Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Revitalising general practice: unleashing our inner scholar

Joanne Reeve and Adam Firth
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (659): 266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X691145
Joanne Reeve
Warwick Primary Care, Warwick Medical School, Coventry. E-mail:
Roles: Clinical Reader
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: j.reeve.1@warwick.ac.uk
Adam Firth
Bracondale Medical Centre, Stockport, Cheshire. E-mail:
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: adfirth@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

‘I’m exhausted. I can’t do any more …‘

These could be the words of very many of us, as our profession deals with some of its most profound challenges to date. But can adversity stimulate creativity?1 Our profession is at a crossroads — we have reached our very own Reggie Perrin moment.2 It is time for us to leave behind our Scientific Bureaucratic Medicine3 chains (policed referral pathways, mandatory measurement …) on the proverbial beach. And instead to reimagine ourselves, our job, and our role within the context of an intellectual profession leading the highest standards of person-centred health care. It is time to embrace our inner scholar.

‘But I’m too busy seeing patients …’

At the 2016 RCGP Conference, we traced the path in the sand for this new way of thinking by tackling three myths about academic general practice:

Myth #1. I haven’t got time for academic work

Yet scholarship is an integral part of daily clinical practice. Every time we use our clinical judgement to make a decision to medicalise an individual’s illness, we are employing the scholarship described in Iona Heath’s gatekeeper model of expert generalism.4 When we explore an illness experience with a patient, we collect data, often weighing up conflicting statistics and integrating it to create an individually tailored interpretation of what is wrong. We then apply our new knowledge to the patient in order to create and implement a management plan, and, in doing so, inspire our patient to find new ways to understand and address their illness experience. These activities (above, in italics) are the skills of scholarship.5 Each time we reflect with colleagues on a patient concern or practice issue, we are doing the academic work evidenced by John Gabby’s research on the construction of mindlines:6 the process by which GPs work collectively to produce contextualised knowledge-in-practice. This is aside from the work of multitudes of colleagues across the country engaged in education, teaching, and innovation.7

Myth #2. Being ‘just a GP’

How often have you heard people describe GPs as a ‘Jack of all trades’ with the implied criticism of being a ‘master of none’? GPs certainly do many tasks; and have the flexibility to manage a number of areas of clinical practice. We are technically proficient, and efficient, across a range of tasks, and so can be used to plug many a gap in health service rotas and systems. But our capacity to function in this ‘Jack of all trades’ role stems from a distinct mastery of clinical reasoning and clinical decision making that is medical generalism.8 This is an expertise built on the academic principle that ‘it’s not what you know, but how you use it’ (technically speaking, an expertise built on a different epistemological framework for judging knowledge).5 People outside of the profession often don’t understand what we do when we deliver whole-person medicine, and so instead presume a ‘master of none’ approach. This is the justification for quality systems within the model of Scientific Bureaucratic Medicine3 introducing a ‘technical bypass’ of our distinct generalist expertise8 As a profession, we need to reimagine, and so reclaim, the intellectual primacy of our discipline.

Myth #3. Academics are people working in universities

Many of the giants whose shoulders our profession stands on were not formally employed university academics — Julian Tudor Hart, John Fry, Roger Neighbour, Iona Heath. We should not — do not — define academic status by virtue of the contracts that people hold, the places in which they publish their writing, or a bestowed job title. Rather, we should compare the work they do against Boyer’s description of scholarship,9 recognising that ‘knowledge is acquired through research, synthesis, practice and teaching’. Professionally discovering ways to use knowledge to solve real-world problems — whether in practice, teaching, or innovation — is a form of scholarship. Scholarship gives us a way to rethink the ‘Fall and Rise of General Practice’. Scientific Bureaucratic Medicine3 — one way to describe the systems-level application of evidence-based medicine — has contributed to the fall of the profession through devaluing professional wisdom in favour of a narrow form of scientific knowledge, so reducing general practice to an increasingly technical role.8 Revitalising scholarship supports us in reimagining, re-energising, and so revitalising our profession.

The SAPC and RCGP are working together on ideas to enhance and develop scholarship across the GP career pathway. We started with a workshop at last year’s conference. This piece launches a new BJGP Blog series in which GPs share their experience of everyday scholarship. If you have a story to tell, do get in touch. We are establishing resources to support scholarship across the GP career path: https://sapc.ac.uk/article/gp-scholarship.

All so we can move Forward Together10 to revitalise our profession.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2017

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Carel H
    (2008) Illness (the art of living) (Routledge, Abingdon).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Wikipedia
    The fall and rise of Reginald Perrin, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fall_and_Rise_of_Reginald_Perrin#Background_and_influence (accessed 2 May 2017).
  3. 3.↵
    1. Harrison S,
    2. Moran M,
    3. Wood B
    (2002) Policy emergence and policy convergence: the case of ‘scientific-bureaucratic medicine’ in the United States and United Kingdom. Br J Polit Int Relat 4:1–24.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Heath I
    (2011) Divided we fail. Clin Med (London) 11(6):576–586.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Reeve J
    (2010) Interpretive medicine: supporting generalism in a changing primary care world. Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract 88:1–20, v.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Gabbay J,
    2. Le May A
    (2010) Practice-based evidence for healthcare: clinical mindlines (Routledge, Abingdon).
  7. 7.↵
    1. Royal College of General Practitioners.
    Bright ideas to make your job better, http://www.rcgp.org.uk/bright-ideas (accessed 2 May 2017).
  8. 8.↵
    1. Reeve J,
    2. Blakeman T,
    3. Freeman GK,
    4. et al.
    (2013) Generalist solutions to complex problems: generating practice-based evidence — the example of managing multi-morbidity. BMC Fam Pract 14:112.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Boyer EL
    (1990) Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching), http://www.hadinur.com/paper/BoyerScholarshipReconsidered.pdf (accessed 2 May 2017).
  10. 10.↵
    1. Royal College of General Practitioners.
    Forward together How we lead primary care to the next level, http://www.rcgp.org.uk/annualconference (accessed 2 May 2017).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 67 (659)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 67, Issue 659
June 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Revitalising general practice: unleashing our inner scholar
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Revitalising general practice: unleashing our inner scholar
Joanne Reeve, Adam Firth
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (659): 266. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X691145

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Revitalising general practice: unleashing our inner scholar
Joanne Reeve, Adam Firth
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (659): 266. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X691145
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Myth #1. I haven’t got time for academic work
    • Myth #2. Being ‘just a GP’
    • Myth #3. Academics are people working in universities
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Yonder: HFpEF, amputees, professional identity formation, and leadership training
  • Manufacturing doctors is one thing; sustaining working communities is quite another
  • Junior doctors leaving the NHS: what would it mean for general practice?
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242