Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Out of Hours

Bad Medicine: Medical student numbers

Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (657): 175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X690305
Des Spence
Maryhill Health Centre, Glasgow.
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Here is an interesting fact. In 2011, only 50 out of 30 000 pupils receiving free school meals were accepted into Oxbridge, compared with 60 from the final year of 300 from Eton College.1 Oxbridge is deemed to be the zenith of academic achievement and parents use hushed reverential tones when they even mention the word. But I’m good at statistics and, if you consider the spread of IQ in the population, it is statistically impossible that Oxbridge are accepting the most able students based on merit. There is a confounding factor at play: schooling. Many pupils gain admission by old-fashioned cheating, help with coursework, extra tutors, support with writing personal statements, and the slew of additional activities like piano lessons to pad out the CV. It’s not what you know after all, but who you know. Here I should declare a conflict of interest: I am one of the free school dinner kids and these numbers irk me deeply!

So what does this political posturing have to do with medicine? A lot. Medicine is the most elitist profession with 25% of the intake from private schools and 80% from professional or senior management backgrounds (with Scotland being the least socially diverse nation).2 We are selecting doctors from a very narrow band of the population, making the profession homogenous and bland. Again, the same Oxbridge argument holds true: it is statistically impossible that we are selecting students on the basis of merit. It is privilege at play, with medicine seen as a trophy degree.

So we have a recruitment crisis in general practice and shortages of doctors throughout many medical and surgical grades, and we are spending £3.7 billion on agency staff to plug this workforce gap.3 There seems an obvious solution. Medical degrees are oversubscribed with many qualified applicants rejected on a largely arbitrary selection process. The course is onerous but not difficult. Why don’t we simply train more doctors?

It costs over £200 000 to train a doctor.4 Complete undergraduate training amounts to £57 000 in tuition and £151 000 in clinical placement, which is essentially peanuts in the context of current agency costs.

There are plans to increase undergraduate numbers by 25%5 but this will be inadequate. Demand for medical care is increasing and working patterns mean that more part-time working is the norm. We should double the current 6000 to 12 000 medical students — only costing about £1 billion and bringing the UK graduate numbers in line with other European countries.6 There would be a potential risk of medical unemployment, but why should only doctors be protected from the risk of unemployment? So why isn’t the profession agitating and promoting this logical economic argument for a massive expansion in medical numbers?

It is self-interest. Economic scarcity of doctors means we artificially inflate fees, protect private practice, and maintain status, but it is a brake to change and innovation. We demand more work–life balance while clinging to outdated notions of status and position. We can’t have it both ways — something has to give.

We need more medical schools, to expand the ones we have and overhaul the outdated, thoughtless, and rote undergraduate teaching experience. Having many more doctors would reduce elitism, which would only be good for doctors because it is the jarring dissonance between the realities of the job and youthful expectations that make so many doctors miserable.

We are wasting potential. Medicine needs a different skillset and a lot more spice.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2017

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Clark L
    (Jun 26, 2014) Daily Mail, Just FIFTY pupils on free school meals get into Oxbridge each year … but the two universities take 60 from Eton alone. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2671363/Just-FIFTY-pupils-free-school-meals-Oxbridge-year-two-universities-60-Eton-alone.html (accessed 6 Mar 2017).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Carrell S
    (Jan 22, 2016) Guardian, Students from wealthy backgrounds dominate medical schools. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/society/2016/jan/22/medical-school-students-wealthy-backgrounds (accessed 6 Mar 2017).
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bodkin H
    (May 9, 2016) Telegraph, NHS spending on agency staff increases despite control measures. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/09/nhs-agency-staff-spending/ (accessed 6 Mar 2017).
  4. 4.↵
    1. British Medical Association
    (January, 2013) How much does it cost to train a doctor in the United Kingdom? https://www.bma.org.uk/-/media/Files/Word%20files/News%20views%20analysis/pressbriefing_cost_of_training_doctors.docx (download) (accessed 6 Mar 2017).
  5. 5.↵
    1. Triggle N
    (Oct 4, 2016) BBC News, Student doctor numbers to rise by 25%. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-37546360 (accessed 6 Mar 2017).
  6. 6.↵
    1. Donnelly L
    (Dec 3, 2014) Telegraph, UK has fewer doctors than almost every EU country. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11271216/UK-has-fewer-doctors-than-almost-every-EU-country.html (accessed 6 Mar 2017).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 67 (657)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 67, Issue 657
April 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bad Medicine: Medical student numbers
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Bad Medicine: Medical student numbers
Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (657): 175. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X690305

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Bad Medicine: Medical student numbers
Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (657): 175. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X690305
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Every home should have one: the critical role of the research librarian
  • Fakery and science
  • Viewpoint: Redundant subjectivity?
Show more Out of Hours

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242