Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Out Of Hours

Embracing the future of medical journals

Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X670723
Euan Lawson
and Director of Community Studies, Lancaster Medical School, Furness College, Lancaster University, Lancaster.
Roles: Deputy Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Figure1

Medical journals are far from perfect. A former editor of the BMJ, Richard Smith, wrote a whole book setting out the problems.1 Bias of various hues has plagued the literature. Conflicts of interest abound, authorship has been controversial, and the pharmaceutical industry and commercial pressures have influenced content. There is the ongoing challenge of the peer review process that stubbornly refuses to be superseded by anything better. All the flaws have been highlighted and debated.

Journals have already moved a long way in less than a generation. Britpop was in full swing, Blur versus Oasis, when I was at medical school handsearching the Index Medicus. Medical journals were roughly on a par with telephone directories when it came to readability and it required physical stamina to complete the briefest of literature reviews. The only way to access academic papers was to trawl around the university library dragging the heavy volumes to the photocopier. I’d lean on the spines trying to flatten the middle sections of the tightly bound volumes while praying the copier wouldn’t jam again. It is a scarcely imaginable process to those raised with the internet.

While online medical journals have improved accessibility, many of us will have experienced the frustration of finding the perfect review article only to discover it’s sitting behind a paywall. Paper-short, web-long articles are the norm at the BJGP and open access is being embraced. The internet extends the reach of journals in ways that are only just being explored. Most of us will own socks that are older than Twitter and Facebook yet they already seem to have become ingrained in our culture. There are plans to continue to develop the online presence for the Journal. It also opens up a channel for post-publication review that we should all welcome.

Academics may feel they know exactly where they stand with medical journals. The role of the front section of the BJGP is relatively clear. The BJGP is an international primary care medical journal striving to publish primary care research of the highest standard and to add to the scientific record. Some of the research will have immediate and obvious implications for practice. However, research is more commonly about the slow accumulation of knowledge, inching towards consensus. That is an essential function of any medical journal.

GPs going about the daily business of seeing patients may be less sure about the BJGP. We all know that the research in the medical journals informs the guidelines, which in turn translate into clinical practice. For many, the BJGP is their most tangible contact with the College. The section at the back of the BJGP (Out of Hours) has taken a wider view of the world of general practice. Those pages have, under the expert guidance of the outgoing Deputy Editor, Alec Logan, provided stimulation and opened up reflection and discussion on the nature of general practice. That also seems to me an essential function of a medical journal.

These competing functions get to the heart of the role of a medical journal. They have always given me a sense of everything medicine should aspire to be in the modern world of health care. They are deeply rooted in a scientific evidence-based approach; yet there is still scope for that essential debate and exploration of all the grey areas that adds humanity to clinical practice.

The flaws in medical journals highlighted by Richard Smith are being addressed but in tackling them it is erroneous to create a false distinction between GPs and academics. Many will be both but even at the ends of the spectrum clinicians will take a scholarly approach to their practice and academics are motivated to improve patient care. More than anything I believe that an international academic journal publishing high-calibre research can offer engaging content that fulfils the needs of both academics and coalface clinicians; they are not mutually exclusive. Journals offer a unique opportunity to help patients come to better decisions alongside well-informed healthcare teams. I would value your feedback because now, more than ever, the future of medical journals truly involves the readers.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2013

REFERENCE

  1. 1.↵
    1. Smith R
    (2006) The trouble with medical journals (The Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd, London).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 63 (613)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 63, Issue 613
August 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Embracing the future of medical journals
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Embracing the future of medical journals
Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 423. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X670723

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Embracing the future of medical journals
Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 423. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X670723
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCE
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Bad Medicine: Medical student numbers
  • Books: His Bloody Project. Documents Relating to the Case of Roderick Macrae
  • Yonder: Physician assistants, timewasting, nursing homes, and social media
Show more Out of Hours

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242