Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editorials

The National Diabetes Prevention Programme: a pathway for prevention and wellbeing

Harpreet S Sood, Mahiben Maruthappu and Jonathan Valabhji
British Journal of General Practice 2015; 65 (636): 336-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15X685537
Harpreet S Sood
Chair and Chief Executive’s Office, NHS England, London.
Roles: Senior Fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mahiben Maruthappu
Chair and Chief Executive’s Office, NHS England, London.
Roles: Senior Fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Valabhji
National Clinical Director for Obesity and Diabetes, NHS England, London.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

INTRODUCTION

There are currently around 2.5 million people in England with diagnosed type 2 diabetes, and a further estimated 500 000 as yet undiagnosed.1 Type 2 diabetes constitutes over 90% of all those with diabetes in England and the prevalence continues to rise at an alarming rate. Diabetes is the commonest cause of lower limb amputation, and a major contributor to incident blindness, end-stage renal failure, heart attack, stroke, and premature mortality in England. As well as the human cost, the annual NHS costs of treating diabetes are estimated to be £10 billion, around 10% of the NHS budget, 80% of which is spent on treating the microvascular and cardiovascular complications.2

EVIDENCE

It is now well established that type 2 diabetes can be prevented or delayed in high-risk adults. At least five major randomised controlled trials, conducted in China,3 Finland,4 US,5 Japan,6 and India7 have documented 30–60% reductions in type 2 diabetes incidence in adults with impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance through intensive lifestyle change programme interventions. The US-based Diabetes Prevention Programme (DPP), the largest of the five studies, showed that people with impaired glucose tolerance who lost 5–7% of their body weight and achieved 150 minutes of moderate physical activity per week through a structured lifestyle change programme reduced their chance of getting type 2 diabetes by 58% over an average 2.8 years of follow-up.5

At least three of these major randomised controlled trials have conducted further follow-up of participants long after the intervention ended.3–5 Intensive lifestyle intervention delayed onset of type 2 diabetes by about 4 years. Not only is the cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes still significantly lower at up to 23 years follow-up, but also one of the studies has recently demonstrated lower incidence of severe diabetic retinopathy8 and lower cardiovascular and all-cause mortality9 in those that had been part of the original lifestyle intervention group, compared to those that had been part of the control group.

The NHS’ Five Year Forward View10 has suggested different approaches needed to ensure the future sustainability of our NHS; acknowledging that increasing demand for health care, increasing cost, and increasing public expectations must be accommodated within a financially-challenged environment. One such approach is a greater focus on disease prevention, with a commitment to implementing at scale a type 2 diabetes prevention programme.

NATIONAL DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAMME

The National Diabetes Prevention Programme (NDPP) was launched in England on Thursday 12 March 2015 as a collaborative programme between NHS England, Public Health England, and Diabetes UK. Seven initial demonstrator sites have been selected across England to implement the first phase of the programme and represent a portfolio of diverse geographic and population characteristics. These are Birmingham South and Central Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG), Bradford City CCG, Durham County Council, Herefordshire CCG and Local Authority (LA), Medway CCG and LA, Salford CCG and LA, and Southwark Council and CCG. The population covered by these sites includes almost 1.8 million people with obesity prevalence ranging from 8.2–13.6% and the proportion of South Asian origin, in whom incidence of type 2 diabetes is around five times that of white European populations, ranging from 1.0–60.9%. These demonstrator sites will test the real-world applications of the approaches described in the randomised controlled trials. A national roll-out is planned from April 2016 with a goal to have 10 000 high risk individuals from demonstrator sites enrolled onto the programme within the next year. A robust evaluation will be incorporated into the design of the programme, to assess the real-world effectiveness.

With an ambitious goal and a significant investment, the NDPP also provides the NHS with an opportunity to look beyond diabetes and pave the way for a broad prevention agenda. In Finland, the national diabetes programme11 subsequently evolved into a more integrated preventative approach. In 2012, the OneLife project brought together health promotion campaigns of the Finnish Brain Association, the Finnish Diabetes Association, and the Finnish Heart Association into a single programme. The key aim of this programme was to improve prevention, increase early diagnosis, reduce complications, and support rehabilitation in a range of diseases.

NHS PREVENTION AND WELLBEING

The NHS can use this moment to encourage individuals and communities to attend more conscientiously to their health through better nutrition, increased physical activity, and promoting general wellbeing. While promoting weight loss and encouraging physical activity will prevent type 2 diabetes, it has the clear potential in the longer term to contribute to reducing prevalence of heart disease, stroke, liver disease, and some of the common cancers. Furthermore, the NHS contribution to the prevention agenda can compliment the wider system approaches involving local and national government in their public health roles. Local authorities can work with CCGs to create environments that promote good health and change population behaviour through nudges and marketing campaigns for their local health economies. A proactive primary care system is central to achieving this, as is the more systematic use of evidence-based intervention strategies.

In 2004 it was highlighted that unless the UK took prevention seriously we would be faced with a sharply rising burden of avoidable illness.12 As the advice was not heeded, the NHS is now on the hook for the consequences. The NDPP should enable us to explore a comprehensive range of preventative interventions. If the nation fails to get serious about the prevention agenda, then recent progress in healthy life expectancies will stall, health inequalities will widen, and our ability to fund beneficial new treatments will be crowded-out by the need to spend billions of pounds on wholly avoidable illness.

Notes

Provenance

Freely submitted; not externally peer reviewed.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2015

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Diabetes UK
    Diabetes: facts and stats, https://www.diabetes.org.uk/Documents/About%20Us/Statistics/Diabetes-key-stats-guidelines-April2014.pdf (accessed 2 Jun 2015).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hex N,
    2. Bartlett C,
    3. Wright D,
    4. et al.
    (2012) Estimating the current and future costs of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs. Diabetic Med 29:855–862.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Pan XR,
    2. Li GW,
    3. Hu YH,
    4. et al.
    (1997) Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDMM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 20:537–544.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Tuomilehto J,
    2. Lindström J,
    3. Eriksson JG,
    4. et al.
    (2001) Prevention of Type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 344(18):1343–1350.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Knowler WC,
    2. Barrett-Connor E,
    3. Fowler SE,
    4. et al.
    (2002) Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 346(6):393–403.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sakane N,
    2. Sato J,
    3. Tsushita K
    (2011) Prevention of type 2 diabetes in a primary healthcare setting: three-year results of lifestyle intervention in Japanese subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. BMC Public Health 11(1):40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ramachandran A,
    2. Snehalatha C,
    3. Mary S,
    4. et al.
    (2006) The Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1). Diabetolgia 49(2):289–297.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gong Q,
    2. Gregg EW,
    3. Wang J,
    4. et al.
    (2011) Long-term effects of a randomised trial of a 6-year lifestyle intervention in impaired glucose tolerance on diabetes-related microvascular complications: the China Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Outcome Study. Diabetologia 54(2):300–307.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Li G,
    2. Zhang P,
    3. Wang J,
    4. et al.
    (2014) Cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and diabetes incidence after lifestyle intervention for people with impaired glucose tolerance in the Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study: a 23-year follow-up study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2(6):474–480.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. NHS England, Care Quality Commission, Health Education England, Monitor, Public Health England, Trust Development Authority
    (2014) Five year forward view, http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf (accessed 2 Jun 2015).
  11. 11.↵
    1. Lindström J,
    2. Louheranta A,
    3. Mannelin M,
    4. et al.,
    5. The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study (DPS)
    (2003) Lifestyle intervention and 3-year results on diet and physical activity. Diabetes Care 26(12):3230–3236.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Wanless D
    (2004) Securing good health for the whole population, UK Government http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/D/3/Wanless04_summary.pdf (accessed 2 Jun 2015).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 65 (636)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 65, Issue 636
July 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The National Diabetes Prevention Programme: a pathway for prevention and wellbeing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The National Diabetes Prevention Programme: a pathway for prevention and wellbeing
Harpreet S Sood, Mahiben Maruthappu, Jonathan Valabhji
British Journal of General Practice 2015; 65 (636): 336-337. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp15X685537

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The National Diabetes Prevention Programme: a pathway for prevention and wellbeing
Harpreet S Sood, Mahiben Maruthappu, Jonathan Valabhji
British Journal of General Practice 2015; 65 (636): 336-337. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp15X685537
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • INTRODUCTION
    • EVIDENCE
    • NATIONAL DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAMME
    • NHS PREVENTION AND WELLBEING
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Inclusion health and missingness in health care: dig where you stand
  • Concussion in sport: are new guidelines a game changer for primary care?
  • E-cigarettes in young people: applying the precautionary principle in primary care
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

Tweets by @BJGPjournal

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242