Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Out of Hours

Law note: giving evidence in court

Adam Sandell
British Journal of General Practice 2015; 65 (640): 599-600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15X687565
Adam Sandell
Cumbria, and Barrister, Matrix Chambers, London.
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

For most doctors, courts are unfamiliar territory. They’re inhabited by lawyers with strange ways of working, and judges who can derail careers. GPs get involved in a range of hearings from time to time, including inquests into patients’ deaths, clinical negligence cases, patients’ criminal cases, and employment tribunals. Here’s what I tell doctors who have to go to court.

Find out why you are required

First, find out what the case is about, and why you’re being asked to give evidence. Are you being criticised? At many inquests, there’s no suggestion that anyone’s done anything wrong; at others, the coroner or deceased person’s family may have tough questions for you.

Speak to your defence organisation

This is always a good idea and, if there’s any possibility that you’ll be criticised, you really must give them a ring. Discuss whether you need legal representation. The GMC publishes helpful guidance called Acting as a witness in legal proceedings.1 Read it.

Get support from friends and colleagues

These are often stressful situations. If something’s gone wrong, most of us beat ourselves up about it, whether or not we’re to blame. But you need to be firing on all cylinders when you stand up in court. We all make mistakes. If it’s an inquest and your conduct may be called into question, you’re meant to tell the NHS Performers’ List people within 7 days2,3 — not a well-known requirement.

Research and preparation

Do your homework. Study the relevant medical records. Discuss the case with colleagues whom you trust to tell you uncomfortable things kindly. Make sure your medical knowledge is up to date in relation to anything that may come up.

Get hold of all the relevant records. You’ll normally be expected to disclose them — to have provided copies — whether you want to or not. If, in the witness box, you start referring to documents that haven’t previously been disclosed, you’ll almost certainly have to cough them up, and you may ruffle feathers.

Remember that your duty to the court overrides duties you may owe or feel towards anyone else, including patients and colleagues. You need to be ‘honest, trustworthy, objective, and impartial’.1 The moment it looks like you’re trying to help someone out, including your patient, your evidence becomes much less impressive. Best to be forthcoming about anything relevant, even if it’s inconvenient.

Be prepared

Block out enough time from work. Don’t let running late add to the stress. Give yourself time to gather your thoughts. Consider taking a friend or colleague. Wear a suit — it’s expected. Find out, beforehand, where the court is, what time to arrive, where to go in the court building, whom to meet, and where you can get lunch. When you arrive, make sure your lawyer (if you have one) or the court usher (if you don’t) knows who and where you are.

Expect any timings to be as much use as a politician’s manifesto. If you’re meant to be there for 10 am, don’t be surprised if you start giving evidence the next day. If you’re told your bit will take 10 minutes, it may take 2 days. At some courts you may spend long hours in cramped, unventilated waiting rooms, sitting awkwardly close to patients and their families, so take a good book. Hearings are often adjourned, for all sorts of reasons: you might be told, after several hours of waiting, that you’re going to have to come back in 2 months’ time. Last-minute settlements or agreements that mean the hearing is no longer required are common (though not in inquests). It’s a rare clinical negligence case that gets all the way to a trial. Find out if you can observe the court’s proceedings while you wait; you’ll get a feel for how it works. But check: sometimes you shouldn’t be in court until you give your evidence.

Giving evidence

When you go into the witness box, take a deep breath and relax. You’ll first be asked to do the ‘truth, whole truth, nothing but the truth’ thing. Decide beforehand whether to swear on a religious book (tell the usher beforehand if it’s something other than the Bible) or affirm (the secular version).

What to call the judge? In Crown and County Court matters it’s usually ‘your honour’. In the High Court, ‘my lord’ or ‘my lady’. In most other courts you’re likely to see, including coroners’ courts for inquests, it’ll be ‘sir’ or ‘madam’. If in doubt, ask someone. Don’t worry if you get this courtroom silliness wrong — people do all the time.

Inquests are investigations, and are different from most court hearings. The coroner (inquest judge) will ask you questions first — probably taking you through your statement, if you were asked to provide one. Then you’ll be asked questions by the ‘interested persons’ or, if they have them, their lawyers. If bereaved family members (the commonest ‘interested persons’) are there, they may ask questions. It’s usually easier if the family is legally represented: unrepresented grieving relatives understandably often ask strange or confusing questions. Needless to say, answer all questions as honestly, carefully, and sensitively as you can. If you have a lawyer, he or she will be the last person to ask you questions.

Non-inquest hearings are almost always adversarial: a fight about who wins and who loses. The lawyer who wanted you there will normally ask you questions first. This is called examination-in-chief: the questions will be open and non-leading, and are designed to get your evidence out. Then the lawyer for the other side will cross-examine you, using leading questions designed to test or undermine your evidence. Your lawyer may then re-examine you, but only on things that have come up during cross-examination. The judge may butt in at some point, but many will leave the questioning to the lawyers.

Pace yourself

Listen carefully. Think before answering. Speak clearly and slowly. The judge will probably be taking notes; if you have a long answer, watch the judge’s pen for your cue as to when to start the next sentence. If there’s a jury, be especially careful that everyone can hear you.

Avoid jargon. Explain any medical terms you can’t avoid. Draw on your expertise where appropriate, though don’t be pompous or arrogant. This always looks dreadful. But if, like many GPs, you’re a self-effacing sort, do stick up for yourself when you should. You may be the only person around who can. Don’t stray outside your expertise. And don’t try to be a lawyer.

Don’t let anyone make you say something you don’t think is right; you’re unlikely to be able to go back into the witness box later. Be charming to everyone, including the other side’s lawyer. The attitude to strike is respectful, modest expertise. Sympathy, concern, and humility are never wrong.

Doctors are usually treated with great respect by judges and court lawyers. But not always: the wind will shift the moment you start being slippery.

If you get flustered, breathe, have a drink of water, and collect yourself. If you need a break, ask the judge: you’ll almost certainly get one and no one will mind. But you won’t be allowed to discuss your evidence with anyone, including your own lawyer, while you are in the middle of giving it.

Finally

Afterwards, expect to feel deflated. Things never go quite as you expect. You won’t have said exactly what you intended and you may have had a bit of a mauling. There may be no one around for a debrief, and some lawyers aren’t good at the human stuff that you and I do for a living. You’ll probably feel exhausted: don’t expect to be much use for the rest of the day. But you’ve done it: well done.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2015

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. General Medical Council
    Acting as a witness in legal proceedings. http://www.gmc-uk.org/static/documents/content/Acting_as_a_witness_in_legal_proceedings.pdf (accessed 23 Sep 2015).
  2. 2.↵
    National Health Service (Performers Lists) (England) Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/335) (as amended), regulation 9(2)(h) and (j).
  3. 3.↵
    National Health Service (Performers Lists) (Wales) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/1020) (as amended), regulation 9(1)(i).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 65 (640)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 65, Issue 640
November 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Law note: giving evidence in court
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Law note: giving evidence in court
Adam Sandell
British Journal of General Practice 2015; 65 (640): 599-600. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp15X687565

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Law note: giving evidence in court
Adam Sandell
British Journal of General Practice 2015; 65 (640): 599-600. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp15X687565
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Find out why you are required
    • Speak to your defence organisation
    • Get support from friends and colleagues
    • Research and preparation
    • Be prepared
    • Giving evidence
    • Pace yourself
    • Finally
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Books: His Bloody Project. Documents Relating to the Case of Roderick Macrae
  • Yonder: Physician assistants, timewasting, nursing homes, and social media
  • The chronotherapy of hypertension: or the benefit of taking blood pressure tablets at bedtime
Show more Out of Hours

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242