Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editor’s Briefing

Getting the Message Out

Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (653): 596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X687997
Roger Jones
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The impact factor of a journal is an indication of its stature and ‘reach’, and a measure of the citation of its original articles by other peer-reviewed publications. The BJGP’s impact factor is the second highest of all primary healthcare journals. Our total citations exceed that of the highest-ranked journal, but because we publish more original research, the impact factor of the Annals of Internal Medicine, published in the US, is higher than ours. The number of citations of our papers in other journals is, however, dwarfed by the numbers of visitors to our website, the majority of whom click through to read articles, and download them, in their hundreds of thousands. Submission numbers are steadily rising, and because we are unable to accept many of the high-quality articles that we receive, we have decided to launch BJGP Open, to provide more capacity in primary care publishing.

The impact factor tells you about a journal, but not about an individual article, so we also use alternative metrics: Altmetric, to measure attention given to articles published in the BJGP by other media, including social and news media. Above all, however, we are interested in clinical relevance and the strength and novelty of the ‘clinical message’ is a key criterion for acceptance. In this issue you will also find a report on the latest RCGP Research Paper of the Year awards. Three of the six category winners were papers published in the BJGP, and all have something important to say about clinical practice in primary care.

Two difficult and controversial topics are tackled in the editorials: the role of general practice in the palliative care of children with cancer, and the continuing uncertainties about the balance between the risks and benefits of HRT. The randomised controlled trial reported by Joe Kai and colleagues is a helpful reminder of the importance of nonsurgical management of heavy menstrual bleeding, and there is a useful article on the prevention of type 2 diabetes after the onset of gestational diabetes. Amanda Jane Elliott’s practice-based research on patients’ understandings of diabetes and its treatment contains some salutary home truths.

Two articles examine communication within the consultation, one on the difficulties of demonstrating empathy, and the other on the extent to which consultation length may affect patients’ experiences of communication with their doctor. Promoting early diagnosis of cancer has been something of a theme in the BJGP over the last 2 or 3 years and two studies address this topic, one providing additional information on the key diagnostic symptoms for non-metastatic colorectal cancer, and the other making a persuasive case for cervical cytology being used as a diagnostic method in young women presenting with symptoms suggestive of cervical cancer.

We also have an article acknowledging the contribution of our reviewers: the unsung (and unpaid) heroes of medical publishing, who guide our decisions about acceptance and rejection, and whose work often transforms an ugly duckling of a paper into a highly-cited swan. And please dip into Out of Hours, where you will find book reviews including an anthology of poetry and medicine containing contributions from writers as diverse as Coleridge and Emily Dickinson, EM Forster’s masterpiece Howards End, and a slightly controversial guide to dealing with difficult consultations.

Last month I emphasised the importance of medical schools providing high-quality GP attachments for undergraduate students, to help promote general practice as a career choice. Health Education England have now published a report by Professor Val Wass, supporting medical students towards careers in general practice, setting out actions that need to be taken to ensure that general practice has as high a profile as possible as a subject of study in undergraduate education and is an attractive career choice.1 The report’s 15 recommendations include a focus on students’ experiences before entering medical school, on the informal (hidden), as well as formal curriculum, and on tensions across the primary care–secondary care interface.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2016

REFERENCE

  1. 1.↵
    1. Health Education England
    By choice — not by chance Supporting medical students towards future careers in general practice, http://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/By%20choice%20not%20by%20chance%20web%20FINAL.pdf (accessed 10 Nov 2016).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 66 (653)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 66, Issue 653
December 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Getting the Message Out
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Getting the Message Out
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (653): 596. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X687997

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Getting the Message Out
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2016; 66 (653): 596. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X687997
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCE
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • John Diamond Did Not Battle Cancer Bravely
  • Complex Systems Harm People with Complex Needs
  • Seeing red with the NICE traffic lights
Show more Editor’s Briefing

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242