Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

The Wow test in quality

Terry Kemple
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X670561
Terry Kemple
Horfield Health Centre, Lockleaze Road, Bristol, BS7 9RR. E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tk@elpmek.demon.co.uk
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

There is usually a Wow factor in the very highest quality. But there is often a Wow factor in the poorest quality. An editorial1 that suggests that the RCGP first started to define excellence in 2008, focuses on a process of remuneration (the Quality and Outcome Framework) as the current zenith of quality measurement and wants more research so that the concepts of quality should be tested until a consensus emerges of the key domains of components, passes the Wow test.

In 1985 the RCGP What Sort of Doctor report was published. This followed 4 years of developing systems to assess the quality of care by matching individual performance against defined and agreed criteria of competence. In the same year, the College published a major policy document Quality in General Practice. Subsequently, and for the last 20 years, other RCGP quality schemes with evolving measures of quality like the Fellowship of the RCGP by Assessment, the Quality Practice Award, and the Practice Accreditation Scheme have continued to do all that is suggested in this new paradigm. It was good idea in 1985 but it’s not a new idea in 2013. All that remains is to convince government to reward these schemes that have 30 years experience trying to ‘capture general practice quality in all its richness and complexity’.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2013

REFERENCE

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kordowicz M,
    2. Ashworth M
    (2013) Capturing general practice quality: a new paradigm? Br J Gen Pract 63(611):288–289.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 63 (613)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 63, Issue 613
August 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Wow test in quality
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Wow test in quality
Terry Kemple
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 403. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X670561

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The Wow test in quality
Terry Kemple
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 403. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X670561
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCE
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • It wasn’t always rosy …
  • Safety netting and follow-up (of babies’ eyes)
  • Social prescribing in ethnic minority communities
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242