Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Bad Medicine: Evidence-based health care?

Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (662): 411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X692381
Des Spence
Maryhill Health Centre, Glasgow.
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Evidence-based health care is all the rage. We should not change anything without ‘evidence’. The great thinkers of general practice cascade this down to us, the proles; the working practitioners. But, unfortunately, most of the published research is irrelevant, meaningless, and useless to us. It is spewed out merely to complete an MD with topics like: researching by validated questionnaire, whether validated questionnaires are valid, into assessing the viability of a pilot on toenail cutting in men with low magnesium levels over a 10-year period in rural Bulgaria. So here is the shocking truth: we are going to have to change the process of general practice without evidence, using ‘ideas and experience’. Here are 10 utterly non-evidence-based ideas and observations into change in general practice:

Get bigger

To be efficient you need a certain scale and most practices are too small. Remember, most doctors are hardworking, reasonable people and you can work alongside them! Also, allow yourselves to be managed.

Separate non-urgent work from urgent work

And do one or the other, but not both at the same time. This toxic mix is at the centre of the chaos that is primary care. Operate an on-call system, and base the doctor in the reception area.

Access is key, but in general practice it is poor

Make improving access your goal and all else will follow. Most practices focus on minor, irrelevant details while the practice is ablaze. Also, despite what you have been told, triage systems don’t work.

Don’t keep bringing patients back!

Look at your appointment book, stuffed full of a small group of frequent returners filling advanced appointment slots. Instead, offer two-thirds of appointments ‘on the day’. Also, question why doctors are booking return appointments.

Change your culture

General practice is a personality cult, focused on the needs and opinions of the doctor. This allows doctors to behave in ways that would be unacceptable in other organisations. You need to address unreasonable behaviour head on! Use first names with all staff and patients, thus aiding communication. Titles are barriers and deference is a poison to change.

Try out some mantras and sound bites

‘Less medicine is more medicine’/‘Intervene less, investigate less, refer less, and prescribe less’/’Can do, not can’t do’/‘Always listen but don’t always act’/‘Today’s work today’/‘Text not letter’/’General practice is the art of reassurance; doing nothing with style’/‘It isn’t what you know, it’s what you don’t know that’s important.’ Think up some of your own!

Most guidelines are twaddle

They are merely the opinion of a distant, deluded specialist, not based on evidence or experience of primary care. Be willing to challenge and ignore them. Beware of the certain, for it is most certainly wrong.

Chuck out all old journals and books

Paint your practice and spend money on its appearance. Open your eyes and see how tatty your working environment is. Welcome in the new millennium and the internet.

Unable to recruit GPs?

Don’t despair. Do something different like using GP nurses, GP paramedics, GP counsellors, and GP physiotherapists. It works and it’s better than what has gone before.

Don’t delude yourself

You are not special; you cannot offer startling insights into people’s lives. Change is in the gift of the individual. Reflect on the limitations of what you can actually do.

So don’t wait for the cavalry to save general practice: they are not coming. Don’t wait for research evidence either, because it will come too late and won’t answer your question. You don’t need evidence to change, merely a willingness to change; and a few good ideas.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2017
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 67 (662)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 67, Issue 662
September 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bad Medicine: Evidence-based health care?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Bad Medicine: Evidence-based health care?
Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (662): 411. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X692381

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Bad Medicine: Evidence-based health care?
Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (662): 411. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X692381
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Get bigger
    • Separate non-urgent work from urgent work
    • Access is key, but in general practice it is poor
    • Don’t keep bringing patients back!
    • Change your culture
    • Try out some mantras and sound bites
    • Most guidelines are twaddle
    • Chuck out all old journals and books
    • Unable to recruit GPs?
    • Don’t delude yourself
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • The many flavours of justice in primary care
  • Books: Frontline. Saving Lives in War, Disaster and Disease
  • Should there be preferential health care for healthcare workers?
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242