Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Advertisement
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Out of Hours

Does The Future Have an NHS?

NHS SOS: How The NHS Was Betrayed — And How We Can Save It

David Misselbrook
British Journal of General Practice 2014; 64 (618): 40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X676537
David Misselbrook
GP, Dean Emeritus of the Royal Society of Medicine, Course Director of the Diploma of the Philosophy of Medicine of the Society of Apothecaries, and Senior Ethics Advisor. E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: David.Misselbrook@rsm.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Jacky Davis and Raymond Tallis Oneworld Publications, 2013 PB, 288pp, £8.99, 978-1780743288

The thesis of this book is simple. It states: ‘When the NHS was founded in 1948 it represented a historic, qualitative leap forward over any previous system, superseding the crisis ridden ‘mixed economy’ of health care …. which [was] unable to meet demand. Today, it is being replaced by a new ‘mixed economy’ of health care, a change that the public has never called for or supported, and a system that will cost more but be less efficient and deliver less care. Driven not by evidence but by ideology, the Tories have reinvented the flat tyre.’(p 19–20)

As a GP and thus a connoisseur of the follies of mankind in general I tend to be drawn more to cock-up theories than conspiracy theories. As I have learned more about the Health and Social Care Act and its surrounding regulations (the Act for short) over the past couple of years I have nonetheless been drawn to the conclusion that the likely effects of these ‘reforms’ will be to degrade the social solidarity promoted by the NHS, and that they are ideologically driven. Why else would the politicians fight so hard to block reasonable amendments suggested to mitigate obvious risks? The Act’s omission of the normal preliminary clause that obliges the Secretary of State for Health to ensure the provision of a comprehensive health service is a bit of a giveaway. This obligation was there in every previous Health Service Act. There can only be one possible interpretation to the government’s dogged determination first to leave it out and then to water it down to the point of futility.

This book seeks to answer some vital questions. Will the Act in some sense privatise the profitable parts of the NHS leaving behind a chaotic rump service for the disadvantaged? If so, was this the intention? Why have the media not properly reported such threats? And why (with the very honourable exception of Clare Gerada and a few others) haven’t our own medical leaders opposed these dangers more effectively?

This book gives a detailed narrative account of how these issues have unfolded. The book is onesided in the same sense that when I seek to protect my family from harm I am onesided. It is right that this stance should be examined, but the real question is whether the book is right. If it is then we are witnessing a shift away from the post-war liberal consensus that will downgrade the support our society gives to the vulnerable and sick. It threatens a major worsening of health inequalities. And it appears to be completely without democratic mandate. The Act did not appear in any party manifesto before the election and it cannot claim popular support by the UK population or by the healthcare professions.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

This book has a Marmite factor. I confess I am not a socialist, at least not with a capital S. This book too often assumes that the reader will be cheering it on from a socialist ticket. This irritated me; socialism is not the only vision for a healthy and caring society. If you are a socialist you will love every inch of this book. But if not then please get over your initial irritation and read it anyway. It is as broad and detailed an exploration of the current NHS ‘reforms’ as you will find. And many of us will share the authors’ passionate concern for what happens next.

Despite my occasional irritation at its tone I found the narrative of this book to be overwhelmingly credible and its arguments valid. If you have any interest in the future of the NHS or the future of UK medicine then buy it and read it. Its thesis — the degradation of social solidarity by conspiracy not accident — deserves scrutiny.

The book’s strap line is ‘how the NHS was betrayed — and how we can save it.’ It claims that the battle is not yet lost. It ends with a plan of action. Whatever your political views, if you care about the NHS then consider whether its core thesis rings true, and if so, what you should do about it.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2014
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 64 (618)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 64, Issue 618
January 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Does The Future Have an NHS?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Does The Future Have an NHS?
David Misselbrook
British Journal of General Practice 2014; 64 (618): 40. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X676537

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Does The Future Have an NHS?
David Misselbrook
British Journal of General Practice 2014; 64 (618): 40. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X676537
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

Out of Hours

  • Yonder: Physician assistants, timewasting, nursing homes, and social media
  • The chronotherapy of hypertension: or the benefit of taking blood pressure tablets at bedtime
  • Every home should have one: the critical role of the research librarian
Show more Out of Hours

Books

  • The Winter War
  • All Human Life and Loss in Palestine
  • Little Pieces of the Wreckage
Show more Books

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242