Research
Tumour stage and implementation of standardised cancer patient pathways: a comparative cohort study
Henry Jensen, Marie Louise Tørring, Morten Fenger-Grøn, Frede Olesen, Jens Overgaard and Peter Vedsted
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (647): e434-e443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X684805
Henry Jensen
Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Research Unit for General Practice and Section for General Medical Practice, Department of Public Health;
MHSc, PhDRoles: Postdoctoral researcher
Marie Louise Tørring
Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health; Department of Anthropology, School of Culture and Society;
MA, PhDRoles: Associate professor
Morten Fenger-Grøn
Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
MScRoles: Senior statistician
Frede Olesen
Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
MD, DrMedSciRoles: Professor
Jens Overgaard
Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
PhD, MDRoles: Professor
Peter Vedsted
Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
DMSc, MDRoles: Professor
In this issue
Tumour stage and implementation of standardised cancer patient pathways: a comparative cohort study
Henry Jensen, Marie Louise Tørring, Morten Fenger-Grøn, Frede Olesen, Jens Overgaard, Peter Vedsted
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (647): e434-e443. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X684805
Jump to section
- Top
- Article
- Abstract
- INTRODUCTION
- METHOD
- RESULTS
- DISCUSSION
- Acknowledgments
- Appendix 1. Tumour stages before, during, and after CPP implementation for all identified patients
- Appendix 2. Odds ratios and 95% CIs for patients with incident cancer, regardless of GP questionnaire response, of having local cancer during and after CPP implementation compared with before CPP implementation. Values <1 indicate less likelihood of having local cancer compared with before CPP implementation
- Appendix 3. Odds ratios and 95% CIs after multiple imputation for identified patients with incident cancer of having local cancer during and after CPP implementation compared with before CPP implementation. Values <1 indicate less likelihood of having local cancer compared with before CPP implementation
- Notes
- REFERENCES
- Figures & Data
- Info
- eLetters
More in this TOC Section
Related Articles
Cited By...
Intended for Healthcare Professionals