Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Out of Hours

Tick. Tick. Tick ....

Tim Senior
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X670840
Tim Senior
Tharawal Aboriginal Corporation, Airds.
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

‘... And how often have you felt worthless in the last 4 weeks?’

He struggled to hold back a tear, as he said ‘Well. Most ... All ... all the time really.’

‘You’ve scored 36 points!’

In what parallel world is that the right response to someone saying they feel worthless? Well, in our world of valid, reliable scoring charts. You’ll recognise that question as the last question on the K-10 questionnaire which measures mental distress. Its intended outcome is a number. It’s very hard to feel for someone who is ‘36’ but the patient doesn’t feel ‘36,’ the patient feels worthless.

Another patient, let’s call him Frank, another discussion. In Australia we have a system where performing a health assessment opens up limited access to government-funded allied health. I went through our computer checklist of questions: ‘Can you cook for yourself? Can you manage stairs?’ For each question he thought deeply and then told me a story about how he managed. Eventually his wife interrupted him ‘No, don’t waste the doctor’s time. He just wants a yes/no’. My frustration was that this man’s answers were exactly what I wanted to hear: they told me so much more than Yes or No. I encouraged him to continue. We all agreed that we could happily fill out this form, and we would know nothing more about Frank. He carried on with his stories, slightly shorter now. We all ended that consultation a little happier.

It’s common for us to bemoan checklists in medicine, but the currents move in the other direction. We attempt to standardise our patients with symptom scores and risk calculators. Even our phones are full of them and we get to call them smart. We get to enter this information into a clinical record, and — what fun — we get to pull it out again, anonymised, to tell us how well we are doing. But my computerised medical record, poor thing, struggles with free text in a way that even the most inept medical student doesn’t. So for the sake of my audit trail and my managers, my patient had better feel 36 and answer Y or N.

So, enter the quantified self-movement, where patients swim with this current. They empower themselves, by knowing all their numbers, keeping tally of their blood pressure and cholesterol. They will know whether they are a Y or an N, and possibly whether they are a 36, too, though I’ve never seen mental health discussed as part of this movement. I imagine future quantified self-clinics as a succession of consultations, where two people spend time discussing some numbers without ever really finding out or discussing anything important. Michael Balint may have called this the collusion of numerology.

What’s to stop this from happening? Well, our patients will. As soon as they find a doctor who listens to their story, who acts as witness, the doctor becomes ‘theirs’. Both doctors and patients know when this has happened and know it provides something useful, important even. Of course, there are scoring systems in development for measuring this interpersonal connection, though I’m not sure what we will have succeeded at when my patient scores less than 36 and I am greater than 24. I hope I’m more valid and reliable than that.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2013
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 63 (613)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 63, Issue 613
August 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tick. Tick. Tick ....
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Tick. Tick. Tick ....
Tim Senior
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 435. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X670840

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Tick. Tick. Tick ....
Tim Senior
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (613): 435. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X670840
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

Out of Hours

  • Every home should have one: the critical role of the research librarian
  • Fakery and science
  • Viewpoint: Redundant subjectivity?
Show more Out of Hours

The Review

  • Made to measure?
  • Sticking to this Soulless Quest
Show more The Review

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242