Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Out of Hours

Primary care chaplaincy: a valid talking therapy?

Gordon Macdonald
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (655): 77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X689221
Gordon Macdonald
Regent Gardens Medical Centre, Kirkintilloch, Glasgow.
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The end of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) in Scotland from April 2017, I believe, heralds new opportunities for both clinician and patient alike. With the many benefits of QOF have come the negatives of the inverse care law,1 the prevention paradox,2 and target centredness. It is exciting to envisage new initiatives of person-centred care that can be organised around our patients as we form local practice clusters.

As a practice we have run one such service for several years — chaplaincy. This has been delivered, irrespective of faith or non-faith background, by our part-time chaplain, in line with Scottish Executive guidelines.3 Our service is a synthesis of Prof. Hanlon’s ‘modern maladies’ approach and Karis Medical Centre’s ‘deepest human needs’ approach.4 Prof. Hanlon has helpfully described modern maladies such as loss of wellbeing, obesity, addictive behaviours, and depression.5 We use these presentations as cues that there may be an unmet deeper inner need such as significance or security that leads to a chaplaincy referral. Addressing these issues unsurprisingly involves time, hospitality in the form of listening and compassion, practical advice, and spiritual direction in the search for meaning in the midst of loss.

HELPING WITH THE SYMPTOMS OF DEPRESSION AND LOSS OF WELLBEING

It is well described that patients are living longer with increasing numbers of long-term conditions. One definition of health6 encourages the concept of adapting and self-managing, which seems particularly relevant for patients with multimorbidity. Patients can be enabled to reach these health goals by receiving the holistic care described by Freeman, which was specifically inclusive of spirituality.7 Having practised medicine for over 20 years I recognise that, although some patients may state a reductionist worldview, there are few patients who do not function as dualist interactionists and accept the concept of body–mind fusion. We have therefore found that patients are typically open to being referred to the practice chaplain.

The advantages of such in-house referral are numerous: close working relationship, ease of referral, and flexibility to operate without a waiting list. This is in stark contrast with other NHS ‘talking therapies’. The government is keen to increase the availability and access to such talking therapies, and certainly primary care chaplaincy achieves this for our patients.

As with any service, evidence of effectiveness is important. In this case we chose to compare our chaplaincy service with antidepressants, which are seen by many patients as the solution to their symptoms of depression and loss of wellbeing.

We used the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS)8 (a well-validated scoring tool where a mean improvement of 7 or more is clinically significant) to assess pre- and post-intervention wellbeing scores. Initially, there were 80 patients with complete datasets on antidepressants and 86 with complete datasets in the chaplaincy group. However, when those co-prescribed antidepressants were removed from the chaplaincy group the number fell to 45. Data were expressed as based on 86 where the mean improvement in WEMWBS was 7.3. The treatment effect was maintained in the 45 pure chaplaincy group with the mean rise in WEMWBS being 7.53. The final WEMWBS score was 80 days in both groups.

Baseline characteristics including sex, ethnicity, and age showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The mean baseline WEMWBS score was lower in the antidepressant group. We also found that patients with lower baseline scores had larger improvements in WEMWBS.

A REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE TO MEDICATION

The mean improvement in WEMWBS in the chaplaincy intervention group was 7.53 (95% CI = 4.86 to 10.21, P<0.0001), and in the antidepressant group 8.81 (95% CI = 6.79 to 10.83, P<.0001). The difference between these outcomes was not statistically significant.

It is recognised that this is a simple service evaluation with all the attendant biases of a retrospective observational study. However, it is interesting to note that primary care chaplaincy showed equivalent improvements in wellbeing to antidepressants.

In conclusion, the evaluation and our experience suggest that primary care chaplaincy is a valid talking therapy and could be considered as a reasonable alternative to medication. Perhaps as we enter this new post-QOF era we may be able to deliver such a service within our clusters. Perhaps we will be ticking new boxes such as wellbeing, enablement, and reduced prescribing with a consequent reduced burden of treatment, and perhaps patients will be helped to coexist with their dis-ease.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2017

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hart JT
    (1971) The inverse care law. Lancet 1(7696):405–412.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Rose G
    (1981) Strategy of prevention: lessons from cardiovascular disease. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 282(6279):1847–1851.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    (2002) Guidelines on chaplaincy and spiritual care in the NHS in Scotland, Scottish Executive Health Department Directorate of Nursing. http://www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/mels/hdl2002_76.pdf (accessed 11 Jan 2017).
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bryson RT
    Meeting spiritual needs in general practice, Whole Person Health Trust. http://www.wphtrust.com/spirit02.html (accessed 11 Jan 2017).
  5. 5.↵
    1. Hanlon P,
    2. Carlisle S,
    3. Hannah M,
    4. et al.
    (2011) Making the case for a ‘fifth wave’ in public health. Public Health 125(1):30–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Huber M,
    2. Knottnerus JA,
    3. Green L,
    4. et al.
    (2011) How should we define health? BMJ 343:d4163.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Freeman J
    (2005) Towards a definition of holism. Br J Gen Pract 55(511):154–155.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Tennant R,
    2. Hiller L,
    3. Fishwick R,
    4. et al.
    (2007) The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 67 (655)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 67, Issue 655
February 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Primary care chaplaincy: a valid talking therapy?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Primary care chaplaincy: a valid talking therapy?
Gordon Macdonald
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (655): 77. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X689221

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Primary care chaplaincy: a valid talking therapy?
Gordon Macdonald
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (655): 77. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X689221
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • HELPING WITH THE SYMPTOMS OF DEPRESSION AND LOSS OF WELLBEING
    • A REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE TO MEDICATION
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Every home should have one: the critical role of the research librarian
  • Fakery and science
  • Viewpoint: Redundant subjectivity?
Show more Out of Hours

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242