Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

The RTI clinical iceberg

Helen Salisbury, Christine A’Court, Caroline Jones, Susannah Fleming, Daniela Gonçalves and Matthew Thompson
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (614): 461-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X671524
Helen Salisbury
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine A’Court
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Jones
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susannah Fleming
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniela Gonçalves
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Thompson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The paper ‘Expectations for consultations and antibiotics for respiratory tract infection in primary care; the RTI clinical iceberg’1 has striking workload implications for GPs given that 58% of the UK population surveyed reported an RTI in the preceding 6 months, for which one in five had contacted their GP surgery. It is an important finding that over half of those patients contacting the GP expected antibiotics (53.1%).

However, exactly how big the problem of over-prescribing is cannot be determined from this study as the survey did not ask responders if they had been prescribed antibiotics for an RTI. Presenting data on expectations for antibiotic prescription for an RTI next to data on antibiotic prescription for any condition, as the ‘clinical iceberg in RTI’ (Figure 2 in the article), is perhaps misleading. Furthermore, although we are told that ‘97% of participants were prescribed an antibiotic when they asked for one’, we are not told how many of the 74% who did not ask for antibiotics were prescribed them. Therefore it is not possible to attribute antibiotic prescription to patient demand.

Time pressures in primary care undoubtedly run counter to the need to minimise inappropriate antibiotic prescription as it takes longer to perform a full clinical and psychosocial evaluation of a patient, with education and safety-netting, than to issue an antibiotic. The paper overlooks the psychosocial drivers behind patients’ attendance with minor RTIs, presumably because they did not emerge as themes in the qualitative interviews; that those of lower socioeconomic status were more likely to have contacted their GP surgery than those of higher socioeconomic status hints at the possibility of life difficulties, coping skills, and educational attainment all influencing the need to consult in RTI.

On a more positive note, it is encouraging to learn that among the 14% of patients given a delayed prescription, a large minority (38%) did not collect them, confirming the usefulness of this strategy.

That 47% patients with RTIs consulted because their symptoms had not improved after several days confirms that patients often have unrealistic expectations about symptom or illness duration.2 Patient education on this topic needs to be delivered effectively by GPs in their consultations, and in any public health campaign to reduce demand.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2013

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. McNulty CAM,
    2. Nichols T,
    3. French DP,
    4. et al.
    (2013) Expectations for consultations and antibiotics for respiratory tract infection in primary care: the RTI Clinical iceberg. Br J Gen Pract doi:10.3399/bjgp13X669149.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ebell MH,
    2. Lundgren J,
    3. Youngpairoj S
    (2013) How long does a cough last? Comparing patients’ expectations with data from a systematic review of the literature. Ann Fam Med 11(1):5–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 63 (614)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 63, Issue 614
September 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The RTI clinical iceberg
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The RTI clinical iceberg
Helen Salisbury, Christine A’Court, Caroline Jones, Susannah Fleming, Daniela Gonçalves, Matthew Thompson
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (614): 461-462. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X671524

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The RTI clinical iceberg
Helen Salisbury, Christine A’Court, Caroline Jones, Susannah Fleming, Daniela Gonçalves, Matthew Thompson
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (614): 461-462. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X671524
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying patients at risk of psychosis
  • Social prescribing in ethnic minority communities
  • It wasn’t always rosy …
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242