of licensed premises in an area but also improving the enforcement of prohibiting sales to underage drinkers and those already intoxicated. Measures such as random breath testing and lowering blood alcohol concentration limits for driving have been shown to reduce alcohol-related road crashes in many countries. A study by RAND Europe4 showed that 10–15 year-olds in the UK are exposed to more television advertising than adults, and the evidence base shows that alcohol advertising is having an adverse effect, particularly on adolescent alcohol use.5 The existing industry self-regulation of alcohol advertising in the UK is clearly inadequate.

A recent example where the evidence is strongly in favour of public health intervention is setting a minimum unit price (MUP) for alcohol in the UK, where a minimum price would be set for every unit of alcohol sold. Extensive modelling by the University of Sheffield6 and studies from Canada7,8 (where this policy has been introduced in several provinces) have both highlighted the benefits of setting a minimum unit price in reducing alcohol consumption, hospital admissions, and deaths caused by alcohol. This is currently the top alcohol policy recommendation from the UK public health community,9 with the aim of increasing the price of the cheapest drinks that are often chosen by the heaviest drinkers and underage ones. This policy would affect the heavily discounted drinks available in off-licences and large supermarket chains rather than the price of a pint of beer or glass of wine in a pub, bar, or restaurant. Within the UK, the Scottish Government has passed MUP into law but is still embroiled in legal challenges from the Scotch Whisky Association and, potentially, the European Commission. In Northern Ireland there seems an appetite for pursuing MUP, but government in England and Wales appears to be bowing to industry and backbencher pressure in going back on the commitments it made to minimum pricing only 18 months ago. This is a watershed moment when policies with cast-iron evidence are in danger of being sacrificed. It was only last May that the UK Prime Minister, David Cameron, famously said: ‘We are going to introduce a new minimum unit price — so for the first time it will be illegal for shops to sell alcohol for less than this set price per unit. Of course, I know this won’t be universally popular. But the responsibility of being in government isn’t always about doing the popular thing. It’s about doing the right thing’.Will he?

WHAT IS THE POTENTIAL ROLE FOR GPs IN REDUCING ALCOHOL-RELATED HARM?

Even though there is a strong evidence base for population-level interventions to reduce alcohol consumption and related harm, with the size of the problem in the UK there is no time to wait for such measures to either be implemented or for the long-term benefits to ensue. ‘Upstream’ measures of regulation on price, availability, and marketing may have the largest effect but, as we see, are unlikely to find political favour.

Primary care is an ideal setting for early intervention and it is a cost-effective option. There is strong evidence to show that opportunistic early identification and brief advice administered by GPs and other health professionals is effective in reducing alcohol consumption.10 It has been shown that identification and brief advice is even more successful than smoking cessation programmes with one in eight people reducing their alcohol consumption to within safer levels after receiving simple advice.11 For patients identified through the screening tools as having dependence problems, referral to specialist alcohol treatment services should be sought. In addition to face-to-face training days offered by the RCGP in the management of alcohol problems in primary care, an online e-learning resource on identification, and brief advice in primary care has recently become available to primary care professionals.12

There is such a gap between effective, evidence-based policy and the realities of what our governments can deliver, particularly in Westminster, that we need to mobilise the healthcare workforce to target individuals as well as populations. This can be done in partnerships between primary and secondary care. An increasing number of acute hospitals have alcohol care teams, and the challenge is to make these available 7 days a week and to integrate these services with community alcohol services, as advocated by the British Society of Gastroenterology.13 Perhaps the recent move of public health into social care in England will be an opportunity to make the services ‘joined up’ for the millions of patients with alcohol problems and stop them ‘falling through the gap’.

Notes

Provenance

Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2013

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bellis M,
    2. Hughes K,
    3. Cook P,
    4. Morleo M
    (2009) Off Measure: How we underestimate the amount we drink (Alcohol Concern, London).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Babor T,
    2. Caetano R,
    3. Casswell S,
    4. et al.
    (2010) Alcohol: no ordinary commodity Research and public policy (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 2nd edn.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Stockwell T
    (2006) Alcohol supply, demand, and harm reduction: What is the strongest cocktail? Int J Drug Policy 17(4):269–277.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Winpenny E,
    2. Patil S,
    3. Elliot M,
    4. et al.
    (2012) Assessment of young people’s exposure to alcohol marketing in audiovisual and online media (Rand Europe, Cambridge).
  5. 5.↵
    1. Anderson P,
    2. de Bruijn A,
    3. Angus K,
    4. et al.
    (2009) Impact of alcohol advertising and media exposure on adolescent alcohol use: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Alcohol Alcohol 44(3):229–243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Purshouse R,
    2. Meier P,
    3. Brennan A,
    4. et al.
    (2010) Estimated effect of alcohol pricing policies on health and health economic outcomes in England: an epidemiological model. Lancet 375(9723):1355–1364.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Zhao J,
    2. Stockwell T,
    3. Martin G,
    4. et al.
    (2013) The relationship between minimum alcohol prices, outlet densities and alcohol-attributable deaths in British Columbia, 2002–09. Addiction 108(6):1059–1069.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Stockwell T,
    2. Zhao J,
    3. Martin G,
    4. et al.
    (2013) Minimum alcohol prices and outlet densities in British Columbia, Canada: estimates impacts on alcohol-attributable hospital admissions. Am J Public Health, [Epub ahead of print].
  9. 9.↵
    1. Gilmore I,
    2. Anderson W,
    3. Bauld L,
    4. et al.
    (2013) Health First: an evidence-based alcohol strategy for the UK (University of Stirling, Stirling).
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kaner EF,
    2. Beyer F,
    3. Dickinson HO,
    4. et al.
    (2007) Brief interventions for excessive drinkers in primary health care settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD004148.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Moyer A,
    2. Finney J,
    3. Swearingen C,
    4. Vergun P
    (2002) Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations. Addiction 97(3):279–292.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    New e-learning course for GPs to help patients with alcohol problems. http://www.rcgp.org.uk/news/2013/may/new-elearning-course-for-gps-to-help-patients-with-alcohol-problems.aspx (accessed 3 July 2013).
  13. 13.↵
    1. The British Society of Gastroenterology and Bolton NHS Foundation Trust
    (2012) Alcohol care teams: reducing acute hospital admissions and improving quality of care (BSG, London) http://arms.evidence.nhs.uk/resources/qipp/29420/attachment (accessed 3 July 2013).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 63 (613)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 63, Issue 613
August 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Alcohol control strategies: the gap between evidence and practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Alcohol control strategies: the gap between evidence and practice
William Gilmore, Sir Ian Gilmore
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 396-397. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X670507

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Alcohol control strategies: the gap between evidence and practice
William Gilmore, Sir Ian Gilmore
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 396-397. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X670507
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • THE PROBLEM
    • WHAT WORKS IN REDUCING ALCOHOL-RELATED HARM AND WHAT BARRIERS EXIST?
    • WHAT IS THE POTENTIAL ROLE FOR GPs IN REDUCING ALCOHOL-RELATED HARM?
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Socioeconomic deprivation and post-stroke care in the community
  • Advocating for patients through laboratory tests: what do GPs’ use of blood tests for suspected cancer tell us?
  • Diagnosis of prostate cancer in primary care: navigating updated clinical guidance
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242