Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editorials

Not ‘just’ a GP: a call for action

Val Wass and Simon Gregory
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (657): 148-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X689953
Val Wass OBE
Faculty of Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire.
Roles: Emeritus Professor of Medical Education
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Gregory
Midlands and East Health Education England; and GP, King Edward Road Surgery, Northampton.
Roles: Director and Dean of Education and Quality
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

‘The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings.’1

One of the most commonly heard anecdotes on the plight of general practice in medical schools is the description of the packed lecture theatre in the first week. The lecturer asks the students, ‘How many of you want to become general practitioners?’ Only three raise their hands, enabling the lecturer to comment disparagingly, ‘Well tough, half of you will “end up” as GPs.’ This is a response that sadly embeds the belief that one ‘ends up’ in general practice instead of ‘arriving’ by choice. At the same time within the NHS we face a view, entrenched from its launch, that the consultant’s career pathway is ‘a ladder off which, if unsuccessful, one falls to become a GP’.2,3 How often does one still hear the comment reflective of this hierarchical assumption that, ‘I am just a GP’? This problem was highlighted by Denis Pereira Gray more than 35 years ago,4 yet such comments are still heard far too often.

This is a call for action to bridge the primary care/secondary care ‘fault line’2 and cling to the ladder to achieve equal status. The lecturer should be expounding the view to students that, ‘Unfortunately only half of you will feel you have the intellectual ability and personal attributes to become a GP.’ As a profession we must declare that current and future primary care demands some of the brightest and best students to deliver what must now be one of the most difficult and intellectually challenging careers. As the recent report from Health Education England (HEE) and Medical Schools Council (MSC)5 concludes, medical students have a different view of future healthcare delivery. They are asking why we are failing to promote our profession as intellectually difficult and where, compared with secondary care specialties, is the active academic research-oriented profile? A tough call, but the evidence is there.4 It is a genuine perception that we as a profession must address.

ENMESHED IN A ‘CATCH-22’ SITUATION

General practice faces a challenging ‘Catch-22’ situation.6 The Lancet report ‘Health professionals for a new century’ emphasises that education and workforce development are inextricably entwined. The provision of educational services generates the supply of workforce needed to meet the demands of the health system.7 In the UK, morale is low in the profession as the service fails to meet the population’s demands. Workload is unacceptably high, increasingly transactional, and recruitment of trained GPs is difficult. These all amplify the service pressures. When professional organisations, and the media, highlight the primary care crisis, a further negative impact on recruitment risks being created. It is not surprising that medical students, placed in general practice, experience and absorb the current pervading negativism.

The sad unintended consequence is the reinforcement of a growing view among the young that general practice is not the place to be, thus mitigating the educational drive essential to produce more GPs. Medical students are highly intelligent individuals who carefully weigh the pros and cons of career options as they move through training. They claim to be deterred rather than persuaded by career marketing.5 The power to influence lies in their personal interaction with GPs as educators and role models, and in their experience on primary care placements. Positive interactions are persuasive; negative experiences are difficult to reverse. Evidence for this is now well established in the international literature.5 The positive educational drive needed from GPs to meet workforce demands is lacking.

Much has been made recently of the denigration that undoubtedly exists towards career pathways in both general practice and psychiatry.8 This risks the conclusion that the failure to engage students to become GPs lies ‘outward within the stars’ and can be blamed on other specialties. Yet this professional ‘banter’ has remained entrenched for more than half a century while recruitment to general practice has waxed and waned. Yes, it is time to challenge this unprofessional and undermining behaviour but, at the same time, only general practice itself can raise its status from that of an ‘underling’. Playing the denigration card risks GPs being perceived as victims, self-perpetuating their own plight. This lacks the impetus needed to address the students’ challenge to inspire and engage them.

HOW CAN THIS BE RESOLVED?

So where do the solutions lie? The General Medical Council’s publication Duties of a Doctor states that: ‘You should be prepared to contribute to teaching and training doctors and students.’9

When the service pressure is on, we must not set this commitment aside. Students are very clear that they need to understand the breadth and complexity of what a GP does and the skills needed to achieve this. When they do, they can be inspired to become one, or, at the very least, defend any perceptions generated through denigration by others that it is a second-class career.

There are many ways this can be tackled even before a student starts in medical school. The HEE/MSC report5 outlines the importance of promoting general practice in schools, offering work experience in primary care before medical school entry and ensuring GPs are always involved in selection processes. There is a call for the GMC to revise its outcomes for graduates to reflect the rapidly changing workforce needs and ensure students develop a full understanding of primary care. General practice must be championed within the medical school curriculum and GPs must lead on this. Inspiring GP role models have a major impact on students. GPs must rise above the current professional negativism and offer a view of a bright future for students to aspire to. They must inspire and resist the temptation to deter.5

Perhaps one of the most staggering findings of the report5 is the dwindling, rather than expanding, drive for academic GP departments in medical schools. Only 6% of medical school clinical academics are in primary care, yet GPs form 50% of the workforce. Moreover, a large portion of general practice research is now held within the nine schools within the National School for Primary Care Research, diluting even further students’ access to primary care research across the remaining medical schools. How ironic at a time when research into the complexity of primary care should be escalating to rationalise and optimise service delivery.

A tension exists within general practice, as the report5 highlights, between those offering dedicated service delivery at the coal face and those following more academic career pathways. Students, and indeed secondary care doctors, perceive that general practice does not offer research opportunities and seeks to recruit from the less academic strata of students. The quote ‘you would be wasted in general practice’ is still prevalent and reflects this lower status. Unity within our profession is essential to address this.

WE MUST INSIST ON EQUITY

We believe the profession must work to bridge the perception that a career in primary care is a job for those falling off the secondary care training ladder. We shouldn’t aim to reverse the status and rise higher but we must insist that we merit equity. The move to a single GMC Specialty Register and title of ‘consultant in primary or community care’ is a report recommendation already under serious consideration.

General practice needs doctors with intellectual flexibility, resilience, and an ability to handle risk and uncertainty —not everyone has these attributes. It is too ‘scary’ for some.5 Any move to create a medical school focused on producing only GPs is therefore flawed. These professional characteristics need fostering and take time to develop. As one young doctor said, ‘It took time for me to recognise I could “go solo”.’ Ensuring flexibility of career pathways that bridge and foster mutual respect across the current divide between primary and secondary care is essential. We must resist the temptation to regard ourselves as underlings and find a way forward to overcome the current negativism that is turning students away from general practice. Adequate funding to support education in general practice must be addressed by the Department of Health and medical schools. But this will fail unless GPs too can role model to students that it is an intellectually challenging career to ‘arrive in with heads held high’ and not where one ‘just ends up’.

Notes

Provenance

Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Competing interests

Simon Gregory is employed by Health Education England, which is responsible for increasing recruitment to GP specialty training.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2017

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Shakespeare W
    Julius Caesar, pp 140–141, Act I, Scene III, L.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Jones R
    (2016) Br J Gen Pract, Fault lines. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X684841.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Reeve J,
    2. Irving G,
    3. Freeman G
    (2013) Dismantling Lord Moran’s ladder: the primary care expert generalist. Br J Gen Pract 63(606):34–35.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Pereira Gray DJ
    (1980) Just a GP. Gale Memorial Lecture 1979. J R Coll Gen Pract 30(213):231–239.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Wass V
    (2016) By choice — not by chance: supporting medical students towards future careers in general practice (Health Education England and the Medical Schools Council, London) https://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/By%20choice%20not%20by%20chance%20web%20FINAL.pdf (accessed 1 Mar 2017).
  6. 6.↵
    Catch-22. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch-22 (accessed 1 Mar 2017).
  7. 7.↵
    1. Frenk J,
    2. Chen L,
    3. Bhutta ZA,
    4. et al.
    (2010) Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. A Global Independent Commission. Lancet 376(9756):1923–1958.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Baker M,
    2. Wessely S,
    3. Openshaw D
    (2016) Br J Gen Pract, Not such friendly banter? GPs and psychiatrists against the systematic denigration of their specialties. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X687169.
  9. 9.↵
    1. General Medical Council
    (2013) Duties of a doctor, http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/teaching_training.asp (accessed 1 Mar 2017).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 67 (657)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 67, Issue 657
April 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Not ‘just’ a GP: a call for action
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Not ‘just’ a GP: a call for action
Val Wass, Simon Gregory
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (657): 148-149. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X689953

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Not ‘just’ a GP: a call for action
Val Wass, Simon Gregory
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (657): 148-149. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X689953
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • ENMESHED IN A ‘CATCH-22’ SITUATION
    • HOW CAN THIS BE RESOLVED?
    • WE MUST INSIST ON EQUITY
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Socioeconomic deprivation and post-stroke care in the community
  • Advocating for patients through laboratory tests: what do GPs’ use of blood tests for suspected cancer tell us?
  • Diagnosis of prostate cancer in primary care: navigating updated clinical guidance
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242