Primary care chaplaincy: a valid talking therapy?

Gordon Macdonald

doi:10.3399/bjgp17X689221

Published eLetters

eLetter submission guidelines

Submit a Response to This Article

Compose eLetter

Title *

Author Information

Contributors

First Name and Middle Initial *

First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.

Last Name *

Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.

Email Address *

Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com. PLEASE NOTE: your email address will be published.

Occupation *

Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.

Affiliation *

Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.

Statement of Competing Interests

Competing interests? *

Yes

Please describe the competing interests

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

Do primary care chaplains need training in mental health issues?
Ian J. Hamilton

Published on: 27 January 2017

Published on: (27 January 2017)
Page navigation anchor for Do primary care chaplains need training in mental health issues?
Do primary care chaplains need training in mental health issues?
Ian J. Hamilton, Researcher, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow
I read with interest Dr Macdonald’s article which showed that talking therapy by chaplains resulted in an equivalent improvement in patient well-being as antidepressants.¹

Leavey et al² in an interview study concluded that clergy tend to explain mental health problems in terms of social factors with spiritual influences and for them the meaning of mental distress assumes more social and moral significance and Pennybacker et al³has suggested there is a need to provide chaplains with training in psychiatric illness and to more clearly define their role in mental health care.

Dr Macdonald suggests primary care chaplaincy could be considered as an alternative to cognitive behaviour therapy but before adopting this strategy more widely it would be useful to obtain the views of chaplains on what talking therapy means to them and what training they would need to provide it.

References

1. Macdonald G. Primary care chaplaincy: a valid talking therapy? Br J Gen Pract 2017: 67(655): 77. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp 17X689221

2. Leavey G. Loewenthal K, King M. Locating the social origins of mental Illness: the explanatory models of mental illness among clergy from different ethnic and faith backgrounds. J Relig Health 2016; 55(5):1607-22...
Show More

I read with interest Dr Macdonald’s article which showed that talking therapy by chaplains resulted in an equivalent improvement in patient well-being as antidepressants.¹

Leavey et al² in an interview study concluded that clergy tend to explain mental health problems in terms of social factors with spiritual influences and for them the meaning of mental distress assumes more social and moral significance and Pennybacker et al³has suggested there is a need to provide chaplains with training in psychiatric illness and to more clearly define their role in mental health care.

Dr Macdonald suggests primary care chaplaincy could be considered as an alternative to cognitive behaviour therapy but before adopting this strategy more widely it would be useful to obtain the views of chaplains on what talking therapy means to them and what training they would need to provide it.

References

1. Macdonald G. Primary care chaplaincy: a valid talking therapy? Br J Gen Pract 2017: 67(655): 77. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp 17X689221

2. Leavey G. Loewenthal K, King M. Locating the social origins of mental Illness: the explanatory models of mental illness among clergy from different ethnic and faith backgrounds. J Relig Health 2016; 55(5):1607-22

3. Pennybacker S, Hanning P, Roy D, et al. Risks, benefits and recommendations for pastoral care on inpatient psychiatric units: a systematic review. J Psych Pract 2016: 22(5):363-81

Show Less

Competing Interests: None declared.