Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editor’s Briefing

Fundamental Flaws

Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (647): 283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X685309
Roger Jones
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

eLetter submission guidelines

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com. PLEASE NOTE: your email address will be published.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • The Calais “jungle
    Gerry Clare, Polly Nyiri, Chie Yamamoto and Emma Preston
    Published on: 25 August 2016
  • Published on: (25 August 2016)
    Page navigation anchor for The Calais “jungle
    The Calais “jungle
    • Gerry Clare, Consultant Ophthalmologist
    • Other Contributors:
      • Polly Nyiri
      • Chie Yamamoto
      • Emma Preston
    "The Calais “jungle” is a shocking indictment of governmental policy towards refugees in 2016. Medical assistance to the inhabitants of the unofficial refugee camp, many of whom are unaccompanied children, is at best scanty and uncoordinated.
     
    Most of the refugees live in deplorable conditions under tarpaulin sheets on the former dumping sites, which are also home to sizeable rat populations. Many sleep close to the ground and are forced to endure squalid toilet facilities. Some suffer with infectious diseases such as malaria and tuberculosis and are in need of urgent medical treatment. They are exposed to assault, ethnic and police violence, sexual exploitation, infectious disease and psychological illness.
     
    Non-governmental organisations, for example MSF, and local charities such as the Salam Association are on hand to provide a level of primary care, yet what is needed is an orchestrated medical campaign to include screening for infectious disease and even secondary care for certain cases. We contend that a joint Franco-British programme is needed urgently to augment public and environmental health measures in the refugee camps around Calais and to liaise with the NGOs already in operation there.
     
    The British and French Armed Forces benefit from unparalleled resources to provide medical aid in adverse situations - both contributed admirably to containing the rece...
    Show More
    "The Calais “jungle” is a shocking indictment of governmental policy towards refugees in 2016. Medical assistance to the inhabitants of the unofficial refugee camp, many of whom are unaccompanied children, is at best scanty and uncoordinated.
     
    Most of the refugees live in deplorable conditions under tarpaulin sheets on the former dumping sites, which are also home to sizeable rat populations. Many sleep close to the ground and are forced to endure squalid toilet facilities. Some suffer with infectious diseases such as malaria and tuberculosis and are in need of urgent medical treatment. They are exposed to assault, ethnic and police violence, sexual exploitation, infectious disease and psychological illness.
     
    Non-governmental organisations, for example MSF, and local charities such as the Salam Association are on hand to provide a level of primary care, yet what is needed is an orchestrated medical campaign to include screening for infectious disease and even secondary care for certain cases. We contend that a joint Franco-British programme is needed urgently to augment public and environmental health measures in the refugee camps around Calais and to liaise with the NGOs already in operation there.
     
    The British and French Armed Forces benefit from unparalleled resources to provide medical aid in adverse situations - both contributed admirably to containing the recent Ebola epidemic in West Africa - and have a history of collaboration. Could we invite their respective medical services, with their wealth of experience, staff and supplies, to become fully engaged in assessing and addressing the refugees’ health needs in the camps?
     
    In these days of extreme global inequality, a compassionate governmental response could powerfully counterpose the narrative of violence we appear to have grown accustomed to.”
    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 66 (647)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 66, Issue 647
June 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fundamental Flaws
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Fundamental Flaws
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (647): 283. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X685309

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Fundamental Flaws
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (647): 283. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X685309
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCE
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • John Diamond Did Not Battle Cancer Bravely
  • Complex Systems Harm People with Complex Needs
  • Seeing red with the NICE traffic lights
Show more Editor’s Briefing

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242