Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Out of Hours

Money, media, and general practice

Mohammed Ahmed Rashid
British Journal of General Practice 2014; 64 (619): 96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X677248
Mohammed Ahmed Rashid
The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Roles: NIHR Academic Clinical Fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Every day, across the country, GPs support their patients through major life events, engage with them in shared management plans and provide them with excellent and personalised end-of-life care. It comes as little surprise, therefore, that results from national patient satisfaction surveys tell us that an overwhelming majority of patients have trust and confidence in their GPs.1 The uniqueness of the patient–doctor relationship in primary care lies in the fact that it crosses family generations and spans the entire spectrum of health and illness. However, in the past decade, government policy and the subsequent media coverage has meant that GPs are increasingly associated with money and this poses a real threat to this important bond.

The introduction of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) in 2004 had a significant impact on the delivery of primary care in the UK but uncertainty about whether it meant real improvements for patients or not continues to date.2 Supporters argue that it has raised the standard of chronic disease management, encouraged aggressive preventive medicine and led to more structured care provision. Sceptics, meanwhile, argue that it has contributed to a moral decline among GPs, who have become incentivised by irrelevant targets and lost sight of the interests of individual patients. Additionally, although QOF produced some improvements for included conditions, there has been a decline in quality of care of non-included conditions.3

Irrespective of the clinical impact of this policy, it has certainly had a vast influence on the public perception of GPs. Newspaper headlines such as ‘GPs are focusing on patients who bring in bonuses’4 led to a widespread feeling of unease. It also led to much cynicism from secondary care colleagues, many of whom seemed to be ever frustrated by anecdotes of high GP incomes despite shorter training programmes and increasingly less antisocial hours. Indeed, the ‘QOF factor’ seemed to cause friction even within the primary care team. I’ve heard many practice and district nurses express their reluctance to perform blood tests or other interventions that were related to QOF points, which they felt were being performed only to line the pockets of the practice partners. The fact that these tasks are invariably for the benefit of the patients’ chronic disease management quickly loses focus when practice managers and partners are vociferously focused on maximising points in the last weeks before the QOF deadline.

Patients often misunderstand the association between balancing health budgets and the personal incomes of GPs. I’ve probed patients obstinately on the topic, although social decorum means that few would volunteer these views ordinarily. If a GP decides not to refer a patient or prescribe them an expensive drug, is that because of a concern about their own personal income? Of course not and clearly not all patients misinterpret things in this way. However, headlines such as ‘NHS reforms turn GPs into businessmen’5 clearly leaves much room for patients to wonder whether their doctors are focused on providing the highest quality care or just minimising costs, perhaps even for their own financial gain.

General practice in the UK has always been associated with money to some extent and although debates about whether GPs should lose their independent contractor status and become NHS employees are ongoing, partnership arrangements continue to be the norm throughout most of the country. Regardless of whether the core organisation of primary care changes or not, it seems clear that the more GPs are associated with money in the eyes of the media and public, the more potential exists for the unique relationship they have with patients to be damaged.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2014

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Croker JE,
    2. Swancutt DR,
    3. Roberts MJ,
    4. et al.
    (2013) Factors affecting patients’ trust and confidence in GPs: evidence from the English national GP patient survey. BMJ Open 3(5):e002762, doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002762, pii:.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kramer G
    (2012) Payment for Performance and the QOF: are we doing the right thing? Br J Gen Pract 62(596):e217–e219.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Doran T,
    2. Kontopantelis E,
    3. Valderas JM,
    4. et al.
    (2011) Effect of financial incentives on incentivised and non-incentivised clinical activities: longitudinal analysis of data from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework. BMJ 342:d3590.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Martin D
    (Nov 19, 2008) GPs ‘are focusing on patients who bring in bonuses’, claims Civitas report. Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1087120/GPs-focusing-patients-bring-bonuses-claims-Civitas-report.html (accessed 13 Jan 2014).
  5. 5.↵
    1. Goldacre B
    (Mar 24, 2013) As new NHS reforms turn GPs into businessmen, one doctor asks ... do you really want them to profit from the pills they prescribe? Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2298251/As-new-NHS-reforms-turn-GPs-businessmen-asks--Do-really-want-profit-pills-I-prescribe.html (accessed 13 Jan 2014).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 64 (619)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 64, Issue 619
February 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Money, media, and general practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Money, media, and general practice
Mohammed Ahmed Rashid
British Journal of General Practice 2014; 64 (619): 96. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X677248

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Money, media, and general practice
Mohammed Ahmed Rashid
British Journal of General Practice 2014; 64 (619): 96. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X677248
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

Out of Hours

  • Every home should have one: the critical role of the research librarian
  • Fakery and science
  • Viewpoint: Redundant subjectivity?
Show more Out of Hours

Viewpoint

  • The NHS: have the rivets popped?
  • Bring Hippocrates to the people and save the NHS
  • Getting the swagger back into general practice
Show more Viewpoint

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242