Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Substance misuse: institutionalised neglect in general practice

Roy Robertson
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (644): 125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X684241
Roy Robertson
Muirhouse Medical Group and Professor of Addiction Medicine, University of Edinburgh. E-mail:
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: roy.robertson@ed.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The suite of articles in the recent edition of the BJGP is well received and reminds us of the changing landscape of drug misuse.1 Implicit in the descriptions and suggestions is the expectation that we, as medical generalists, should be aware of these medical problems and be in a position to offer help, guidance, and referral when necessary.

It should not need to be said that the majority of the problems that present to the NHS are related to opiates, particularly injecting opiates, and that the rising number of deaths are from overdose of opiates.

The other changing landscape is driven by the 2012 Health and Social Care Act in England and Wales, and by parallel changes in Scotland. These changes are unravelling the carefully constructed shared care between primary and secondary care by commissioning third-sector agencies at the expense of statutory NHS provision and, in a contracting economy, spending a larger proportion of available budgets on non-medical interventions. The spectre of outbreaks of blood-borne viruses or bacterial infections should remind us of the dangers of trivialising drug taking in the medical sector.

At a critical turning point in funding and policy we should be careful to recognise the importance of primary care and that this role needs to be integrated into policy and funding arrangements. It seems extraordinary that drug treatment is not a core responsibility and that, as an Enhanced Service contractual arrangement, it can be included or excluded from our day-to-day work. General Medical Council guidance advises and reminds us of our responsibility to all patients to, ‘provide effective treatments based on the best available evidence’. National guidelines both from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and the Departments of Health point to the essential place that GPs have in managing drug users.

It is unacceptable that management of drug users and their problems, prescribing methadone, buprenorphine, or other appropriate medication, and cooperating closely with secondary care and the third sector should not be a core service requirement. Any other group of patients would have spotted and alerted us to this institutional neglect, which is hard to understand, but must be based on prejudice, maybe ignorance and fear, and sadly a systematic reorganisation, which apparently doesn’t care.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2016

REFERENCE

  1. 1.↵
    1. Jones R
    (2016) Matters of substance. Br J Gen Pract doi:10.3399/bjgp16X683017, http://bjgp.org/content/66/642/3.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 66 (644)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 66, Issue 644
March 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Substance misuse: institutionalised neglect in general practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Substance misuse: institutionalised neglect in general practice
Roy Robertson
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (644): 125. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X684241

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Substance misuse: institutionalised neglect in general practice
Roy Robertson
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (644): 125. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X684241
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCE
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying patients at risk of psychosis
  • It wasn’t always rosy …
  • Safety netting and follow-up (of babies’ eyes)
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242