Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Out of Hours

The compassionate organisation

Trisha Greenhalgh
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (614): 481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X671669
Trisha Greenhalgh
GP in north London, Professor of Primary Health Care at Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London. E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: p.greenhalgh@qmul.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Figure1

The Francis Inquiry into the Mid-Staffordshire Hospital Trust makes sobering reading.1‘Patients were routinely neglected’, says the press release, ‘by a Trust that was preoccupied with cost cutting, targets, and processes and which lost sight of its fundamental responsibility to provide safe care.’

Largely as a result of profound staff shortages, basic elements of care were neglected. Patients were left in soiled sheets or sitting on commodes for hours; food and drinks were placed out of reach, and so on.

Like Robert Francis, I find these stories deeply shocking. But I am also shocked that having framed the problem squarely as one of lack of compassion, almost all his recommendations relate to documents or procedures. For example: ‘The Board should institute a programme of improving the arrangements for audit ...’‘The Trust should review its record-keeping procedures …’.‘The Board should review the Trust’s arrangements for the management of complaints …’

When my demented, dying father was admitted to hospital a few years ago, I drew great comfort from the relationship he developed with one particular nurse. It was characterised not by formal procedure or excellent records (although these may have existed) but by mutual positive regard, frequent laughter, some mischievous mutual teasing, and a great deal of physical touching. The nurse once showed me Dad’s smooth, sweet-smelling, pressure sore-free buttocks and said he’d spent hours polishing that bum.

This was compassionate care, and it illustrates a paradox. Francis’ recommendations are hard to contest. Yet by requiring more staff time to be spent following procedures and documenting tasks, they unwittingly leave less time for laughter, mischief, and bum polishing. Whereas Francis appears to know his onions for analysing the problem, his bureaucratic solutions have never struck me as evidence based.

I was delighted, therefore, to find a series of articles in the October 2012 issue of the Academy of Management Review (see for example, this introductory overview to the special issue2) on ‘the compassionate organization’. The authors of this review begin by carefully defining compassion not as a set of rules but as a virtue and the moral basis of society. They ask, ‘What does an organisation look like when its organising principles are based on the logics and principles of caring and compassion?’

The research community have only begun to address this question. The compassionate organisation humanises both its staff and its clients as people who suffer, people who care, and people who individually and collectively may respond with emotion to adversity. The compassionate organisation supports and shapes compassionate behaviour by its members, partly through appropriate incentives, rewards, and procedures but mainly by recognising that emotions — feeling, caring, loving, yearning — are an integral component of our rationality, not something that distorts or detracts from it.

The compassionate organisation, suggest Rynes et al views its staff not as independent, self-sufficient actors but as inter-related and interdependent. It fosters narrative practices — depicting telling moments, contextualising struggles, and constructing future-oriented stories — among team members that serve to institutionalise an ethic of care. Psychological studies link such narrative practices with constructs such as team resilience (so lacking in Mid Staffs).

Across the collection of research papers runs a common conclusion: rather than a tightening of procedure, the solutions to lack of compassion in an organisation centre on people, relationships, and generating collective narratives. As we all try to find time in our busy lives to implement procedures and complete our quality tick-boxes, let us also make time to celebrate and nurture the human foundations of our compassionate organisations.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2013

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Francis R
    (2013) Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Stationery Office, London).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Rynes SL,
    2. Bartunek JM,
    3. Dutton JE,
    4. Margolis JD
    (2012) Care and compassion through an organizational lens: opening up new possibilities. Acad Manage Rev 37(4):503–523.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 63 (614)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 63, Issue 614
September 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The compassionate organisation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The compassionate organisation
Trisha Greenhalgh
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (614): 481. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X671669

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The compassionate organisation
Trisha Greenhalgh
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (614): 481. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X671669
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

Out of Hours

  • Yonder: Physician assistants, timewasting, nursing homes, and social media
  • The chronotherapy of hypertension: or the benefit of taking blood pressure tablets at bedtime
  • Every home should have one: the critical role of the research librarian
Show more Out of Hours

Outside the Box

  • Five biases of new technologies
  • All change on the life support course
Show more Outside the Box

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242