Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Bad Medicine: Defensiveness

Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (659): 272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X691217
Des Spence
Maryhill Health Centre, Glasgow.
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Doctors know the streets of the NHS and all the rat runs. They know how to jump the queue or just ‘phone a friend’ to gain preferential treatment. And our organisations, like the GMC and the BMA, even affirm this two-tier system by offering staff private health care. Doctors might use the NHS, but certainly not like normal NHS patients. Doctors live in a healthcare bubble and are blind to the many day-to-day problems of the NHS faced by patients. And we have limited personal vested interest in change.

But I suggest phoning a non-medical friend for feedback on the NHS and keep your head down for the response. The NHS failings chatter out like a heavy machine gun: the fact they wait 3 months to get a scan result; the fact that consultants and GPs won’t take messages to phone patients back; the fact that the GP practices have an ‘on-the-day’ appointment system but the phones are constantly engaged; blood results are only available in narrow time windows; prescriptions take 72 hours to process; and patients have to make a return appointment for bloods. Hospitals constantly cancel appointments, or appointments are sent out after the appointment date, and why does it takes months to be seen for an outpatient-based specialist like dermatology? Why does it take months to see an NHS physiotherapist? What are they actually doing most of the time? But if you’ve got cash, they see you tomorrow privately, no problem! On and on, a rolling barrage of issues — ‘I pay my taxes …’ I never get defensive of the NHS and helpfully defuse the situation by simply saying, ‘You are right!’

For there are so many restrictive practices in the NHS, thoughtless ‘rules’ that impact on ordinary patients, and there is a pervasive ‘can’t do culture’. Doctors blame the system, blame the management, and blame a lack of resources. But, in truth, we are personally and directly responsible for many of these failings.

The NHS might be efficient as a per capita GDP spend, but it is woefully inefficient in so many other ways. This isn’t a party political issue but organisational. The bureaucracy is too distant; the NHS needs better management. The academics and medical politicians have the ear of politicians but they often have limited operational real-life experience. Every initiative or guideline is over-done, over-complicated, with foreseeable unforeseen negative consequences.

Here are some simple suggestions that will work: no research ‘evidence’ or expensive pilots needed. Operating an ‘on-the-day’ appointment system? Have six people answer the phone in the morning, not just two. Physiotherapy: don’t offer six treatments, offer single assessment appointments. Make dermatologists do 20-minute appointments and see 20 new patients a day, 5 days a week. Call patients with their scan results and text all patients with their blood results, even if normal. Make managers work in wards and in GP surgeries. Short on doctors? Train more. Scrap ‘Doctor’ as it is a job description not a title, for pernicious deference is strangling innovation in the NHS. Prescribe less, investigate less, and refer less. Rationalise and simplify.

Doctors need to be agents of change but must start listening to how others experience the NHS. The NHS does need more resources, but could do a lot better with the resources it has. The NHS is great but it should and could be so much better. Aggressive defensiveness of the NHS is bad for the NHS and is bad medicine.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2017
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 67 (659)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 67, Issue 659
June 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bad Medicine: Defensiveness
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Bad Medicine: Defensiveness
Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (659): 272. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X691217

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Bad Medicine: Defensiveness
Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (659): 272. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X691217
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Where I end and you begin: additional roles in British general practice
  • Yonder #100: Nasal sprays, obstetric ultrasound, binge eating disorder, and emergency departments
  • Virtuoso general practice
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242