Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editorials

Female genital mutilation: everyone’s problem

Janice Rymer and Norma O’Flynn
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (615): 515-516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X673586
Janice Rymer
Dean of Undergraduate Medicine, Professor of Gynaecology, King’s College London School of Medicine, London.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Norma O’Flynn
GP, Hurley Clinic, London.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

eLetter submission guidelines

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com. PLEASE NOTE: your email address will be published.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Response to the FGM editorial
    Maryiam Yasin
    Published on: 17 December 2013
  • Published on: (17 December 2013)
    Page navigation anchor for Response to the FGM editorial
    Response to the FGM editorial
    • Maryiam Yasin, Medical Student
    • Other Contributors:

    In response to the publication released by Janice Rymer and Norma O'Flynn on female genital mutilation (FGM), we are writing to give supporting arguments towards what is currently a well-publicised dilemma.

    Rymer and O'Flynn raise an important point, which stems around the belief that we must change the current perception of FGM being an issue that is foreign and irrelevant in our society, to the belief that it...

    Show More

    In response to the publication released by Janice Rymer and Norma O'Flynn on female genital mutilation (FGM), we are writing to give supporting arguments towards what is currently a well-publicised dilemma.

    Rymer and O'Flynn raise an important point, which stems around the belief that we must change the current perception of FGM being an issue that is foreign and irrelevant in our society, to the belief that it is an essential problem, which needs to be tackled from our own doorstep. Despite the various difficulties in attaining the true numbers of those affected by the practice, it is estimated that around 280,000 women across the UK are affected; including many young girls who are at risk.

    The significance of primary care cannot be underestimated and as the authors state, there are many ways that GPs and primary care teams can help with this matter. Being the first port of call within the community allows them to hold a very privileged position to be able to engage actively with FGM-affected communities, addressing their unique needs, and safeguarding children by providing adequate support.

    In order for GPs to be able to sufficiently tackle the problem, they need to have sufficient knowledge on both the practice and the main medical issues as well as be aware of UK law and national guidelines. We have investigated the knowledge, attitudes and practices of GP's (in Network 5, Hammersmith & Fulham) towards FGM by using online surveys to identify barriers to GP engagement within affected communities to determine training needs.

    Our study shows that of the GPs surveyed, the majority have limited understanding of FGM including the definition and main demographics. However, they lack knowledge on the associated health issue, the UK regulations and availability of local specialist services. Many further lack confidence in discussing these health and legal implications with FGM -affected women.

    It is of concern that GP practice in general was often not consistent with national guidelines and only a minority were aware of the existence of the respective guidelines. Only a small proportion of GPs actually received any training on FGM.

    It is reassuring however, that the majority of GPs were aware of their need for further training and have requested this. Recommendations for the future must be focused on the need for more training for GPs. A recent increase in the awareness of FGM in the media has brought a distressing and violent truth of the abuse of women and with it, the much required awareness. However, there is still a long way to go and it is our duty as Rymer and O'Flynn so rightly stress, for GPs and those who are in the position to influence, to be informed and adequately trained in order for this sad reality to come to an end.

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 63 (615)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 63, Issue 615
October 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Female genital mutilation: everyone’s problem
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Female genital mutilation: everyone’s problem
Janice Rymer, Norma O’Flynn
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (615): 515-516. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X673586

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Female genital mutilation: everyone’s problem
Janice Rymer, Norma O’Flynn
British Journal of General Practice 2013; 63 (615): 515-516. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X673586
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE TO FGM
    • FGM IN THE UK
    • PRIMARY CARE RESPONSE TO FGM
    • THE FUTURE
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Socioeconomic deprivation and post-stroke care in the community
  • Advocating for patients through laboratory tests: what do GPs’ use of blood tests for suspected cancer tell us?
  • Diagnosis of prostate cancer in primary care: navigating updated clinical guidance
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242