Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Out of Hours

Bad Medicine: The worried hell

Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (651): 526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X687361
Des Spence
Maryhill Health Centre, Glasgow.
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The ‘worried well’. I can’t quite remember when I heard this expression, nor who might have coined it. But it is common parlance in medicine and all GPs understand its meaning implicitly. I know that we shouldn’t use stereotypes, but where is the fun in that? The worried well are educated patients, perhaps with too much time on their hands, who repeatedly attend the surgery with reams of internet pages. Dr Google always diagnoses possible cancer or an appalling life-shortening degenerative condition, catastrophising all symptoms, irrespective of the probability. And the worried well reflect the general levels of high anxiety paralysing one in four of us a year. Is this the new norm, the consequence of wealth and free time, where ‘the worst case scenarios’ pervade thinking in all things? Anxiety is the biggest public health issue of our time.

It seems to start with parents. In pregnancy there is paranoia about foods, alcohol, medications, weight, scans, and a birth plan that always becomes the complete opposite. Then there are special care baby units, the breastfeeding police, weaning, allergies, the dangers of vaccination, delayed development, gluten, endless contradictory specialist advice, and a swathe of poisoning self-help books. Anxiety is heaped on anxiety. Then there’s choosing the best school, tutoring, exam stress, self-harm, gender issues, Photoshop celebs, gluten, peanuts, piano lessons, the Duke of Edinburgh Award, sexualisation, eating disorders, Facebook, sexting, cyber-bullying and just ever-escalating anxiety. There is no place today for the half-baked-just-about-adequate parenting of the past. Instead, it is parenting seen through a prism of potential illness and risk, a head-spinning cocktail of concern. Seemingly well-intentioned guidelines have become confining and limiting like never before. Our society, which is driven by wealth, individualism, and perfectionism, leaves many riven with introspection, indecision, and full of unrealistic and unobtainable expectations. Modern life seems little more than a gilded cage for many, with anxiety hardwired in utero. This is important to medicine because much of our work is spent dealing with anxiety. And what do we offer? Psychoactive medications, sedatives, and antidepressants. Or the latest faddish counselling intervention. These haven’t worked and won’t work.

Specifically, the worried well are anxious about their health, unwilling to accept reassurance, demanding investigation and referrals. They then suffer unnecessary intervention and overtreatment with real lasting harm. The recent explosion in medically unexplained symptoms simply reflects the rise and rise of health anxiety. Also, the health anxious vocally promote screening despite its severe limitations and dangers. For example, the current calls for dementia screening, which lacks specificity, will see overdiagnosis and the loss of wellbeing for many with health anxiety. Finally, the health anxious are high achieving and are entering medicine, projecting disproportionate anxieties and health beliefs onto patients, a perfect storm of health anxiety. All this clogs access and drives costs in the NHS.

Currently our healthcare system wrings it hands over the ‘unworried unwell’, who are seemingly impervious to all health promotion: defaulting clinics, non-compliant with medication, and spurning all screening. Yet the unworried unwell are free from anxiety and spared of much iatrogenic harm.

We cannot underestimate the burden of chronic mental health problems and the loss of wellbeing suffered by the worried well. We need to refocus our concern on the ‘worried well’ for they are sick and at risk. But there is no research, no task force, no tsar, no professors or academic departments seeking to find solutions. Doctors have a duty to the sick, but an even greater duty to protect the well, and we are currently failing in this duty. For life without being a bon-viveur ain’t no life at all.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2016
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 66 (651)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 66, Issue 651
October 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bad Medicine: The worried hell
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Bad Medicine: The worried hell
Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (651): 526. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X687361

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Bad Medicine: The worried hell
Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (651): 526. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X687361
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • The chronotherapy of hypertension: or the benefit of taking blood pressure tablets at bedtime
  • Every home should have one: the critical role of the research librarian
  • Fakery and science
Show more Out of Hours

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242