Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editorials

Chronic disease prevention in primary care: how and when will genomics impact?

Fiona M Walter, Jon Emery and Hilary Burton
British Journal of General Practice 2014; 64 (624): 331-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X680401
Fiona M Walter
The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, & General Practice and Primary Care Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Roles: GP & Clinician Scientist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jon Emery
General Practice and Primary Care Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Australia, and The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Roles: Herman Professor of Primary Care Cancer Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hilary Burton
Cambridge, UK.
Roles: Director PHG Foundation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Over the past few years there has been considerable investment in genomics (DNA-based) research, including the Prime Minister’s announcement of £100 million to sequence 100 000 whole genomes.1 Despite so much hype about the anticipated impact of genomics on our understanding of susceptibility to cancer and other chronic diseases, new interventions have only recently begun to emerge.2 When and how are these advances likely to impact on primary care’s key role in preventing and treating common chronic diseases?

CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION IN PRIMARY CARE

Chronic disease prevention in primary care aims to identify individuals at increased risk who can then be given tailored disease prevention advice including lifestyle modification, disease screening, or preventive treatment. Current approaches to chronic disease risk assessment use a combination of factors including demographics, family history, lifestyle, physiological measurements, and biomarkers. GPs in the UK are familiar with using electronic risk calculators to provide a personal risk score, such as the QRISK2 algorithm for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.3 The family medical history currently makes an important contribution to risk assessment for many diseases as the risk of a number of cancers, type 2 diabetes, and ischaemic heart disease are all increased in the presence of a family history; this risk increases with more affected relatives.4 Family history can be viewed as a proxy for genetic predisposition as well as environmental and lifestyle factors, and remains the most clinically relevant genetic risk tool for GPs.

RECENT GENOMICS ADVANCES

While epidemiological studies have elucidated the most important risk factors for disease over the past half century, this work largely considered the population as homogeneous, with risk factors acting uniformly across the population in relation to diseases identified. Recent genomic advances have provided new insights such as that the diseases themselves are heterogeneous.5 There is also increasing evidence that an individual’s basic genetic background interacts with environmental exposures and modulates responses to preventive interventions. Such knowledge has started to address important areas such as why some smokers do not get various forms of cancer,6 and why some people may be particularly prone to alcohol addiction.7

GENOMICS AND CHRONIC DISEASE RISK

In the light of these advances, DNA-based risk assessment is increasingly being proposed as a means of determining chronic disease risk. Recent work undertaken by the European Commission funded multicentre Collaborative Oncological Gene-environment Study (COGS) on genetic variation and breast cancer risk has provided proof of principle that testing for genetic variants could be used to stratify the population so that those at higher risk might receive earlier or more frequent breast screening, while those at lower risk might even be recommended to forgo screening.8 Stratification of the programme in this way could mean that the potential harms of mammography (such as unnecessary biopsies) could be minimised while still detecting most women with breast cancer. Similar work is under way on cardiovascular disease, whereby genetic testing might augment current risk scores, enabling people at risk to be identified earlier before they develop phenotypic markers of risk, or with more precision, thus avoiding administration of statins to those who are unlikely to benefit. Proponents suggest that individuals who are low risk would then not be inconvenienced, treated, or even potentially harmed by preventive interventions such as statins that provide minimal benefit, and that resources could be used more efficiently.

PERSONALISED DISEASE PREVENTION IN PRIMARY CARE

Given adequate resourcing, a range of DNA-based tests could be used to fine-tune the current approach to prevention, and provide more tailored chronic disease prevention in primary care. This may be further enabled with near-patient testing for a particular set of genetic variants, undertaken in the surgery. Applied in this way, genomics could then support tailored cancer screening, the integration of genomics data with family history, sociodemographic, behavioural, and environmental risk factors into risk assessment tools, and even pharmacogenetically-informed prescribing such as for nicotine replacement treatment. However, there are still a number of issues that remain important to address before the incorporation of any of these approaches into routine general practice.

PRIMARY CARE PREPARATION FOR GENOMICS

What preparation might GPs need? The answer, in our mind, is not very much, as most of the genomics-based approaches will be delivered using GPs’ current expertise in communicating with patients about disease prevention, lifestyle and behaviour change. A detailed understanding of genetic variants and their additional contribution to risk profiling may not be required, assuming the validity of the risk assessment. We will need to incorporate discussions about the impact of DNA testing, including that a person’s level of risk could be determined at an earlier age and before phenotypic markers of risk or disease are detectable by biomarkers. The importance of adopting appropriate lifestyle changes will still need to be stressed. Where prevention options include interventions such as screening or drug treatment we will need to help patients understand that such interventions are not universally beneficial; those whose genetic background puts them at lower risk may need to understand the potential for harm in these activities. DNA-based risk assessment also raises ethical issues for primary care, particularly with near-patient testing, such as whether the genetic samples and test results will be stored for future reference or discarded. If stored, consent and access issues will become important, particularly around employment, insurance, and research by academic or commercial organisations.

IMPACT OF GENOMICS ON CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION IN PRIMARY CARE

As genomics-based approaches begin to be implemented both within health services and, increasingly, through direct-to-consumer testing, there is still much research to be undertaken. In a recent issue Middlemass and colleagues reported a qualitative study investigating the introduction of genetic testing for cardiovascular disease in primary care.9 While they found that the testing was acceptable, they also highlighted that: ‘... in some participants the genetic test results would reinforce healthy behaviour while others were falsely reassured.’

They emphasised that it will be important to build on the patient’s motivation to undertake genetic testing both for themselves and their families; to understand how patients deal with conflicting findings between genetic and conventional cardiovascular risk assessment; to learn how to promote responses that reinforce healthy behaviour change and reduce false reassurance; and to look at the potential benefit of genetic testing for younger people who may have more to gain from risk reducing behaviour.

Educational strategies will also be of value to primary care clinicians. The NHS National Genetics and Genomics Education Centre has developed an e-learning programme for the RCGP entitled ‘Genetics in Primary Care’.10 The website also features other relevant learning and teaching opportunities around genomics in health care. This will be an integral part of the overall strategic programme for genomics-related education and training interventions for the NHS workforce, which is being led by the newly created Genomics Advisory Board under Health Education England. We believe that it will be important to grasp current opportunities to expand professional education in genetics beyond the current remit, which is largely focused on rare heritable disease. Primary care will soon need to integrate genomics into its consideration of chronic disease prevention and start to prepare for what is likely to be less than a decade away.

Acknowledgments

Fiona M Walter is supported by a NIHR Clinician Scientist award. Hilary Burton is supported by the PHG Foundation, the working name of the Foundation for Genomics and Population Health, a charitable company registered in England and Wales: Charity 118664, Company 5823194. The COGS program was funded by the seventh Framework Programme of the European Commission under grant agreement 223175 (HEALTH-F2-2009-223175). The authors would like to acknowledge Susmita Chowdhury for her work on genetics education and stratified prevention.

Notes

Provenance

Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2014

This is an OpenAccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    DNA tests to revolutionise fight against cancer and help 100 000 NHS patients [press releases]. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/dna-tests-to-revolutionise-fight-against-cancer-and-help-100000-nhs-patients (accessed 6 Jun 2014).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Walter FM,
    2. Emery JD
    (2012) Genetic advances in medicine: has the promise been fulfilled in general practice? Br J Gen Pract doi:10.3399/bjgp12X629955.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Collins GS,
    2. Altman DG
    (2012) Predicting the 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in the United Kingdom: independent and external validation of an updated version of QRISK2. BMJ 344:e4181.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Guttmacher AE,
    2. Collins FS,
    3. Carmona RH
    (2004) The family history — more important than ever. N Engl J Med 351(22):2333–2336.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Curtis C,
    2. Shah SP,
    3. Chin S-F,
    4. et al.
    (2012) The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 486:346–352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sanderson S,
    2. Salanti G,
    3. Higgins J
    (2007) Joint effects of the N-acetyltransferase 1 and 2 (NAT1 and NAT2) genes and smoking on bladder carcinogenesis: a literature-based systematic HuGE review and evidence synthesis. Am J Epid 166(7):741–751.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Meyers JL,
    2. Dick DM
    (2010) Genetic and environmental factors for adolescent-onset substance use disorders. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 19(3):465–477.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Burton H,
    2. Chowdhury S,
    3. Dent T,
    4. et al.
    (2013) Public health implications from COGS and potential for risk stratification and screening. Nature Genetics 45(4):349–351.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Middlemass JB,
    2. Yazdani MF,
    3. Kai J,
    4. et al.
    (2014) Introducing genetic testing for cardiovascular disease in primary care: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract doi:10.3399/bjgp14X679714.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. NHS National Genetics and Genomics Education Centre
    Genetics in primary care, http://www.geneticseducation.nhs.uk/for-practitioners-62/genetics-primary-care (accessed 16 Jun 2014).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 64 (624)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 64, Issue 624
July 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Chronic disease prevention in primary care: how and when will genomics impact?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Chronic disease prevention in primary care: how and when will genomics impact?
Fiona M Walter, Jon Emery, Hilary Burton
British Journal of General Practice 2014; 64 (624): 331-332. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X680401

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Chronic disease prevention in primary care: how and when will genomics impact?
Fiona M Walter, Jon Emery, Hilary Burton
British Journal of General Practice 2014; 64 (624): 331-332. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X680401
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION IN PRIMARY CARE
    • RECENT GENOMICS ADVANCES
    • GENOMICS AND CHRONIC DISEASE RISK
    • PERSONALISED DISEASE PREVENTION IN PRIMARY CARE
    • PRIMARY CARE PREPARATION FOR GENOMICS
    • IMPACT OF GENOMICS ON CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION IN PRIMARY CARE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Socioeconomic deprivation and post-stroke care in the community
  • Advocating for patients through laboratory tests: what do GPs’ use of blood tests for suspected cancer tell us?
  • Diagnosis of prostate cancer in primary care: navigating updated clinical guidance
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242