Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Editor’s choice

Tim Lancaster
British Journal of General Practice 2015; 65 (636): 340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15X685561
Tim Lancaster
Oxford and Director of Clinical Studies, Oxford Medical School. E-mail:
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tim.lancaster@medsci.ox.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

There is no evidence that time spent in general practice as a UK medical student correlates with recruitment to the GP workforce. In fact, the study by Harding et al shows that the correlation is in the opposite direction.1 As Harding et al point out, there was a substantial increase in the proportion of medical school training spent in general practice between 1980 and 2002. Although they document a more recent decline, the current proportions of medical school curricula allocated to general practice are 4–5 times greater than they were in 1980. The UK Medical Careers Research Group reported that proportions of UK graduates entering general practice from cohorts qualifying in the 1970s and early 80s had ranged between 40–45%: among 1983 graduates the proportion working in general practice was 42.7% 10 years after qualification.2 The current dire recruitment figures show that the proportion choosing general practice is less than half what it was in the 1970s and 80s, when there was effectively no general practice in the curriculum.

It would be absurd to suggest that greater exposure to general practice in medical school caused the decline in proportion of graduates choosing the specialty, but it is no more absurd than claiming that further increasing the proportion of undergraduate curriculum time in general practice will help attract 50% of graduates into general practice. Only significant changes to the rewards and opportunities in primary care can do that.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2015

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Harding A,
    2. Rosenthal J,
    3. Al-Seaidy M,
    4. et al.
    (2015) Provision of medical student teaching in UK general practices: a cross sectional study. Br J Gen Pract doi:10.3399/bjgp15X685321.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lambert TW,
    2. Evans J,
    3. Goldacre MJ
    (2002) Recruitment of UK trained doctors into general practice: findings from national cohort studies. Br J Gen Pract 52(478):364–372.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 65 (636)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 65, Issue 636
July 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Editor’s choice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Editor’s choice
Tim Lancaster
British Journal of General Practice 2015; 65 (636): 340. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp15X685561

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Editor’s choice
Tim Lancaster
British Journal of General Practice 2015; 65 (636): 340. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp15X685561
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Multimorbidity: a problem in the body, or a problem of the system?
  • Ten things I wish I had known about academic primary care
  • The role of the GP in maximising school attendance
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

Tweets by @BJGPjournal

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242