Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Advertisement
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Out of Hours

What’s the opposite of efficiency?

Tim Senior
British Journal of General Practice 2014; 64 (622): 253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X679868
Tim Senior
Tharawal Aboriginal Corporation, Airds.
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Figure1

Arguing against efficiency is like arguing against motherhood and apple pie. How could anyone be against efficiency in health services? And when you look at the amounts of money needed to run a health system, as politicians frequently do, of course you want to use that money efficiently. In just about every policy or statement on health systems efficiency will be mentioned as one of the principles. The drive to privatise is argued on the basis that private companies are more efficient; because we all know that in public services we are sat surrounded by money wondering what we should do with all that excess left over after buying all the health system we can, perhaps some antique furniture for the surgery, or artworks for every patient?

Am I allowed to have a problem with efficiency? At least let me give it a go. The easiest ways of measuring efficiency is to measure number of patients seen each hour, or the number of patients seen by each staff member. On these measures, any services dedicated to those who need them most — the poor, the disabled, people from outside the dominant cultures — look very inefficient. Longer consultations, more staff seeing each patient, oh dear, that doesn’t look very efficient at all. Of course everybody knows that the increased complexity warrants this. We might even hope to demonstrate better outcomes. Usually, though, they take a long time to come through, and waiting for that isn’t very efficient either. I mean, while we’re waiting, couldn’t we just work a little — you know — faster? Efficiency in the absence of unlimited funding is like gravity. You can jump, you can climb a tree, you can even fly in an aeroplane, but pretty soon you’ll come back down. In the same way, we’ll make arguments about effectiveness, about equity, and they’ll be heard for a bit. And then people look again at the budget. And look again at the number of people you’re seeing compared to the others. The need to be efficient will always pull us back to earth eventually even if we have feathers.

In arguing against the endless pursuit of efficiency, it sounds like I’m arguing for inefficiency. I’m not. I am arguing for effectiveness. But we don’t have a word that expresses the opposite of efficiency that isn’t inefficiency. As soon as efficiency comes up, the only options we have are efficient or inefficient, and none of us want to be inefficient. Perhaps we need a new word: ‘equifficient’. This expresses the illusion of efficiency sacrificed actually to do the job properly. It’s the extra bit of time in this consultation that saves another consultation for my colleague 2 days from now. It’s that slightly more tailored explanation that sends someone home happier in taking medications. I hope to use equifficiency as a word in my defence. ‘I am choosing to be equifficient’ I shall say proudly. Equifficiency will be my parachute that keeps me in the air a little longer before I land on the earth with a gentle, but effective, bump.

Footnotes

  • Tim recently won the first Gavin Mooney Memorial Essay competition for an essay on climate change and equity. Details of the competition are here: http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2014/02/18/the-inaugural-gavin-mooney-memorial-essay-competition-winner-announced/; and the essay itself is published here: http://inside.org.au/climate-change-and-equity-whose-language-is-it-anyway/

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2014
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 64 (622)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 64, Issue 622
May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What’s the opposite of efficiency?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
What’s the opposite of efficiency?
Tim Senior
British Journal of General Practice 2014; 64 (622): 253. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X679868

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
What’s the opposite of efficiency?
Tim Senior
British Journal of General Practice 2014; 64 (622): 253. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X679868
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

Out of Hours

  • Nature works: why don’t we? How living systems can inform the design of effective primary care
  • Bad Medicine: Medical student numbers
  • Books: His Bloody Project. Documents Relating to the Case of Roderick Macrae
Show more Out of Hours

Tim Senior

  • Population health
  • Don’t talk in class
  • Home and away
Show more Tim Senior

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242