Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Our ailing profession: author’s response

David Zigmond
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (655): 62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X689041
David Zigmond
St James Church Surgery, London. E-mail:
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: info@jackireason.co.uk
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Valerie Iles’s response to my article ‘Our ailing profession: we need more than resilience and replenishment’1 shows that my major points are unclear, to at least one reader.

I certainly do not wish to attribute blame or victimhood, or encourage aggrieved despondency. My article, though, takes a very wide and long view and concludes that our professional healthcare problems now have the kind of nature and roots as to be cultural. Culture means that no one is to blame, yet we are all responsible.

Neither do I wish to carelessly stymie colleagues’ ‘ways of improving [their] working lives’ and relationships. However, it is important to be vigilant to the bigger picture. My article described a conference where dispirited and enervated young doctors were offered palliative suggestions of mindfulness, stress management, and enhanced breathing techniques. Yes, I accept that such devices may help us ‘get by’, but in no way address cardinally important bigger questions: how do we understand our rapidly increasing stress, distress, demoralisation, and burnout? If we can understand, what can we do about it?

The danger of merely propagating coping strategies is that they can serve to parry and obscure such questions about pathogenesis.

In the last two decades I have seen how the 4Cs — competition, commodification, commissioning, and computerisation — have incrementally depersonalised and demoralised our NHS. The Health and Social Care Act 2012 has exacerbated this. Dismissing such complex analysis as meretricious ‘blame’ will help none of our longer-term interests. Nor will Valerie Iles’s recommendation that my writing should not be published. What kind of culture does that lead to?

Yes, I have many positive suggestions. Some are summarised in ‘Plummeting morale of junior doctors: one branch of our blighted tree of welfare’, accessible via my home page.2

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2017

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Zigmond D
    (2016) Our ailing profession: we need more than resilience and replenishment. Br J Gen Pract 66(653):622–623, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X688213.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Zigmond D
    (2016) Plummeting morale of junior doctors: one branch of our blighted tree of welfare, Letter to the Chair of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. http://www.marco-learningsystems.com/pages/david-zigmond/new-1/n31.03.16%20sue%20bailey%20+%20cover%20page.pdf (accessed 12 Jan 2017).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 67 (655)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 67, Issue 655
February 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Our ailing profession: author’s response
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Our ailing profession: author’s response
David Zigmond
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (655): 62. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X689041

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Our ailing profession: author’s response
David Zigmond
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (655): 62. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X689041
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Socioeconomic differences in help seeking for colorectal cancer symptoms during COVID-19
  • Author response
  • Personal lists are not impractical. Look at Norway!
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242