Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

The RTI clinical iceberg

Jan Matthys
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (614): 462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X671533
Jan Matthys
UZ Ghent, 6K3, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium. E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jan.matthys@ugent.be
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

In their NICE study on expectations for consultations and antibiotics for respiratory tract infection in primary care, the authors describe the point of view from the patients in an RTI clinical iceberg; the authors come to the conclusion that most who ask for antibiotics are prescribed them.1

In the triade patient–doctor–society, from the point of view of the society, as mentioned by the authors, more and more countries do national public campaigns to promote appropriate use of antibiotics in the community.

Otherwise, from the point of view of the doctor, one can also ask questions about the ICE (Ideas, Concerns, Expectations) of patients in general practice consultations, and their relation with medication prescribing. Now, do most patients expect antibiotics? Surely not.

In a study on ICE, an analysis of 350 new contacts showed that the expression/unveiling of expectations of patients (P = 0.009, OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.2 to 3.4) was associated with not prescribing new medication (dichotomised into the categories present/absent); in a subgroup analysis of respiratory complaints (n = 90), evidence was even found for fewer antibiotic prescriptions when two or three ICE components were present, compared to the group with no or only one ICE component, namely 6/36 versus 20/54 prescriptions of antibiotics (P = 0.056, OR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.10 to 1.04).2

The conclusion of McNulty et al, may give the impression that patients especially expect antibiotics and this is not the truth. As many patients who contact their GP surgery expect advice and reassurance rather than antibiotics, there is an opportunity for GP practices to give more advice about how patients may relieve symptoms. Systematically disclosing the patients’ real expectations and concerns could lead to less unnecessary use of antibiotics.

There remains an important link between the stages of the ICEberg, namely how the GP deals with request of patients for antibiotics.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2013

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. McNulty CA,
    2. Nichols T,
    3. French DP,
    4. et al.
    (2013) Expectations for consultations and antibiotics for respiratory tract infection in primary care: the RTI clinical iceberg. Br J Gen Pract doi:10.3399/bjgp13X669149.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Matthys J,
    2. Elwyn G,
    3. Van Nuland M,
    4. et al.
    (2009) Patients’ ideas, concerns, and expectations (ICE) in general practice: impact on prescribing. Br J Gen Pract doi:10.3399/bjgp09X394833.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 63 (614)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 63, Issue 614
September 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The RTI clinical iceberg
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The RTI clinical iceberg
Jan Matthys
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (614): 462. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X671533

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The RTI clinical iceberg
Jan Matthys
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (614): 462. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X671533
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • It’s time to look again at GP funding
  • Inequalities in CKD management can be overcome
  • Changes in patient experience associated with growth and collaboration in general practice
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242