Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editorials

Sepsis: the primary care focus

Claire Gilham
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (644): 120-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X683905
Claire Gilham
Advanced Nurse Practitioner, Sett Valley Medical Centre, Derbyshire.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Sepsis, septicaemia, or blood poisoning is the body’s response to an infection. It is estimated to kill more people than breast, bowel, and prostate cancer put together.1,2 The Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE) found in 2011 sepsis to be the commonest direct cause of maternal death in the UK.3 Not only is it the mortality associated with sepsis but the long-lasting effect on its survivors that has significant social and economic impact.2

Early recognition, and thus intervention has been accepted as being key to preventing deaths from sepsis.4 This has been acknowledged in secondary care and over the past 10 years, sepsis care bundles5 (a selected set of interventions that when delivered as a group are more effective than the individual components in treating sepsis), have been introduced alongside early warning scores (EWS). Sepsis has now even become a political topic with the health secretary, Jeremy Hunt, announcing in the press at the beginning of 2015, that the government wanted to tackle sepsis and make it as important to the NHS as Clostridium difficile and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.1 Plans from which included ‘... an audit of practice in every GP surgery in England by March 2015 and a new tool for GPs to diagnose sepsis’1 in children <5 years old. This is in part a response to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman’s report into the death of a 3-year-old boy in 2010, Sam Morrish.6 This document highlighted the failure of both primary and secondary care to recognise this child’s deterioration and the seriousness of his condition.

SECONDARY CARE INVESTMENT

Sam became unwell in the community and the families first point of contact was the GP practice, not secondary care, yet this is where the focus of action has lay. Secondary care bundles and care pathways have been developed and implemented with supporting teams of healthcare professionals such as intensivists, critical care outreach teams, and even sepsis nurses. This has been assisted by electronic monitoring of vital signs which alert staff when patients’ vital signs trigger on the EWS, providing these teams with early detection of patients in a deteriorating state in order to facilitate early intervention and prevent significant harm or even death.

With such huge investment in secondary care into this devastating condition the focus is now shifting to primary care. Community healthcare does not have many of the luxuries afforded to the hospital setting, which is more controlled with patient contact being over the course of hours and days rather than just minutes. GP and advanced nurse practitioner appointment times are 10 minutes on average in which time a thorough assessment must be carried out, not only of history but, essentially, of vital signs (not mere ‘observations’).

Vital signs are just that: vital. In a fit and healthy individual, blood pressure and pulse will often remain stable as the cardiovascular system is able to compensate.7 Often the first vital sign that begins to change and allow this essential ‘early detection’ is the respiratory rate.7,8,9 A complete set of vital signs, including ascertaining urine output is key to establishing how the patient is currently and how to best manage the condition.

Again, The Ombudsman findings in Sam Morrish’s case highlighted this. It concluded that the decision making process should be founded upon evidence, documentation, and the implementation of National Guidelines.

LOOKING FORWARD

The subject of sepsis has now been included in annual ‘Hot topic’ updates for GPs, thus increasing its awareness. Nationally the profile of sepsis is being raised both publicly and politically and being championed in the UK by the Sepsis Trust.10 In 2015 the first annual Sepsis Trust conference in Nottingham was both well supported and received. Attending healthcare professionals came from such diverse backgrounds as surgeons, medics, nurses, paramedics, GPs, and politicians. Internationally, recognition of the importance of condition is being focused annually through World Sepsis day, 13 September.

Nationally the Sepsis Trust has supported the development and implementation of the Sepsis Six in hospital but has also produced a simple tool for use in primary care.9 It is a clear, quick, and easy to use checklist for practitioners in assessing patients at risk and expediting referral to secondary care as appropriate using a common language. This also ensures patients have a nationally consistent approach to their care.

The National Patient Safety Agency published a patient safety alert in September 2014 for ambulance trusts and GPs to develop a ‘robust action plan’ ... ’to achieve compliance’ by no later than 31 October 2014.11 The three steps identified were: first, to ensure staff have access to accurate and up-to-date sepsis screening tools for both adults and children and increased awareness of the condition. Second, all key staff to be made aware of this patient alert (from the National Patient Safety Alert). Third, sharing of good practice and developing further local initiatives relating to sepsis based on the deterioration page Patient Safety First Website.12

Implementation of The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) ensures parity of care across all trusts and CCGs using a standardised tool. All six parameters are those vital signs readily measurable in the primary care setting.8 The vital signs are:

  • respiratory rate;

  • heart rate;

  • temperature;

  • systolic blood pressure;

  • conscious level; and

  • oxygen saturations.

Most electronic software packages in use in primary care have a vital signs template, which acts a useful aide memoire to complete. These will also take the data inputted across all other templates, which can also help support QOF (Quality Outcomes Framework).

A full set of vital signs also allows community practitioners to compare patients current functioning against a baseline, helping to identify trends such as deterioration, albeit across a longer time frame than secondary care. This is especially important when monitoring a patient in primary care if they do not meet the referral criteria.

Many software programmes such as EMIS Web show trending reports of vital signs. This can pick up early exacerbations but also season variations helping clinicians and individual patients identify trigger points, and adjusting management plans accordingly.

In the future we could see this software developing to reflect the NEWS score as a quick ‘press of the button’ feature to save manually referring to the algorithm.

CONCLUSION

The focus on sepsis is growing and primary care has a key part to play. Assessment and the prompt referral of patients on to definitive care where appropriate, is key in order to save lives.

This can be best achieved using familiar assessment skills including testing for a complete set of vital signs, and supported by simple national tools aimed at primary care such as those from the Sepsis Trust.

Notes

Provenance

Commissioned, not externally peer reviewed.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2016

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. GOV.UK
    New action to reduce sepsis, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-action-to-reduce-sepsis (accessed 1 Feb 2016).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Daniels R
    (2009) The incidence, mortality and economic burden of sepsis. NHS Evidence emergency and urgent care, NHS Library Central Alerting System.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Cantwell R,
    2. Clutton-Brock T,
    3. Cooper G,
    4. et al.
    (2011) Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 118(Suppl 1):1–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    Sepsis: the recognition, diagnosis and management of severe sepsis, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/gid-cgwave0686/documents/sepsis-the-recognition-diagnosis-and-management-of-severe-sepsis-final-scope2 (accessed 1 Feb 2016).
  5. 5.↵
    1. Society of Critical Care Medicine
    Bundles, Surviving Sepsis Campaign. http://www.survivingsepsis.org/bundles/Pages/default.aspx (accessed 8 Feb 2016).
  6. 6.↵
    1. Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
    An avoidable death of a three-year-old child from sepsis A report by the Health Service Ombudsman for England on an investigation into a complaint from Mr and Mrs Morrish about The Cricketfield Surgery, NHS Direct, Devon Doctors Ltd, South Devon Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and NHS Devon Plymouth and Torbay Cluster, http://www.ombudsman.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/25896/An-avoidable-death-of-a-three-year-old.pdf (accessed 1 Feb 2016).
  7. 7.↵
    1. Resuscitation Council UK
    The ABCDE approach Underlying principles, https://www.resus.org.uk/resuscitation-guidelines/abcde-approach/ (accessed 8 Feb 2016).
  8. 8.↵
    1. Royal College of Physicians. National Early Warning Score (NEWS)
    (2012) Standardising the assessment of acute illness severity in the NHS, https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/national-early-warning-score-news (accessed 1 Feb 2016).
  9. 9.↵
    1. Preston R,
    2. Flynn D
    (2010) Observations in acute care: evidence-based approach to patient safety. Br J Nurs 19(7):442–447.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. The UK Sepsis Trust
    General Practice Sepsis Screening and Action Tool, http://sepsistrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/1409322477GPScreening2014Final.pdf (accessed 8 Feb 2016).
  11. 11.↵
    1. National Patient Safety Agency
    (September 2, 2014) Stage two: Resources. Resources to support the prompt recognition of sepsis and the rapid initiation of treatment, http://www.nhsla.com/CurrentActivity/Documents/Patient%20Safety%20Alert%20-%20Sepsis.pdf (accessed 8 Feb 2016).
  12. 12.↵
    1. Patient Safety First
    The ‘How to Guide’ for reducing harm from deterioration. http://www.institute.nhs.uk/images//documents/SaferCare/Deterioration-1.1_17Sept08.pdf (accessed 8 Feb 2016).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 66 (644)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 66, Issue 644
March 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sepsis: the primary care focus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Sepsis: the primary care focus
Claire Gilham
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (644): 120-121. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X683905

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Sepsis: the primary care focus
Claire Gilham
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (644): 120-121. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X683905
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • SECONDARY CARE INVESTMENT
    • LOOKING FORWARD
    • CONCLUSION
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Stroke: time to address cognition
  • Was enough, and is enough, being done to protect the primary care workforce from COVID-19?
  • Primary care networks: are they fit for the future?
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242