Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Reducing inappropriate ENT referrals

Sridhayan Mahalingam, Chris Pepper and Pippa Oakeshott
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 404-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X670606
Sridhayan Mahalingam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Pepper
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pippa Oakeshott
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Cox and colleagues1 highlight the problem of increasing numbers of outpatient referrals, many of which are thought to be inappropriate. Ear, nose, and throat (ENT) problems are common in primary care2 and appropriate referral is crucial. We investigated GP referrals to the one-stop emergency ENT clinic at St George’s Hospital, London. Criteria for referral to this clinic include: otitis externa (needing microsuction), recurrent epistaxis, fractured nose (needs to be seen within 7–10 days of injury), foreign bodies in the ear, sudden unilateral sensorineural hearing loss, and Bell’s palsy.

We collected prospective data on 100 consecutive primary care referrals in April–May 2013. The patients’ mean age was 41 years (range 1–88 years), 24 were children aged <12 years, and 47 were male. Referrals were triaged by an ENT senior registrar or consultant and 65 were accepted.

Of the remaining 35 referrals deemed inappropriate, seven were for microsuction of wax, six patients had neck lumps or hoarse voice (2-week referral), three had otitis media (referral to paediatric/general ENT clinic), two had possible cholesteatoma (referral to otology clinic), four had tinnitus or vertigo (referral to audiovestibular clinic), two had chronic sinusitis (referral to rhinology clinic), two had hearing aid problems (referral to audiology clinics), and nine had other conditions.

We believe that recognition of criteria for emergency ENT clinic referrals and an awareness of the many different subspecialist ENT clinics available may help GPs refer more appropriately and provide efficient care. Hospitals should keep GPs regularly updated in their acceptance criteria for the different clinics and publish this information on their websites. This is important in view of Cox and colleagues’1 findings that referral management schemes are expensive and do not seem to reduce outpatient attendance rates.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2013

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Cox JM,
    2. Steel N,
    3. Clark AB,
    4. et al.
    (2013) Do referral-management schemes reduce hospital attendances? Time-series evaluation of primary care referral management. Br J Gen Pract doi:10.3399/bjgp13X668177.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Grifffiths E
    (1979) Incidence of ENT problems in general practice. J R Soc Med 72(10):740–742.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 63 (613)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 63, Issue 613
August 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reducing inappropriate ENT referrals
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reducing inappropriate ENT referrals
Sridhayan Mahalingam, Chris Pepper, Pippa Oakeshott
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 404-405. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X670606

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Reducing inappropriate ENT referrals
Sridhayan Mahalingam, Chris Pepper, Pippa Oakeshott
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 404-405. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X670606
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Realising the potential of Improving Access to Psychological Therapies for older adults
  • Identifying patients at risk of psychosis
  • It wasn’t always rosy …
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242