Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editor’s Briefing

Hard Times

Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (645): 171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X684421
Roger Jones
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

One of the targets of Charles Dickens’ Hard Times is the 19th century equivalent of the bloodless, box-ticking bureaucracy that many people feel is now strangling the NHS. Mr Gradgrind demands facts, facts unadorned by sensitivities, emotions, or other human foibles. And facts we have — league tables, performance indicators, Care Quality Commission inspection scores, 2-week waiting time performance — facts coming out of our ears. Measuring the cost of everything and the value of practically nothing. Striking junior doctors march across the battlefield of British health care, weaving their way between closing GPs’ surgeries, the elderly, migrants, and refugees baffled by the complexity of the system, bankrupt hospital trusts, callous care homes, and a social fabric unable to support the loads placed upon it by the contraction of medical care. Love the NHS we might, but we are still struggling to provide health outcomes that match up to our European neighbours. Hard times indeed.

In a hard-hitting leading editorial, Dominic Patterson addresses the problems that doctors working under pressure are likely to encounter, writing that ‘In caring for patients in the environment of the NHS, doctors’ health is being damaged, and damaged doctors provide worse care for patients. For too long the needs of doctors with mental illness or addiction have been neglected.’ These problems have been repeatedly documented and, Patterson adds, there is no need for more evidence, no need for more discussion or debate. ‘It is time at last for a binding covenant of care to be drawn up between the NHS and its damaged doctors.’

There are now some reasons for optimism, as these problems have become more widely acknowledged and initiatives to put in place support for doctors in difficulty are being launched. None of this, of course, is a substitute for dealing with the root causes of our struggling health service, which include serious underinvestment and under-staffing, and pointless reorganisation.

There is plenty of clinical controversy in this issue of the BJGP. The database study by Armstrong and colleagues, examining the incidence of viral and bacterial meningitis in relation to previous antibiotic prescriptions, suggests that patients who have received one or more prescriptions in the preceding year are significantly more likely to develop meningitis, even when prescribing in the few weeks leading up to the index diagnosis is accounted for. Their initial hypothesis, that antibiotic prescribing may disturb the microbiome, allowing the proliferation of pathogenic organisms, remains to be confirmed, but this is an intriguing twist on the antibiotic overprescription story, and at the very least another warning to prescribe with caution.

Cautious prescribing is the theme of another editorial by Davis and Robson, on the dangers of NSAID prescription, and how to avoid them. NSAIDS, they say, cause more deaths than do road traffic accidents, and twice as many as asthma or cervical cancer. They should be avoided whenever possible and, if they appear to be unavoidable, naproxen with proton pump inhibitor cover is the ‘least worst’ option. They recommend the development of system-wide methods to identify older patients at high risk of bleeding and cardiovascular disease, and to involve all concerned in prescribing, patients included, in attempts to improve patient safety.

The study by Carey and colleagues focuses on another under-served group: people with intellectual disabilities. They have additional comorbidities and greater mortality rates, yet often encounter difficulties in accessing adequate care. The authors of this article make a strong plea for special arrangements to be put in place in practices to improve access for people with intellectual disability, and to provide longer appointments for them.

The recurrent theme in Out of Hours this month is the community relevance of general practice, in an effervescent description of a new primary care facility in an unpromising part of Glasgow, a new colocated GP federation in Tyne and Wear and, from Cardiff, a community hub with a distinctly caffeinated flavour. The winning Dangerous Idea in the Society for Academic Primary Care competition takes community participation several steps further, and proposes a model of patient-driven research, crowdfunded through a platform called Kickstarter. There are some good book reviews too.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2016
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 66 (645)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 66, Issue 645
April 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hard Times
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Hard Times
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (645): 171. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X684421

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Hard Times
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (645): 171. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X684421
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Shock Therapy — Disaster Remodelling in the NHS
  • The Global Primary Care Crisis
  • Listen to Your Patient
Show more Editor’s Briefing

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242