Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research

Identification of an updated set of prescribing-safety indicators for GPs

Rachel Spencer, Brian Bell, Anthony J Avery, Gill Gookey and Stephen M Campbell
British Journal of General Practice 2014; 64 (621): e181-e190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X677806
Rachel Spencer
Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Medical School, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham.
Roles: Academic clinical fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Bell
Roles: Postdoctoral researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony J Avery
Roles: Professor of general practice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gill Gookey
Roles: Primary care pharmacist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen M Campbell
Roles: Professor of primary care research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Number of indicators at each step of the consensus process.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Source descriptors of indicators

    Source (by age of publication, most recent first)Indicators reviewed from sourceIndicators used in round 1 of the consensus processSource detailsRelevance to prescribing safety indicators
    PINCER trial:16 cluster randomised pharmacist intervention trial116Outcome measures of the trial used as indicatorsUsed to inform the 2009 RCGP indicators
    Guthrie et al:17 Scottish general practice prevalence of inappropriate prescribing to vulnerable patients1512 (some crossover with other sources)New paper published since the RCGP indicator set was developed, indicators taken from consensusAll were considered related to safety but some overlapped with the 2009 RCGP indicators
    Wessel et al:6 prevalence of prescribing and monitoring errors3011 (some crossover with other sources)Data from US GP patients, indicators developed by the research teamSome drug–disease combinations represented quality rather than safety
    NORGEP:7 potentially inappropriate prescriptions for older people365 (all of these were also found in other sources)Based on Norwegian consensus panelMany drugs are not relevant to the UK or are no longer prescribed
    STOPP/START:5 Irish prescribing indicators6527Many relate to appropriateness rather than safetyUsed to inform the 2009 RCGP indicators
    Basger et al:8 Prescribing Indicators Tool for Elderly Australians484 (all of these were also found in other sources)Based on the most commonly prescribed drugs to Australians aged >65 yearsMany indicators reflect quality, especially secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease
    Raebel et al:9 laboratory safety monitoring in ambulatory patients93 (some crossover with other sources)Computerised tool used on US GP recordsSome recommendations were considered to have too little evidence in their favour
    Zhan et al:10 Potentially harmful drug–drug and drug–disease combinations56No formal indicators but 3 co-prescribing statements related to warfarinData from elderly US outpatients, indicators from consensusMany drug–disease combinations represented quality rather than safety
    PDRM:14 Manchester indicators on preventable drug-related morbidity294Successfully tested in English GP surgeriesUsed to inform the 2009 RCGP indicators
    Beers 2003 update:3 US indicators of prescribing safety in older people8920Although updated again in 2012 these indicators are US-specific and many cover situations not felt to be of high clinical importanceUsed to inform the 2009 RCGP indicators
    ACOVE:4 Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders2172Many process measures, minority related to safetyUsed to inform the 2009 RCGP indicators
    McLeod et al:11 defining inappropriate prescribing practices for older people716 (all of these were also found in other sources)Canadian consensus process dating from 1997Many indicators were outdated (new pharmacological evidence)
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Indicators rated as appropriate for assessing the safety of prescribing in general practice

    IndicatorRisk of harm (1 = low, 2 = moderate, 3 = high, 4 = extreme)
    A: Cardiovascular and respiratory disease
    1. Aspirin or clopidogrel prescribed to people with previous peptic ulcer or gastrointestinal bleed without gastroprotectiona3
    2. Prescription of aspirin at a dose >75mg daily for ≥1 month in a patient aged >65 years2
    3. Prescription of digoxin at a dose >125 μg daily in a patient with renal impairment (for example, CKD 3 or worse)3
    4. Prescription of digoxin at a dose of greater than 125 μg daily for a patient with heart failure who is in sinus rhythm3
    5. Prescription of diltiazem or verapamil in a patient with heart failurea3
    6. Prescription of a beta-blocker to a patient with asthma (excluding patients who also have a cardiac condition, where the benefits of beta-blockers may outweigh the risks)a3
    7. Prescription of a long-acting beta-2 agonist inhaler to a patient with asthma who is not also prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid3
    B: Central nervous system (including analgesics)
    8. Prescription of a benzodiazepine or Z drug for ≥21 days, in a patient aged >65 years,3
    who is not receiving benzodiazepines or Z drugs on a long-term basis
    9. Initiation of prescription of benzodiazepine or Z drugs for ≥21 days in a patient aged >65 years with depression3
    10. Antipsychotics prescribed for >6 weeks in the over 65s with dementia but not psychosisa3
    11. Amitriptyline at dose >75mg prescribed to a patient with heart failure, arrhythmia, heart block. or postural hypotension3
    12. Prescription of aspirin to a child aged ≤16 years2
    13. Bupropion prescribed to a patient with epilepsy3
    C: Anti-infective agents
    14. Prescription of mefloquine to a patient with a history of convulsionsa3
    D: Endocrine and metabolic
    15. Glitazone prescribed to patient with heart failurea3
    16. Metformin prescribed to a patient with renal impairment where the eGFR is ≤30ml/mina4
    17. Oral prednisolone prescribed at a dose ≥7.5mg daily for more than 3 months to the over 65s without co-prescription of osteoporosis-preventing treatmentsa3
    18. Modified-release potassium supplements prescribed to a patient with a history of peptic ulcer disease2
    E: Women’s health and urinary disorders
    19. Prescription of a combined hormonal contraceptive to a woman with a history of venous or arterial thromboembolism3
    20. Prescription of oral or transdermal oestrogens to a woman with a history of breast cancer3
    21. Prescription of oral or transdermal oestrogen without a progestogen in a woman with an intact uterus3
    22. Prescription of a combined hormonal contraceptive to a woman aged ≥35 years who is a current smoker3
    23. Prescription of a combined hormonal contraceptive to a woman with a body mass index of ≥40a3
    F: Immunosuppression
    24. Methotrexate prescriptions should state ‘weekly’3
    25. Methotrexate 2.5/10mg co-prescription3
    26. Methotrexate prescribed without folic acid3
    G: Musculoskeletal
    27. Concurrent use of two NSAIDS for more than 2 weeks (not including low-dose aspirin)3
    28. Prescription of an NSAID, without co-prescription of an ulcer-healing drug, to a patient with a history of peptic ulcerationa4
    29. Prescription of an NSAID in a patient with heart failurea3
    30. Prescription of an NSAID in a patient with chronic renal failure with an eGFR <45a4
    31. Allopurinol prescribed at a dose of >200mg/day to patients with renal impairment (eGFR <30 or CKDA)a3
    H: Hazardous co-prescriptions and allergy
    32. Prescription of warfarin and aspirin in combination (without co-prescription of gastroprotection)a3
    33. Concurrent use of warfarin and any antibiotic without monitoring the INR within 5 daysa,b4
    34. Prescription of warfarin in combination with an oral NSAID3
    35. Prescription of a phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor, for example sildenafil, to a patient who is also receiving a nitrate or nicorandila,c3
    36. Co-prescription of lithium with thiazide diuretic3
    37. Prescription of a potassium salt or potassium-sparing diuretic (excluding aldosterone antagonists) to a patient who is also receiving an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor antagonista3
    38. Prescription of verapamil to a patient who is also receiving a beta-blocker3
    39. Co-prescription of itraconazole with simvastatin, or with atorvastatin at a dose ≥80mga,c3
    40. Co-prescription of trimethoprim with methotrexate for >7 daysa3
    41. Prescription of clarithromycin or erythromycin to a patient who is also receiving simvastatin, with no evidence that the patient has been advised to stop the simvastatin while taking the antibiotica3
    42. Prescription of a penicillin-containing preparation to a patient with a history of allergy to penicillin4
    I: Laboratory test monitoring
    43. Patients aged >75 years on loop diuretics who have not had a U+E in the previous 15 monthsa3
    44. Prescription of amiodarone without a record of liver function being measured in the previous 9 months3
    45. Prescription of amiodarone without a record of thyroid function being measured within the previous 9 months3
    46. Prescription of an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor antagonist without a record of renal function and electrolytes being measured prior to starting therapy3
    47. Patients on an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor antagonist who have not had a U+E in the previous 15 monthsa3
    48. Prescription of warfarin to a patient without a record of INR having been measured within the previous 12 weeks (excluding patients who self-monitor)4
    49. Prescription of a statin without an ALT taken prior to starting treatment3
    50. Prescription of a statin without an ALT taken prior to starting treatment and within 3 months of starting treatment3
    51. Prescription of lithium without a record of a lithium level being measured within the previous 6 monthsa3
    52. Metformin without yearly serum creatinine3
    53. Use of a hypothyroid agent without monitoring relevant thyroid function tests within 2–4 months of initiation or dosage change and at least every 15 months thereafter3
    54. Prescription of methotrexate without a record of a full blood count within the previous 3 months3
    55. Prescription of methotrexate without a record of liver function having been measured within the previous 3 months3
    56. Allopurinol without baseline urea, electrolytes, creatinine and eGFR2
    • ↵a For 23 items (19 high risk and 4 extreme risk) 80% or more of the responders rated the indicator as high or extreme risk.

    • ↵b Consensus reached for assessing the safety of prescribing of practices, but not individual GPs.

    • ↵c Consensus reached for assessing the safety of prescribing of individual GPs, but not practices. ACE inhibitor = angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. ALT = alanine transferase. CKD = chronic kidney disease. eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate. INR = International Normalised Ratio. NSAID = non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. U+E = urea and electrolytes.

    • View popup
    Appendix 1.

    Literature review search strategy

    Setting
    “Family physician” OR “primary care” OR “family practice” OR “general practice” OR “ambulatory care” OR “ambulatory health” OR “ambulatory health-care” OR “ambulatory healthcare” OR “community health” OR “community healthcare” OR “community health-care” OR “primary health” OR “primary healthcare” OR “primary physician” OR “primary health-care” OR generalist OR “family medicine”
    Safety synonyms
    “administration error” OR “administration errors” OR “dispensing error” OR “dispensing errors” OR “medication error” OR “medication errors” OR “medical mistake” OR “medical mistakes” OR “prescription error” OR “prescription errors” OR “prescribing error” OR “prescribing errors” OR “ prescribing fault” OR “prescribing faults” OR “medical error” OR “medical errors” OR malpractice OR safety OR “safety-culture” OR “adverse event” OR “adverse events” OR “adverse effect” OR “adverse effects” OR “adverse reaction” OR “adverse reactions” OR harm OR harms
    Types of tools
    “scale” OR “scales” OR “survey” OR “surveys” OR “questionnaire” OR “questionnaires” OR “instrument” OR “instruments” OR “indicator” OR “indicators” OR “outcome assessment” OR “outcome assessments” OR “patient reported outcome” OR “patient reported outcomes” OR “patient experience” OR “patient experiences” OR “practice guideline” OR “practice guidelines” OR “quality assurance” OR tool OR tools OR toolkit OR toolkits
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 64 (621)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 64, Issue 621
April 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identification of an updated set of prescribing-safety indicators for GPs
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Identification of an updated set of prescribing-safety indicators for GPs
Rachel Spencer, Brian Bell, Anthony J Avery, Gill Gookey, Stephen M Campbell
British Journal of General Practice 2014; 64 (621): e181-e190. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X677806

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Identification of an updated set of prescribing-safety indicators for GPs
Rachel Spencer, Brian Bell, Anthony J Avery, Gill Gookey, Stephen M Campbell
British Journal of General Practice 2014; 64 (621): e181-e190. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X677806
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHOD
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • ambulatory care
  • consensus
  • general practice
  • medication errors
  • patient safety
  • primary health care
  • quality indicators

More in this TOC Section

  • Introducing genetic testing with case finding for familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care: qualitative study of patient and health professional experience
  • Impact of COVID-19 on primary care contacts with children and young people in England: longitudinal trends study 2015–2020
  • Non-speculum clinician-taken samples for human papillomavirus testing: a cross-sectional study in older women
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242