Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editorials

Zika virus infection during pregnancy: what, where, and why?

Rachael M Burke, Pranav Pandya, Eleni Nastouli and Philip Gothard
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (644): 122-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X683917
Rachael M Burke
Core Medical Trainee, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pranav Pandya
University College London Hospitals, London.
Roles: Director and Clinical Lead of Fetal Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eleni Nastouli
Clinical Lead in Virology, University College London Hospitals, London.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip Gothard
Consultant Physician, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

On 1 February 2016 the World Health Organization declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern following reports of large clusters of microcephaly and Guillain-Barré Syndrome associated with an increase in cases of Zika virus (ZIKV) infection in French Polynesia (2014) and Brazil (2015– 2016).1 The Committee emphasised that there was ‘... no public health justification for restrictions on travel or trade’ and the main interventions were to control mosquito populations and prevent bites in pregnant women. Why has this happened and how might it affect patients attending primary care in the UK?

ZIKV was first isolated from a Rhesus monkey in Uganda in 1947.2 The following year it was identified in Aedes mosquitoes, which differ from malaria-transmitting Anopheles mosquitoes by biting during the day. ZIKV has been found throughout Africa and South East Asia where infection is asymptomatic or produces a mild febrile illness and rash which goes undiagnosed. The first outbreak was not recorded until 2007 when three-quarters of the population of Yap Island in Micronesia became infected.3

The current epidemic of ZIKV infection began in early 2015 in northeastern Brazil. Since then ZIKV transmission has been confirmed in 35 countries.4 One theory is that ZIKV was carried to Brazil by infected Pacific Islanders visiting an international canoeing event in Rio de Janeiro in August 2014. In September 2015 clinicians working in Pernambuco state noticed an increase in newborn babies with microcephaly. The Ministry of Health quickly established a register and within 3 months recorded 4180 suspected cases, including 68 deaths, compared to a total of 147 reports in the whole of 2014.5 A review of the first 35 cases noted that 74% of mothers reported a rash during pregnancy and 71% of infants had severe microcephaly.6 ZIKV RNA was detected in the amniotic fluid of two mothers and from the brain of a baby who died shortly after birth.7 Taken together these data indicate a strong association between ZIKV infection during pregnancy and microcephaly, although a causal relationship is yet to be proven.

ZIKV infection has an incubation period of 3–12 days. Patients may present with a fever, rash, arthralgia, and conjunctivitis. The illness is self-limiting and lasts for up to a week. Severe cases are uncommon. It can be difficult to distinguish ZIKV infection from other viral illnesses such as dengue and chikungunya, which are also transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes. Population seroprevalence studies from the outbreak in Micronesia showed that 80% of ZIKV infections were asymptomatic,8 which presents a diagnostic problem in pregnancy if ZIKV crosses the placenta.

PRACTICAL ADVICE

Public Health England (PHE) and the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology released joint interim guidelines on 29 January 20169 followed by PHE and the Royal College of General Practitioners with primary care guidelines on 4 February 2016.10 They recommend that pregnant women who present with symptoms consistent with ZIKV infection within 2 weeks of travel to an area of active transmission (Figure 1) should be tested for ZIKV.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention map of the geographic distribution of Zika virus as of 3 February 2016. Source: http://www.cdc.gov/zika/images/zik-world-map_active_02-03-2016_web.jpg.

There is a wide differential diagnosis of illnesses in returning travellers, including malaria, and patients with symptoms should be discussed with a physician experienced in their assessment. EDTA plasma and urine samples from symptomatic patients should be sent to the Rare and Imported Pathogens Laboratory at Porton Down (Box 1). Testing involves reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of blood and urine. Antibody testing is not yet available in the UK and is currently less reliable due to potential cross-reaction with similar viruses, such as dengue and yellow fever. This may change soon and for now PHE recommend that all patients suspected of ZIKV infection, and any pregnant women exposed to ZIKV, should have a serum sample collected and saved. While these interim guidelines are welcome, it is important to be aware that there are limited data available to make conclusive recommendations. Pre-test counselling is important, particularly as the full characteristics of the tests are unknown and false-negative results are possible.

Box 1.

Further information

Clinical assessment of returning travellers with symptoms

  • Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Mortimer Market Centre, Capper Street, London WC1E 6JB

    Walk-in clinic Monday to Friday 9 am to 4 pm. On-call tropical registrar (24 hours) via UCLH switchboard 020 3456 7890; http://www.thehtd.org

Pre-travel telephone advice to health professionals

  • National Travel Health Network and Centre (NaTHNaC): 0845 602 6712

    http://www.uclh.nhs.uk/ourservices/servicea-z/htd/nathnac/pages/home.aspx

Practical guidelines for managing Zika virus exposure in pregnancy

  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists

    https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/news/interim-clinical-guidelines-on-zika-virus-infection-and-pregnancy/

  • Royal College of General Practitioners

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/497767/Zika_virus_guidance_for_primary_care_February_2016_FINAL.pdf

How to send samples for Zika virus testing

  • Rare and Imported Pathogens Laboratory

    https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/rare-and-imported-pathogens-laboratory-ripl

The risk of Zika virus and other infections in pregnancy

  • Public Health England

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/zika-virus

General information

  • European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

    http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/healthtopics/zika_virus_infection/Pages/index.aspx

  • US Center for Disease Control and Prevention

    http://www.cdc.gov/zika/

All pregnant women who have potentially been exposed to ZIKV should be referred to their local maternity unit for 4-weekly fetal ultrasound scan (USS) examinations. This includes asymptomatic patients, those who have had symptoms outside the testing window and patients who have tested negative for ZIKV by RT-PCR. Microcephaly is a head circumference below the 2.5th centile for gestational age and standard fetal USS is a sensitive screening test for this and other intracranial abnormalities such as ventriculomegaly and calcification.

Pregnant women with a positive ZIKV RT-PCR or with concerning findings on USS should be referred to a fetal medicine service for evaluation and follow up. This may involve a detailed USS and possibly amniocentesis from 15 weeks to test for ZIKV and other causes of neonatal infection in the amniotic fluid. Fetal brain MRI may detect abnormalities not seen on USS. It is important to remember that microcephaly and other intracranial anomalies may be caused by a number of disorders unrelated to ZIKV. PHE has clear guidelines for evaluating pregnant women with a rash, in particular, advice on when to test for rubella, varicella, or parvovirus B19.11

Pregnant women should consider avoiding travel to areas with ongoing ZIKV outbreaks and seek advice from a travel health specialist. The first trimester probably carries the greatest risk of microcephaly. If travel is unavoidable they should be advised to take great care to protect against daytime mosquito bites by covering up and using insect repellents.

There is emerging evidence of ZIKV transmission through sexual intercourse.12 It is not known how long ZIKV persists in semen and UK and US guidance differs, however this is unlikely to be a common route of transmission. For simplicity our advice is to follow the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance to abstain from sex or use condoms for the duration of the pregnancy if a male partner has been in a Zika virus area.9

ZIKV poses significant challenges in the counselling process in pregnancy as limited evidence exists to about the proportion of infected patients who are asymptomatic and have brief, low level viraemia, the risk to the fetus relative to the time of infection, the reliability and significance of laboratory tests, and the likelihood of the child developing neurological sequalae. These questions are the subject of ongoing research, but in the meantime, 1.4 million UK travellers visit countries with ongoing ZIKV transmission each year and of these we estimate that around 280 000 are women of child-bearing age. If only a small number of these are pregnant that represents several thousand women who may consider themselves at risk. Fortunately the limited data suggest that the risks to the baby are very low. However pregnancy is often an anxious time and GPs can help expectant mothers by being aware of the latest guidelines and where to seek help.

Notes

Provenance

Freely submitted; not externally peer reviewed.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2016

This is an OpenAccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    WHO Director-General summarizes the outcome of the Emergency Committee regarding clusters of microcephaly and Guillain-Barré syndrome. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2016/emergency-committee-zika-microcephaly/en/ (accessed 4 Feb 2016).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Dick GWA,
    2. Kitchen SF,
    3. Haddow AJ
    (1952) Zika virus. I. Isolations and serological specificity. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 46(5):509–520.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Duffy MR,
    2. Chen T-H,
    3. Hancock WT,
    4. et al.
    (2009) Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N Engl J Med 360(24):2536–2543.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
    Countries with local Zika transmission, http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/healthtopics/zika_virus_infection/zika-outbreak/Pages/Zika-countries-with-transmission.aspx (accessed 4 Feb 2016).
  5. 5.↵
    1. Brazilian Ministry of Health
    Informe Epidemiológico No 10— semana epidemiológica (SE) 03/2016 (17 A 23/01/2016), [In Portuguese]. http://portalsaude.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2016/janeiro/28/COES-Microcefalias---Informe-Epidemiol--gico-10---SE-03-2016---26jan2016---20h34.pdf (accessed 4 Feb 2016).
  6. 6.↵
    1. Schuler-Faccini L,
    2. Ribeiro EM,
    3. Feitosa IM,
    4. et al.
    (2016) Possible association between Zika virus infection and microcephaly — Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 65(3):59–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
    (January 21, 2016) Zika virus epidemic in the Americas: potential association with microcephaly and Guillain-Barré syndrome (first update), http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/rapid-risk-assessment-zika-virus-first-update-jan-2016.pdf (accessed 4 Feb 2016).
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ioos S,
    2. Mallet HP,
    3. Leparc Goffart I,
    4. et al.
    (2014) Current Zika virus epidemiology and recent epidemics. Med Mal Infect 44(7):302–307.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
    Interim RCOG/RCM/PHE/HPS clinical guidelines Zika virus infection and pregnancy — 29 January 2016, https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/news/interim-clinical-guidelines-on-zika-virus-infection-and-pregnancy/ (accessed 4 Feb 2016).
  10. 10.↵
    1. RCGP Public Health England British Medical Association
    Zika virus infection guidance of primary care, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/497767/Zika_virus_guidance_for_primary_care_February_2016_FINAL.pdf (accessed 5 Feb 2016).
  11. 11.↵
    1. HPA
    Guidance on viral rash in pregnancy, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/322688/Viral_rash_in_pregnancy_guidance.pdf (accessed 4 Feb 2016).
  12. 12.↵
    1. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention Press Release
    CDC adds 2 destinations to interim travel guidance related to Zika virus, http://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2016/s0203-zika-travel-guidance.html (accessed 4 Feb 2016).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 66 (644)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 66, Issue 644
March 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Zika virus infection during pregnancy: what, where, and why?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Zika virus infection during pregnancy: what, where, and why?
Rachael M Burke, Pranav Pandya, Eleni Nastouli, Philip Gothard
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (644): 122-123. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X683917

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Zika virus infection during pregnancy: what, where, and why?
Rachael M Burke, Pranav Pandya, Eleni Nastouli, Philip Gothard
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (644): 122-123. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X683917
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • PRACTICAL ADVICE
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Stroke: time to address cognition
  • Was enough, and is enough, being done to protect the primary care workforce from COVID-19?
  • Primary care networks: are they fit for the future?
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242