Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Out of Hours

Stop penalising UK GPs returning from abroad

David Berger
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X670796
David Berger
Locum DMO in Emergency Medicine, Broome Hospital, Broome, Western Australia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

I am a UK GP working in general practice and emergency medicine in a remote part of Australia and have been out of the UK for 6 months. I am learning more than I have ever learned before and my clinical skills have improved out of all recognition. As the situation stands, however, should I wish to return to the UK in another 18 months I will be subject to the same blanket requirements for formal re-testing; a lengthy, bureaucratic, and costly process, as an individual who has not worked in clinical medicine at all for this period. Despite repeated private and public requests to clarify their position, the recent data from Morison et al and their colleagues at the Committee of General Practice Education Directors (COGPED) still fails to stratify those returning to general practice in the UK after an absence of more than 2 years.1 They refer to ‘the assessment of those returning to UK general practice after a period away from clinical practice’ and do not tell us how their extremely limited data can be stratified according to those who have been working as GPs (even though abroad) and those who have not been working at all. No one will contest that individuals out of clinical practice completely for an extended period require assessment and likely a period of refreshment before returning. Some may not be suitable to return at all.

However, they apply the 2-year criterion to anyone out of UK general practice, not just out of general practice. This is clearly absurd: just look at my case. What possible purpose will be served by making me take a basic written exam, then a clinical skills OSCE, and forcing me to do an unpaid clinical attachment of indeterminate length? Morison knows well cases such as that of a returning GP who had been working a few days longer than 2 years in Australia as a full-time GP and was required to undergo formal assessment on their return to the UK, a process that lasted more than 4 months in that case. There are many others.

I have previously asked Morison and Irish to divulge the recipe of the ‘special super secret sauce’ in UK general practice, the knowledge of which apparently deteriorates over time, and means a GP working as a GP in countries such as Australia, New Zealand, or Canada loses basic clinical competence after 2 years and then becomes unsafe to work in the UK. No such recipe has ever been forthcoming. As a GP working currently in Australia, it is clear that the standard of care and level of competence here are in many cases higher than in the UK. If the ‘special super secret sauce’ of UK general practice relates to knowledge about the QOF, CCGs, and other particularities pertinent only to the UK, then this could easily be dealt with by a short refresher course on UK procedures on top of a clinical interview and the taking up of references. It does not require pointless basic clinical reassessment lasting many months, costing large amounts of money, and delivering high levels of anguish to the individuals concerned.

Morison and his colleagues should wake up to the magnitude of the UK’s current and worsening GP recruitment crisis and stop excluding experienced GPs from returning from other first world health economies on the basis of what appears to be grossly inadequate data (both in terms of numbers and quality), underpinned by a parochialism surprising in this day and age. Until they present clear data of high quality that shows that UK-trained GPs in current general practice overseas in the developed world are failing basic clinical assessments when returning to the UK and are therefore unsafe to practise, then their position and that of the COGPED will continue to lack credibility among the profession.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2013

REFERENCE

  1. 1.↵
    1. Morison J,
    2. Irish B,
    3. Main P
    (2013) Not just another primary care workforce crisis. [letter]. Br J Gen Pract 63(607):72.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 63 (613)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 63, Issue 613
August 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Stop penalising UK GPs returning from abroad
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Stop penalising UK GPs returning from abroad
David Berger
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 430. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X670796

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Stop penalising UK GPs returning from abroad
David Berger
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 430. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X670796
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCE
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

Out of Hours

  • Viewpoint: Redundant subjectivity?
  • Books: A Layman’s Guide to Psychiatry and Psychoanalysis
  • Can compassion help cure health-related disorders?
Show more Out of Hours

Viewpoint

  • The NHS: have the rivets popped?
  • Bring Hippocrates to the people and save the NHS
  • Getting the swagger back into general practice
Show more Viewpoint

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242