Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Blog
    • eLetters
    • Feedback
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Blog
    • eLetters
    • Feedback
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
Life & Times

The NHS: have the rivets popped?

Gervase Vernon
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (660): 309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X691385
Gervase Vernon
John Tasker House Surgery, Essex. E-mail: gervase@jth.demon.co.uk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gervase@jth.demon.co.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Figure1

When the Titanic struck an iceberg in 1912 the popular account has it that, because the ship veered to the left to avoid the iceberg, it was gashed all down its right side. As a result water flowed into five of the separate watertight compartments and the ship sank. In fact, Robert Ballard’s submersible Argo, in 1985, found that the source of the ship’s catastrophic failure was not a gash. Rather, the force of the impact distorted the hull so violently that, as it buckled inwards, many of the rivets holding the steel plates of the hull popped, leading to flooding of the compartments.1

Am I comparing the present state of the NHS to that of the Titanic shortly after it hit the iceberg? By no means. I cannot foretell the future and I do not know how long the NHS will stay afloat. Rather, I wish to make a different analogy. Nobody thought the Titanic would sink; looking back, that overconfidence itself is seen to have contributed to the accident. Similarly, very few British people, be they ordinary citizens, patients, NHS employees, or politicians, think that the NHS can fail and disappear rapidly. Yet, complex social institutions, built up over decades, can quickly vanish; one need only open the pages of a daily newspaper to see examples of this.

A relevant example to the case of England and the NHS is the dissolution of the monasteries under Henry VIII. For centuries they had provided food, shelter, and some minimum medical care to the poor and outcast of England. They depended on a social consensus that such care should be given and that the monks and nuns who had dedicated their lives to this were the right people to provide it. That the monasteries would cease to exist was inconceivable. Yet, when the king decided to suppress them, the monasteries disappeared within 5 years (1534–1539).2

Two factors contributed to their sudden demise. The most pressing was the king’s need for money. However, another factor was the appearance in the court of reformers who had a different understanding of the world from that of the Middle Ages and who saw charity as more of an individual than a corporate duty. The parallels to the NHS are all too clear.

It appears that some politicians have no understanding of the great dedication with which doctors and nurses, especially in their training years, regard their job, dedication without which the whole service cannot run. These politicians understand only the market model for the provision of services that was the basis for Lansley’s 2012 Health and Social Care Act. Treating junior doctors according to this model has led to the unresolved dispute over their contract and since then to a spectacular and never previously seen loss of morale. A set of rivets gone from the structure of the NHS; gone partly because those in charge do not understand that the culture of the NHS is delicate and needs nurturing rather than being subject to wanton destruction.

The head of NHS England, Simon Stevens, had asked the government for more money. Not receiving it, he has had to abandon the ‘18-week waiting list target’. Abandoning this target generates savings only in the first year while the waiting lists are allowed to lengthen. Thereafter, no further savings accrue, but the waiting lists remain. Moreover, to recover the lost ground you need to spend double the money, to pay for the current patients and to catch up on the waiting list. This requires a huge cash boost such as Brown gave in the second Blair government when he was chancellor — something that is unlikely to recur. Another set of rivets gone from the structure of the NHS.

If we see the NHS as equivalent to the liner Titanic, then the iceberg, as many have pointed out, is the increasing costs of the NHS linked to an ageing population and technological progress. Will the NHS survive these changes and, if so, for how long? To repeat myself, I do not claim to be able to foretell the future. But unless we realise the speed with which a complex social institution like the NHS can be destroyed, we may, albeit unwittingly, contribute to its destruction by a foolish overconfidence that it cannot be irreversibly damaged.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2017

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Weissmann G
    (1998) Darwin’s Audubon: science and the liberal imagination, Titanic and Leviathan (Perseus Publishing, New York, NY), pp 269–281.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Duffy E
    (1992) The stripping of the altars: traditional religion in England, 1400–1580 (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 67 (660)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 67, Issue 660
July 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The NHS: have the rivets popped?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
Citation Tools
The NHS: have the rivets popped?
Gervase Vernon
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (660): 309. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X691385

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The NHS: have the rivets popped?
Gervase Vernon
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (660): 309. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X691385
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

Life & Times

  • Books: Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup
  • Bad Medicine: Nofreelunch
  • Poem: ‘Just a GP’
Show more Life & Times

Viewpoint

  • Bring Hippocrates to the people and save the NHS
  • Getting the swagger back into general practice
Show more Viewpoint

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

 

Register by 10 December and save 15% at the BJGP Research Conference, 12 March 2020

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Blog
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2019 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242