Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Advertisement
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Debate & Analysis

Evolving health policy for primary care in the Asia Pacific region

Chris van Weel, Ryuki Kassai, Gene WW Tsoi, Shinn-Jang Hwang, Kyunghee Cho, Samuel YS Wong, Chong Phui-Nah, Sunfang Jiang, Masako Ii and Felicity Goodyear-Smith
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (647): e451-e453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X685513
Chris van Weel
Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Honorary Professor of Primary Health Care Research, Department of Health Systems Research and Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Roles: Emeritus Professor of General Practice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryuki Kassai
Department of Community and Family Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Roles: Professor of Family Medicine/General Practice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gene WW Tsoi
Hong Kong College of Family Physicians, Hong Kong.
Roles: Family Physician and Past President and Council Member
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shinn-Jang Hwang
Taipei Veterans General Hospital; Professor of Family Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Roles: Vice Superintendent
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyunghee Cho
Department of Family Medicine, NHIMC Ilsan Hospital, Korea.
Roles: Professor of Family Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel YS Wong
Professor of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare, School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chong Phui-Nah
National Healthcare Group Polyclinics, Singapore.
Roles: Chief Executive Officer, Adjunct Associate Professor, Family Physician, Senior Consultant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sunfang Jiang
Department of General Practice, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai Medical School Fudan University, China.
Roles: Professor of General Practice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masako Ii
School of International and Public Policy, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan.
Roles: Professor of Health Economics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Felicity Goodyear-Smith
Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Roles: Professor of General Practice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Most countries experience major challenges to their health systems. The factors behind this global trend are increasing health costs and diminished returns on healthcare investment for ageing populations. Where the primary healthcare function is formally structured in the health system, and professionals are educated for their specific tasks, the performance of the system is improved: better primary health care leads to better population health at lower healthcare costs.1 This makes strengthening primary health care a global strategy to secure sustainable care.2 The value of international collaboration in implementing primary healthcare policy was exemplified by the I LIVE PC conference in 2011 in Washington.3 A critical feature of this is the modification and adaptation of general principles to the prevailing local conditions: primary health care must be built up from the community level where it has to operate.4 For this, a good understanding of the existing health system is important in initiating reforms. There is growing insight in primary health care in Europe and North America,3,5 but data are scarce for many countries or regions.4 To address this, the World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA) took the initiative to document how primary care is organised around the world, and created dialogues on how the values of primary care can be addressed within the constraints of different healthcare systems.6 A plenary symposium at the 2015 WONCA Asia Pacific regional conference in Taipei, Taiwan, offered an opportunity to compare the health systems of six member organisations of WONCA — China (Shanghai region), China (Hong Kong), Japan, Republic of Korea (South Korea), Singapore, and Taiwan — and document their experiences in the implementation of policy. The six presentations were structured on the format and method developed by the WONCA Working Party on Research.6 The discussions that followed focused on five aspects of policy implementation: the strengths and weakness of each system; priorities for change; the available capacity in the system to address and process major changes; setting-specific and joint Asia Pacific regional needs to support this process of change; and priorities in international collaboration to support change.

China — Shanghai

Healthcare reform in Shanghai is driven by a floating and increasingly ageing population.7 There is poor referral between primary, secondary, and tertiary care, resulting in disordered medical consultations. The current challenges include how to provide high-quality primary care. More than 200 community health centres have been set up; the priorities for change include improving the quality and quantity of primary healthcare providers and establishing effective two-way referral systems. A healthcare system oriented to primary care should be implemented by government reform.

China — Hong Kong

Although Hong Kong has some of the best public health outcomes in the world, there is poor integration between primary and secondary care, as well as between private and public care, resulting in duplication of resources and doctor-shopping. Within primary care, the current challenges include differing standards of care provision and fragmented primary care.8 The priorities for change include realigning the hospital-oriented healthcare system to a patient-focused healthcare system centred on primary care. This will require the government to put primary care at the centre of health system reform.

Japan

Despite having universal health insurance coverage since 1961, Japan is an example of a society that is underserved by an ill-defined primary care system with fragmentation and hospital centralism.9 Faced with a rapidly ageing population and growing social security expenditures, Japan needs major reforms to reduce waste and enhance cost-effectiveness. A national system to accredit training programmes, including for general practice, has finally been introduced. A nationwide database project with international collaboration has been initiated to prospectively show the content and quality of general practice, to be ensured by standardised professional development.

Republic of Korea

Healthcare coverage in South Korea consists of National Health Insurance and Medical Aid. There is a very weak gatekeeper system, and fee-for-service is the main payment method. The easy accessibility to any specialty and the low medical costs are major benefits for patients. Over-consumption and excessively high frequency of specialist consultation are major problems for the medical system.10 The government and the primary care group seek to strengthen primary care but this is opposed by the medical society governed by the specialist group.

Singapore

Ranked by Bloomberg as the most efficient healthcare system in the world in 2014, Singapore’s system has primary care as its foundation. However, not having a fixed primary care doctor and doctor-shopping have resulted in fragmented patient care. With an ageing population and an increased chronic disease burden,11 priorities for change include patient ‘empanelment’ to clinical practices and teams of healthcare professionals, new care delivery, and payment models that better support chronic disease management. The government’s continued support for greater collaboration between public and private primary care clinics12 is imperative to ensure sharing of limited resources.

Taiwan

Taiwan’s National Health Insurance has a high coverage rate, easy access, and high patient satisfaction, and it provides consistent healthcare quality. The current challenges include frequent ambulatory care visits and medical resources being wasted because of no strict referral system and only limited financial incentives for patients to choose primary care visits.13 The priorities for change include improving the quality of primary care and shifting from hospital-oriented health care to community primary care. Integrated primary care, including a family doctor programme (community medical group), has been initiated to solve these problems.

The presentations referred to many problems and uncertainties encountered when improving local health systems. This came forward in particular in the experiences in mainland China, where the recent decision to promote primary health care highlighted the need to build the family medicine workforce more or less from scratch. WONCA’s mission has for long been to help countries build primary care and family medicine leadership in their local context through the establishment of national colleges and academies of family physicians.14 It currently, has member organisations in 131 countries (http://www.globalfamilydoctor.com/).

Referred to at the same time was a next phase in primary care development. Their experiences were based on strong societal and economic development, with substantial improvements in population health and in general high levels of (technical) health care for populations covered by health insurance. From here, the challenges were not only in changing existing structures but also building where there had been nothing before.

An emphasis on provider-driven (instrumental) interventions led to poor integration between professionals. Where there was integration this was vertical,14 leading to stand-alone disease-centred care. This lack of integration led to duplicated care, over-use of facilities, and wasting of precious resources that threatened the sustainability of the health system. A common feature was the absence of a primary healthcare function in the system to coordinate and horizontally integrate the care provision towards the needs and priorities of individuals and communities. With no restrictions to practise in the community, every specialist can claim ‘primary health care’. This leads to variation in the quality of care and makes a primary healthcare function in the health system a priority. For primary health care to be able to lead, it is essential to introduce professional training in primary health care — including in family medicine — as the mandatory condition to practise in the community.

To move to primary health care, stakeholders near to policymakers, notably patients and community leaders, must work in a relation of trust with family physicians and other primary healthcare professionals.

Shanghai and Singapore’s community-based structure of health care is strong, and could be reinforced by introducing ‘panels’: individuals registered with a family practice to contract all their health care. Most countries could learn from how both Singapore and Hong Kong have built on their SARS experiences by creating facilities in polyclinics and community health centres to assess at-risk patients in isolation.

The workshop highlighted the need for better integration of care between different providers as well as with social services. Many countries share this need and this may emphasise the importance of horizontal integration based on a generalist primary care function.15 This is directly related to the second need the workshop highlighted. To deliver its potential the generalist primary care function has to be built on competent professionals. Strengthening the primary care workforce through education and training directed at the core values of primary care14 is again an issue for many countries. The workshop brought together in a pragmatic way experiences of only six WONCA member organisations and a more comprehensive review, including countries from other regions, may have presented other needs and priorities. This should therefore encourage a further international collaboration to review the implementation of primary healthcare policy. To secure access to high-quality health care for all, every health system will have to provide strong primary health care as its basis. Learning from others in implementing primary healthcare policy through international sharing of experiences — their challenges, failures, and successes — will continue to support this.

Notes

Provenance

Freely submitted; not externally peer reviewed.

Competing interests

The authors ha declared no competing interests.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2016

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Starfield B
    (1994) Is primary care essential? Lancet 344(8930):1129–1133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. World Health Organization
    (2008) The world health report 2008 — primary health care, now more than ever, http://www.who.int/whr/2008/en/ (accessed 22 Apr 2016).
  3. 3.↵
    (2012) J Am Board Fam Med, http://www.jabfm.org/content/25/Suppl_1.toc (accessed 22 Apr 2016). 25, Suppl 1.
  4. 4.↵
    1. van Weel C,
    2. Turnbull D,
    3. Whitehead E,
    4. et al.
    (2015) International collaboration in innovating health systems. Ann Fam Med 13(1):86–87, doi:10.1370/afm.1751.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kringos D
    (2012) The strength of primary care in Europe. Thesis, University of Utrecht, http://www.nivel.nl/sites/default/files/bestanden/Proefschrift-Dionne-Kringos-The-strength-of-primary-care.pdf (accessed 22 Apr 2016).
  6. 6.↵
    1. WONCA Research Working Party
    Plenary panel project resource documents. http://www.globalfamilydoctor.com/groups/WorkingParties/Research/plenarypanelprojectresourcedocuments.aspx (accessed 22 Apr 2016).
  7. 7.↵
    1. Yu Y,
    2. Sun X,
    3. Zhuang Y,
    4. et al.
    (2011) What should the government do regarding health policy-making to develop community health care in Shanghai? Int J Health Plann Manage 26(4):379–435.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Wong SY,
    2. Kung K,
    3. Griffiths SM,
    4. et al.
    (2010) Comparison of primary care experiences among adults in general outpatient clinics and private general practice clinics in Hong Kong. BMC Public Health 10:397.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Goodyear-Smith F,
    2. Kassai R
    (2015) International primary care snapshots: New Zealand and Japan. Br J Gen Pract doi:10.3399/bjgp15X684109.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Shin DW,
    2. Cho J,
    3. Yang HK,
    4. et al.
    (2014) Impact of continuity of care on mortality and health care costs: a nationwide cohort study in Korea. Ann Fam Med 12(6):534–541, doi:10.1370/afm.1685.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Tan CC
    (2002) National disease management plans for key chronic non-communicable diseases in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 31(4):415–418.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ministry of Health, Singapore
    Primary care survey 2010 report, https://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/home/Publications/Reports/2014/primary-care-survey-2010-report.html (accessed 22 Apr 2016).
  13. 13.↵
    1. Chen TJ,
    2. Chou LF,
    3. Hwang SJ
    (2006) Patterns of ambulatory care utilization in Taiwan. BMC Health Serv Res 6:54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kidd M
    (2013) The contribution of family medicine to improving health systems: a guidebook from the World Organization of Family Doctors (Radcliffe Publishing, London, New York), 2nd edn.
  15. 15.↵
    1. De Maeseneer J,
    2. van Weel C,
    3. Egilman D,
    4. et al.
    (2008) Funding for primary health care in developing countries. BMJ 336(7643):518–519.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 66 (647)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 66, Issue 647
June 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evolving health policy for primary care in the Asia Pacific region
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Evolving health policy for primary care in the Asia Pacific region
Chris van Weel, Ryuki Kassai, Gene WW Tsoi, Shinn-Jang Hwang, Kyunghee Cho, Samuel YS Wong, Chong Phui-Nah, Sunfang Jiang, Masako Ii, Felicity Goodyear-Smith
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (647): e451-e453. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X685513

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Evolving health policy for primary care in the Asia Pacific region
Chris van Weel, Ryuki Kassai, Gene WW Tsoi, Shinn-Jang Hwang, Kyunghee Cho, Samuel YS Wong, Chong Phui-Nah, Sunfang Jiang, Masako Ii, Felicity Goodyear-Smith
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (647): e451-e453. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X685513
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • China — Shanghai
    • China — Hong Kong
    • Japan
    • Republic of Korea
    • Singapore
    • Taiwan
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • SAFER diagnosis: a teaching system to help reduce diagnostic errors in primary care
  • An Australian reflects on the Collings report 70 years on
  • Emergencies in general practice: could checklists support teams in stressful situations?
Show more Debate & Analysis

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242