Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Response to a news article on the RCGP website

Faraz Razi
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (654): 12-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X688513
Faraz Razi
Basingstoke Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. E-mail:
Roles: GPST2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: farazr@doctors.org.uk
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

I have read with great interest both the news article published on the RCGP website, ‘Thousands of GP appointments “lost” due to children with conjunctivitis being turned away from nursery, says RCGP’,1 and the leaflet produced by the RCGP to educate childcare professionals, parents, and teachers about managing conjunctivitis in young children.2 General practice is under unprecedented workload pressure,3 and every attempt to rationalise appointments so that resources can be utilised appropriately ought to be commended.

The purpose of the aforementioned leaflet is to reassure parents et al that young children with conjunctivitis do not require assessment by a GP, nor exclusion from school. I wonder, however, that in emphasising this message, if the RCGP has oversimplified the advice regarding the use of antibiotics. The leaflet states that children ‘DON’T need to … use antibiotics’. A literal interpretation of this particular language by parents et al may lead to children with severe conjunctivitis not receiving treatment and risking serious complications. This advice is not in keeping with a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Clinical Knowledge Summary (CKS),4 which, having based its recommendations on a recent Cochrane Database Systematic Review,5 concludes that topical antibiotic treatment should be administered in severe cases.

The NICE CKS accepts that there is no agreed definition of severe conjunctivitis, and that it is reasonable to use clinical experience to determine the severity of a case. Perhaps a revised version of the leaflet, one that applies specialist ophthalmology input to highlight the difference between severe and non-severe conjunctivitis, would be more effective in triaging those children in need of antibiotics towards a GP, while simultaneously meeting the RCGP’s objective of rationalising appointments.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2017

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Royal College of General Practitioners
    (2016) Thousands of GP appointments ‘lost’ due to children with conjunctivitis being turned away from nursery, says RCGP. http://www.rcgp.org.uk/news/2016/november/thousands-of-gp-appointments-lost-due-to-children-with-conjunctivitis-being-turned-away-from-nursery.aspx (accessed 6 Dec 2016).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Royal College of General Practitioners
    (2016) LOOK OUT: if you think your child has infective conjunctivitis (sometimes known as ‘pink eye’). http://www.rcgp.org.uk/eyehealth (accessed 6 Dec 2016).
  3. 3.↵
    1. Iacobucci G
    (2016) Over half of English general practices report unmanageable workload. BMJ 352:i703.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    (2015) Conjunctivitis —infective. https://cks.nice.org.uk/conjunctivitis-infective#!scenariorecommendation:2 (accessed 6 Dec 2016).
  5. 5.↵
    1. Sheikh A,
    2. Hurwitz B,
    3. van Schayck CP,
    4. et al.
    (2012) Antibiotics versus placebo for acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (9):CD001211, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001211.pub3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 67 (654)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 67, Issue 654
January 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response to a news article on the RCGP website
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Response to a news article on the RCGP website
Faraz Razi
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (654): 12-13. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X688513

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Response to a news article on the RCGP website
Faraz Razi
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (654): 12-13. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X688513
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • It’s time to look again at GP funding
  • Inequalities in CKD management can be overcome
  • Changes in patient experience associated with growth and collaboration in general practice
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242