Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Out of Hours

Current trends in Japanese health care: establishing a system for board-certificated GPs

Makoto Kaneko and Masato Matsushima
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (654): 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X688669
Makoto Kaneko
Musashikoganei Clinic, Japanese Health and Welfare Co-operative Federation and Graduate Student, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Roles: Attending Physician
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masato Matsushima
Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Roles: Professor and Director
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

BACKGROUND

The Japanese healthcare system provides universal health coverage through both a fee-for-service system under governmental control and a free-access system.1 The free-access system allows private facilities to establish hospitals or clinics if they meet the requirements of the Medical Care Act, a Japanese law covering the healthcare system.1 Patients can seek treatment at whatever public or private medical facility they prefer, with no difference in cost.1 There is no strict gatekeeper system by primary care physicians1 so patients are not always required to have a regular primary care doctor.1

Under this system, Japan has maintained top-class global health indicators, including life expectancy at birth and infant mortality.1 However, the debt-to-gross domestic product (GDP) ratio of the government currently exceeds 200%, and is expected to continue rising.2 Japan’s debt-to-GDP ratio is the highest among the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries,3 and a large proportion of that debt comes from social security expenditures.2

As a result, the costs associated with social security need to be reduced.2 Healthcare expenditures increased by 3.1% in 2011, about one-third of which was attributed to the ageing population and about two-thirds to the costs of advanced medical care.2 As expenditures per capita on national health care have been increasing annually, this raises the question of whether Japanese people are receiving appropriate care.

The World Health Organization and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) in Japan point out that the lack of gatekeepers to advanced medical facilities is associated with an increased number of inpatients, a disproportionate burden on healthcare workers, and a reduction in efficiency and quality of care.1

They also add that the lack of primary care doctors leads to an insufficient supply in providing appropriate medical care.1 Considering these circumstances, the MHLW has indicated the importance of primary care physicians for dealing with the rapidly ageing population and reduce healthcare expenditures.4

THE NEW CATEGORY OF SPECIALIST

In Japan, physicians trained in an internal medicine-based residency programme have continued to play a principal role in the primary care setting.5 The Japan Primary Care Association (established in 2010) provides continuous professional development and has become the recognised certifying body for primary care physicians.6 It had 11 401 members as of 31 May 2014, including 10 227 physicians, 65 dentists, 627 pharmacists, 336 other health professionals, and 146 medical students.6 Moreover, as of 30 September 2015, there were 500 certified family physicians, 3386 certified instructors, 310 residency programmes, and 126 board-certified primary care pharmacists.6

From 2017, the system of an independent third-party organisation will be established and ‘board-certified GPs’ will become the new category of specialist.4 The GP board will include the following six competencies: Person-centered care — Comprehensive care, Integrated care; Interprofessional work; Community orientation; Professionalism; and System-based practice.7

LOOKING AHEAD

A final decision has yet to be reached on the formal English-language term for board-certified GPs. The Japanese board-certified GP consists of a combination of ‘hospitalist’ — a doctor primarily engaged in inpatient care at hospitals — and ‘family physician’ — a doctor specialising in outpatient care as a regular primary care doctor at a clinic.7 Thus, the concept of a board-certified GP in Japan is not necessarily synonymous with that of a GP in the UK. For example, hospitalists need to see many patients without advanced or serious disease due to the free-access system mentioned previously (that is, hospitalists are also doing the job of a family physician).

The MHLW promotes differentiation of function in outpatient care by increasing medical remuneration to those who play a role as a consistent primary care doctor to strengthen the primary care system. The MHLW also imposes the special charge for patients who visit hospitals containing over 500 beds or advanced treatment hospitals without a referral letter from a primary care physician.8

Whether the new system and board will lead to improvements in the Japanese healthcare system has become the subject of considerable discussion.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2017

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. World Health Organization and Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan
    Health service delivery profile: Japan 2012, http://www.wpro.who.int/health_services/service_delivery_profile_japan.pdf (accessed 30 Nov 2016).
  2. 2.↵
    1. The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Public Policy, Health Policy Unit
    (2015) Policy and practice for medicine, 2015, [In Japanese].
  3. 3.↵
    1. OECD
    List of OECD member countries — ratification of the convention on the OECD. http://www.oecd.org/about/membersandpartners/list-oecd-member-countries.htm (accessed 30 Nov 2016).
  4. 4.↵
    1. The Ministry of, Health Labour Welfare in Japan
    (2013) Report on the desirable situation of board-certified specialists, [In Japanese].
  5. 5.↵
    1. Yokobayashi K
    1. Kusaba T
    (2013) in Recommendations: common disease in Japan generalist teachers’ consortium, Comprehensiveness and education about common disease in relation to outpatient care in primary care clinics, ed Yokobayashi K (Kai-shorin, Tokyo) [In Japanese]. pp 104–111.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Japan Primary Care Association
    (2014) About the association, [In Japanese].
  7. 7.↵
    1. The Japanese Medical Specialty Board
    (2016) The maintenance standard of the specialty training programme for board-certified general practitioners, [In Japanese].
  8. 8.↵
    1. The Ministry of Health, Labour Welfare in Japan
    (2015) Regarding fees for treatment in major hospitals without referral letters, [In Japanese].
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 67 (654)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 67, Issue 654
January 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Current trends in Japanese health care: establishing a system for board-certificated GPs
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Current trends in Japanese health care: establishing a system for board-certificated GPs
Makoto Kaneko, Masato Matsushima
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (654): 29. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X688669

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Current trends in Japanese health care: establishing a system for board-certificated GPs
Makoto Kaneko, Masato Matsushima
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (654): 29. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X688669
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • BACKGROUND
    • THE NEW CATEGORY OF SPECIALIST
    • LOOKING AHEAD
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Every home should have one: the critical role of the research librarian
  • Fakery and science
  • Viewpoint: Redundant subjectivity?
Show more Out of Hours

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242