Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Out of Hours

GP access — time for a radical solution?

Ashley Liston
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (614): 483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X671687
Ashley Liston
GP, Encompass GP Surgery, Tyne and Wear.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The recently published Patient’s Association report entitled Primary Care: Access Denied? makes uncomfortable reading for GPs.1 Fifty-seven per cent of responders stated that they felt that booking a GP appointment was either ‘very difficult’ or ‘could have been easier’. Almost two-thirds of people waited longer than 48 hours to book an appointment and one in three were unable to book at least 48 hours in advance. One in five responders stated that they needed to take time off work to see their GP which, when weighted against working age translates to more than one-third.

There are some GPs around the country who are adopting a radical approach to try to address the perennial and increasing problem of GP access. This involves rapid-response telephone consulting where every request for a GP consultation results in a GP calling the patient back within 60 minutes. A consultation takes place on the phone which in the majority of cases addresses the patient’s problem or query. The minority who need to be seen are asked when they would like to be seen. Most request a same day appointment which as a result of the efficiency of system can almost invariably be provided. GPs will often indicate that a nurse practitioner would be the most appropriate person to deal with the problem or, when continuity in care is needed with a particular GP, this is arranged.

The experience of most surgeries is that over 90% of patients prefer this approach to accessing their GPs. Not only does it revolutionise access to GP services but for patients who work, frail older people who struggle to get out, or anyone who simply wants some timely advice without leaving their house, it is extremely convenient. Demand is managed but far more importantly, clinical risk is managed by a skilled GP. The reception staff find their lives transformed as they relinquish the role of gatekeeper and the label of dragon.2 The constant negotiation with frustrated and disgruntled patients ceases and they are able to focus on other pressing administrative tasks in the office.

The CCGs are increasingly interested in this model. The evidence from practices that have adopted this approach is consistently showing reductions in A&E attendance of at least 20%.3 If you can be confident that your GP practice will see you or your child the same day, then why would you travel to your local A&E to wait 3–4 hours to be seen for what most patients know is not an accident or an emergency? But for many patients this remains the default mode to accessing NHS services driven by an assumption that you can never get an appointment at the GP surgery.

GPs can find the changes quite a culture shock. Fears about increased medicolegal risk can be managed through the application of important risk-reduction principles.4 Concerns about missed non-verbal cues or physical signs can equally be reduced through the development of skills in compensatory telephone behaviours and recognition of para-verbal cues.5 Understanding that the same skills in good communication and consulting face-to-face can be developed and honed on the telephone is important and requires dedicated training.6

The role of the GP as NHS gatekeeper has traditionally been seen as a means of managing referrals to secondary care. This expertise is increasingly being channelled into the CCG activities but could equally be applied to managing access to GP’s own services. Time is the most precious NHS resource GPs have. Optimising the use of this limited resource and ensuring it addresses the needs of all patients including hard to reach and disadvantaged groups of patients is something GPs need to take seriously.7

The NHS is an increasingly complex and potentially confusing place for patients. A core role of the GP is to act as the patient’s advocate helping them navigate to the most appropriate community or hospital-based service. Unfortunately it is a role that seems to be relinquished when it comes to helping patients access care provided by their own surgeries. Rapid response telephone consultations may be one potential solution.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2013

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. The Patients Association
    (2013) Primary care review vol II Primary care: access denied? (The Patients Association, Middlesex) http://www.patients-association.com/Portals/0/PCR_Vol-II%20(Access%20Denied)_Final.pdf (accessed 30 Jul 2013).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hammond J,
    2. Graveenhorst K,
    3. Funnel E,
    4. et al.
    (2013) Slaying the dragon myth: an ethnographic study of receptionists in UK general practice. Br J Gen Pract doi:10.3399/bjgp13X664225.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Longman H
    Comparison of mode of access to GP telephone consultation and effect on A&E usage, http://www.patient-access.org.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Comparison-of-access-modes-AE-effect-v2.pdf (accessed 16 Jul 2013).
  4. 4.↵
    1. Car J,
    2. Sheik A
    (2003) Telephone consultations. BMJ 326(7396):966–999.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Tanned D
    (1992) That’s not what I meant! How conversational style makes or breaks your relations with others (Virago Press Ltd, London).
  6. 6.↵
    1. Car J,
    2. Freeman GK,
    3. Partridge MR,
    4. Sheikh A
    (2004) Improving quality and safety of telephone based delivery of care: teaching telephone consultation skills. Qual Saf Health Care 13(1):2–3.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. NHS Commissioning Board
    (2013) Everyone counts: planning for patients 2013/14 (NHS Commissioning Boards, Leeds).
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 63 (614)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 63, Issue 614
September 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
GP access — time for a radical solution?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
GP access — time for a radical solution?
Ashley Liston
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (614): 483. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X671687

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
GP access — time for a radical solution?
Ashley Liston
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (614): 483. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X671687
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

Out of Hours

  • Fakery and science
  • Viewpoint: Redundant subjectivity?
  • Books: A Layman’s Guide to Psychiatry and Psychoanalysis
Show more Out of Hours

Viewpoint

  • The NHS: have the rivets popped?
  • Bring Hippocrates to the people and save the NHS
  • Getting the swagger back into general practice
Show more Viewpoint

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242